切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胸部外科电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (04) : 193 -198. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8773.2016.04.01

所属专题: 文献

论著

老年多发磨玻璃结节的外科治疗策略及疗效分析
武韫1, 吕帆真1, 沈晓咏1, 朱正洪1, 高文1,()   
  1. 1. 200040 上海,复旦大学附属华东医院胸外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-20 出版日期:2016-11-28
  • 通信作者: 高文

Surgical management and outcomes of multifocal ground-glass opacities in elderly patients

Yun Wu1, Fanzheng Luy1, Xiaoyong Shen1, Zhenghong Zhu1, Wen Gao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
  • Received:2016-09-20 Published:2016-11-28
  • Corresponding author: Wen Gao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author:Gao Wen, E-mail:
引用本文:

武韫, 吕帆真, 沈晓咏, 朱正洪, 高文. 老年多发磨玻璃结节的外科治疗策略及疗效分析[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2016, 03(04): 193-198.

Yun Wu, Fanzheng Luy, Xiaoyong Shen, Zhenghong Zhu, Wen Gao. Surgical management and outcomes of multifocal ground-glass opacities in elderly patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Thoracic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 03(04): 193-198.

目的

探讨老年多发磨玻璃结节(GGO)的外科治疗策略及疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2011年1月至2013年1月于复旦大学附属华东医院胸外科收治的78例老年多发GGO患者,根据术前影像学中磨玻璃结节实质部分比例,分为磨玻璃结节(GGO)组34例(C/T<0.5)和实质结节(SN)组44例(C/T>0.5),比较不同手术方式对两组患者总生存率的影响,并分析影响预后的因素。

结果

亚肺叶切除组(37例)3年总生存率为87.3%,肺叶切除组(33例)为85.6%,两组间差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.285,P>0.05);GGO组术后3年总生存率为97.1%,SN组为79.5%,GGO总生存率显著高于SN组(χ2=8.490,P<0.05);T1a组3年总生存率为95.3%,T1b为77.1%,T1a组总生存率显著高于T1b组(χ2=8.490,P<0.05)。术后预后多因素分析提示,结节直径(T)和C/T比与预后密切相关(P<0.05)。

结论

老年多发磨玻璃患者的亚肺叶切除具有与肺叶切除相似的治疗效果,结节直径和C/T比是影响预后的因素。

Objective

To discuss the surgical management and outcomes of multifocal ground-glass opacities (GGO) in elderly patients.

Methods

The clinical data of 78 elderly patients with multifocal GGO treated in Department of Thoracic Surgery, Huadong Hospital affiliated to Fudan University between January 2011 and January 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the consolidation proportion on preoperative imaging findings, 34 patients were classified into GGO group (GGO-dominant lesion, C/T≤0.5), and 44 in SN-group (solid-dominant lesion, C/T>0.5). The effects of different surgical procedures on survival of patients in two groups were compared, and the factors related to outcomes were analyzed.

Results

The 3-year survival in sublobar resection group (n=37) was 87.3%, which was not significantly different from that in standard lobectomy group (n=33, 85.6%)(χ2=1.285, P>0.05). The 3-year survival in GGO group was significantly higher than that in SN group (97.1% vs 79.5%, χ2=8.490, P<0.05). The 3-year survival in T1a group was significantly higher than that in T1b group(95.3% vs 77.1%, χ2=0.660, P<0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that nodular diameter and C/T ratio were closely related to prognosis (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Sublobar resection for multifocal GGO is considered to be an appropriate treatment in the elderly patients as this procedure provides an equivalent long-term outcome in comparison with lobectomy. The nodular diameter and C/T ratio are associated with prognosis.

表1 磨玻璃结节(GGO)组和实质性结节(SN)患者一般资料比较
表2 78例老年磨玻璃结节(GGO)患者的手术资料
表3 磨玻璃结节(GGO)组和实质性结节(SN)患者术后病理资料比较
图1 A:磨玻璃结节(GGO)组和实质性结节(SN)组3年总生存率比较;B:T1a组和T1b组3年总生存率比较
表4 78例老年多发磨玻璃结节(GGO)患者的预后影响因素分析
[1]
VerdecchiaA,CaldoraM,FrovaL. Mortality rate for cancer in Italy:new trends of evolution (years 1970–1999)[R]. Rome: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (ISTAT), 2005 [in Italian].
[2]
BarskySH,GrossmanDA,HoJ, et al. The multifocality of bronchioloalve-olar lung carcinoma: evidence and implications of a multiclonal origin[J]. Mod Pathol,1994,7(6):633-640.
[3]
KimHK,ChoiYS,KimJ,et al. Management of multiple pureground-glass opacity lesions in patients with bronchioloalveolar carcinoma[J]. J Thorac Oncol,2010,5(2):206-210.
[4]
Leslie SobinMGCW. TNM classification of malignant tumors[M]. 7th ed. UICC International Union Against Cancer, 2009.
[5]
AsamuraH,HishidaT,SuzukiK, et al. Japan Clinical OncologyGroup Lung Cancer Surgical Study Group. Radiographically determined noninvasive adenocarcinoma of the lung: survival outcomes of Japan Clinical Oncology Group 0201[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2013,146(1):24–30.
[6]
RiveraC,DahanM,BernardA, et al. Surgical treatment of lung cancer in the octogenarians: results of a nationwide audit[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2011,39(6):981-986.
[7]
SimHJ,ChoiSH,ChaeEJ, et al. Surgical management of pulmonary adenocarcinoma presenting as a pure ground-glass nodule[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2014,46(4):632-636. discussion 636.
[8]
KakinumaR,NoguchiM,AshizawaK, et al. Natural history of pulmonary subsolid nodules: a prospective multicenter study[J].J Thorac Oncol, 2016,11(7):1012-1028.
[9]
ChoJH,ChoiYS,KimJ, et al. Long-term outcomes of wedge resection for pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2015,99(1):218-222.
[10]
GuB,BurtBM,MerrittRE, et al. A dominant ade-nocarcinoma with multifocal ground glass lesions does not behave as advanced disease[J]. Ann Thorac Surg,2013,96(2):411-418.
[11]
MunM,KohnoT. Efficacy of thoracoscopic resection for multifocal bronchi-oloalveolar carcinoma showing pure ground-glass opacities of 20 mm or lessin diameter[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2007,134(4):877-882.
[12]
TsutsuiS,AshizawaK,MinamiK, et al. Multiple focal pure ground-glass opacities on high-resolution CT images: clinical significance in patients with lung cancer[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2010,195(2):W131-W138.
[13]
NakataM,SawadaS,YamashitaM, et al. Surgical treatments for multiple primary adenocarcinoma of the lung[J]. Ann Thorac Surg,2004,78(4):1194-1199.
[14]
RaziSS,JohnMM,SainathanS, et al Sublobar resection is equivalent to lobectomy for T1a non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database analysis[J]. J Surg Res, 2016,200(2):683-689.
[15]
HattoriA,SuzukiK,TakamochiK, et al. Bilateral pulmonary lobectomy feasible in patients with bilateral lung cancers?[J]Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2015,63(7):589-596.
[16]
GirardN,DeshpandeC,LauC, et al. Comprehensive histologic assessment helps to differentiate multiple lung primary nonsmallcell carcinomas from metastases[J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 2009,33(12):1752-1764.
[17]
BonannoL,CalabreseF,NardoG,et al Morphological and genetic heterogeneity in multifocal lung adenocarcinoma: the case of a never-smoker woman[J].Lung Cancer, 2016,96:52-55.
[18]
TakamochiK,OhS,MatsuokaJ, et al. Clonality status of multifocal lung adenocarcinomas based on the mutation patterns of EGFR and K-ras[J]. Lung Cancer, 2012,75(3):313-320.
[1] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[2] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[3] 李婷婷, 吴荷玉, 张悦, 程康, 张晓芳, 程娅婵. 复合保温策略在老年腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术中的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 522-525.
[4] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[5] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[6] 赵宏霞, 刘静, 李晓薇, 陈金婵, 汪志霞. 腹腔镜下经阴道子宫全切术联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗老年子宫脱垂效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 561-565.
[7] 孙伟, 林丽, 师高洋. 超声引导下连续髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞在老年腹股沟疝手术中应用效果比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 593-597.
[8] 张汪, 徐淑英, 张爱华, 夏芬荣, 汪露. 手术室体温护理结合细节护理干预在老年腹股沟疝围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 635-638.
[9] 梁开地, 缑文斌, 莫居容. 肺癌组织中细胞角蛋白18的表达及与预后的相关性[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 688-690.
[10] 杨鹏, 刘冲. PFNA治疗老年股骨转子间骨折后隐匿性失血及其危险因素的横断面研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 301-306.
[11] 单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
[12] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[13] 毛树文, 袁方, 唐昊, 王建民. 针刀调节交感神经对老年胃溃疡患者胃功能和溃疡愈合的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 326-330.
[14] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
[15] 晏美娟, 邵礼晖. 高水平脂蛋白(a)与无“三高”老年人群小动脉硬化型脑小血管病的相关性研究[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 458-463.
阅读次数
全文


摘要