切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胸部外科电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (01) : 7 -14. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8773.2016.01.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

腔镜辅助下McKeown术式切除食管癌18年经验总结
孔敏1, 陈保富1, 王春国1, 张波1, 张健1, 马德华1, 叶敏华1, 叶中瑞1, 朱成楚1,()   
  1. 1. 317000 临海,温州医科大学附属台州医院胸外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-05 出版日期:2016-02-28
  • 通信作者: 朱成楚

Video-assisted McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: 18-year experience in a single institution

Min Kong1, Baofu Chen1, Chunguo Wang1, Bo Zhang1, Jian Zhang1, Dehua Ma1, Minhua Ye1, Zhongrui Ye1, Chengchu Zhu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Taizhou Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai 317000, China
  • Received:2016-01-05 Published:2016-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Chengchu Zhu
  • About author:
    Correspondence author: Zhu Chengchu, Email:
引用本文:

孔敏, 陈保富, 王春国, 张波, 张健, 马德华, 叶敏华, 叶中瑞, 朱成楚. 腔镜辅助下McKeown术式切除食管癌18年经验总结[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2016, 03(01): 7-14.

Min Kong, Baofu Chen, Chunguo Wang, Bo Zhang, Jian Zhang, Dehua Ma, Minhua Ye, Zhongrui Ye, Chengchu Zhu. Video-assisted McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: 18-year experience in a single institution[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Thoracic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 03(01): 7-14.

目的

总结腔镜辅助下McKeown术式切除食管癌的单中心18年经验体会。

方法

回顾性分析1997年8月至2015年6月在温州医科大学附属台州医院胸外科行食管癌切除的639例患者的临床资料,其中在腔镜辅助下完成McKeown食管癌切除手术622例(97.34%)。食管肿瘤位于上、中、下段分别占7.98%、63.54%和28.48%,其中8.92%的患者术前接受放化疗。TNM分期中,0、Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ期分别占10.33%、29.26%、42.10%、15.02%和3.29%;病理检查为鳞癌占92.02%,腺癌及其他类型占7.98%。手术采用腔镜辅助下经右胸、上腹、左颈入路,其中胸腔镜+开腹占44.60%,胸腔镜+腹腔镜占47.26%,开胸+腹腔镜占5.48%,非计划中转开胸或开腹占2.66%。

结果

胸腔镜下食管游离及胸腔淋巴结清扫时间为(78.6±36.9)min,腹腔镜下胃游离及腹区淋巴结清扫时间为(55.4±19.5)min;胸腔镜手术出血量为(99.5±79.2)ml,腹腔镜手术出血量为(40.5±23.4)ml。每例患者平均清扫淋巴结总数为(24.1±12.4)枚,其中胸腔淋巴结清扫(14.9±8.1)枚,腹腔淋巴结清扫(9.1±5.5)枚,颈区淋巴结清扫(1.5±1.3)枚。全组术中无死亡病例,术中因奇静脉或脾脏损伤出血4例,电凝钩或超声刀误伤气管4例,非病灶原因胸导管损伤13例,心房纤颤11例,食管切缘阳性R1切除者4例。术后早期并发症超过10例次的包括肺部感染(11.42%)、颈部吻合瘘(7.04%)、心律失常(4.85%)、胸腔积液需要置管(3.29%)、喉返神经损伤(3.13%),术后乳糜胸(2.03%)。术后早期死亡6例(0.94%),分别为术后呼吸衰竭3例、气管管胃瘘后肺部严重感染1例、难控性高血糖并颈部吻合口瘘迁延不愈及多器官衰竭1例、胸胃瘘或坏死致主动脉腐蚀破裂出血1例。术后接受放化疗307例(48.04%);术后随访率为90.8%,平均随访时间(44.5±33.1)个月;术后1、2、3、5年的生存率分别为83.9%、69.7%、57.1%和45.5%。

结论

腔镜辅助下McKeown术式食管癌切除在肿瘤R0切除,以及术后近远期疗效上是可行且有效的。

Objective

To summarize the 18-year experience in video-assisted McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 639patients with esophageal cancer undergoing McKeown esophagectomy between August 1997 and June 2015 in Department of Thoracic Surgery, Taizhou Hospital affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. Among these 639 patients, 622(97.34%) completed the surgery with video-assisted procedures. A total of 7.98% of esophageal tumors located in the upper segment, 63.54% in the middle segment, and 28.48% in the lower segment.Preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was done in 8.92% of patients. For TNM staging, stage 0 accounted for 10.33%, stage Ⅰ29.26%, stage Ⅱ 42.10%, stage Ⅲ15.02% and stage Ⅳ 3.29%. Pathological examinations demonstrated that there were 92.02% of squamous cancer and 7.98% of adenocarcinoma and other histological types.Surgery were completed by thoracoscopy and laparotomy(44.60%), thoracoscopy and laparoscopy(47.26%), thoracotomy and laparoscopy(5.48%), and conversion to thoracotomy or laparotomy (2.66%).

Results

The time of esophagus freeing and pleural lymph node dissection under thoracoscope was (78.6±36.9)min, and the time of stomach freeing and abdominal lymph node dissection under laparoscope was (55.4±19.5) min. The volumes of blood loss in thoracoscopic surgery and laparoscopic surgery were (99.5±79.2) ml and (40.5±23.4) ml respectively. The mean total number of lymph node dissection was(24.1±12.4) per case, and the number of thoracic lymph node dissection was (14.9±8.1) per case, abdominal lymph node dissection (9.1±5.5) per case, and neck lymph node dissection (1.5±1.3) per case. There was no death during operation. There were 4 cases of intraoperative bleeding due to the azygos vein or spleen injury, 4 cases of accidental tracheal injury caused by cautery hook or ultrasound knife, 13 cases of thoracic duct injury of non-focal cause, 11 cases of atrial fibrillation and 4 cases of esophageal resection margin-positive R1 resection. The major complications in the early postoperative period which occurred in more than 10 cases were lung infection(11.42%), neck anastomosis leak(7.04%), arrhythmia(4.85%), pleural effusion catheterization(3.29%), recurrent laryngeal nerve injury(3.13%) and chylothorax(2.03%). Six cases(0.94%) died early after operation. Among them, 3 died of postoperative respiratory failure, 1 severe pulmonary infection after tracheoesophageal fistula, 1 recurrent hyperglycemia complicated with neck anastomotic fistula uncured and multiple organ failure, and the other aorta rupture and bleeding caused by chest gastric fistula or necrosis. Three hundred and seven patients (48.04%) received postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The follow-up rate was 90.8%, and the mean follow-up time was (44.5 ± 33.1) months.The 1, 2, 3, and 5-year overall survival rates were 83.9%, 69.7%, 57.1%and 45.5%, respectively.

Conclusions

Video-assisted McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is feasible and effective in tumor R0 resection and short-term and long-term effects.

表1 639例食管癌患者的一般临床资料
图1 食管癌患者胸腔镜手术体位及切口示意图。A:手术体位;B:切口示意图
图2 食管癌患者腹腔镜手术体位示意图。A:手术体位;B:切口示意图
表2 不同腔镜辅助下McKeown食管癌切除术中情况
表3 McKeown食管癌切除术后早期并发症
图3 McKeown食管癌切除术后患者总生存率分析
[1]
TorreLA,BrayF,SiegelRL,et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2015, 65(2): 87-108.
[2]
McKeownKC.Total three-stage oesophagectomy for cancer of the oesophagus [J]. Br J Surg,1976, 63:259-262.
[3]
Japanese Society for Esophageal Diseases. Guidelines for clinical and pathologic studies on carcinoma of the esophagus, ninth edition: Preface, general principles, part Ⅰ [J]. Esophagus, 2004, 1(2): 61-88.
[4]
BiereSS,MaasKW,BonavinaL,et al. Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial) [J]. BMC Surg, 2011, 11:2.
[5]
BiereSS,van Berge HenegouwenMI,MaasKW,et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial [J]. Lancet, 2012, 379(9829): 1887-1892.
[6]
SwisherSG,DefordL,MerrimanKW, et al. Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer [J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2000, 119(6): 1126-1132.
[7]
BaileySH,BullDA,HarpoleDH,et al. Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort [J]. Ann Thorac Surg,2003, 75(1): 217-222; discussion 22.
[8]
BirkmeyerJD,SiewersAE,FinlaysonEV,et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States [J]. N Engl J Med,2002, 346(15): 1128-1137.
[9]
SabanathanS,MearnsAJ,RichardsonJ. Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach [J]. J R Coll Surg Edinb, 1992, 37(4):284-285.
[10]
DePaulaAL,HashibaK,FerreiraEA,et al. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with esophagogastroplasty[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1995, 5(1):1-5.
[11]
LuketichJD,PennathurA,FranchettiY, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: results of a prospective phase II multicenter trial-the eastern cooperative oncology group (E2202) study[J]. Ann Surg,2015 Apr;261(4):702-707.
[12]
EdgeS,ByrdD,ComptonC, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual[M]. 7th ed. New York:Springer, 2010.
[13]
ChenB,ZhangB,ZhuC, et al. Modified McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a 5-year retrospective study of 142 patients in a single institution [J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(12): e82428.
[14]
D'AmicoTA. Mckeown esophagogastrectomy [J]. J Thorac Dis,2014,6(Suppl 3):S322-S324.
[15]
PerryY,FernandoHC. Three-field minimally invasive esophagectomy: current results and technique [J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2012,144(3):S63-S66.
[16]
KoyanagiK,OzawaS,TachimoriY. Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review [J].Surg Today,2016 ,46(3):275-284.
[17]
PalaniveluC,PrakashA,SenthilkumarR,et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position—experience of 130 patients [J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2006,203(1):7-16.
[18]
BartelsH,ThorbanS,SiewertJR. Anterior versus posterior reconstruction after transhiatal oesophagectomy: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Br J Surg,1993, 80(9): 1141-1144.
[19]
UrschelJD,UrschelDM,MillerJD, et al. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of route of reconstruction after esophagectomy for cancer [J]. Am J Surg,2001, 182(5): 470-475.
[20]
ChenH,LuJJ,ZhouJ, et al. Anterior versus posterior routes of reconstruction after esophagectomy: a comparative anatomic study [J].Ann Thorac Surg,2009, 87(2): 400-404.
[21]
HuH,YeT,TanD, et al. Is anterior mediastinum route a shorter choice for esophageal reconstruction? A comparative anatomic study [J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2011 Dec;40(6):1466-1469.
[22]
LuketichJD,Alvelo-RiveraM,BuenaventuraPO, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients [J].Ann Surg, 2003, 238(4): 486-494; discussion 94-95.
[23]
DantocM,CoxMR,EslickGD. Evidence to support the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis [J]. Arch Surg, 2012, 147(8): 768-76.
[24]
SinghRK,PhamTH,DiggsBS,et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides equivalent oncologic outcomes to open esophagectomy for locally advanced (stage Ⅱ or Ⅲ) esophageal carcinoma [J]. Arch Surg, 2011, 146(6): 711-714.
[25]
van HagenP,HulshofMC,van LanschotJJ,et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer [J]. N Engl J Med,2012,366(22):2074-2084.
[26]
马雅婷,连士勇,刘志才,等.河南省林州市食管癌人群现时生存分析[J]. 中华预防医学杂志,2009, 43(12): 1100-1104.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?