切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胸部外科电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (01) : 31 -37. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8773.2017.01.07

所属专题: 文献

论著

高龄低肺功能肺癌患者的围手术期肺保护
魏常1, 邓娟娟2, 杨为贵2,()   
  1. 1. 430020 湖北武汉市武汉中医医院麻醉科
    2. 430080 湖北华润武钢总医院胸外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-26 出版日期:2017-02-28
  • 通信作者: 杨为贵

Lung protection and perioperative management in senior lung cancer patients with low pulmonary function

Chang Wei1, Juanjuan Deng2, Weigui Yang2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesia, Wuhan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430020, China
    2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Huarun Wugang General Hospital, Wuhan 430080, China
  • Received:2016-09-26 Published:2017-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Weigui Yang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yang Weigui, Email:
引用本文:

魏常, 邓娟娟, 杨为贵. 高龄低肺功能肺癌患者的围手术期肺保护[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2017, 04(01): 31-37.

Chang Wei, Juanjuan Deng, Weigui Yang. Lung protection and perioperative management in senior lung cancer patients with low pulmonary function[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Thoracic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2017, 04(01): 31-37.

目的

探讨高龄低肺功能肺癌患者的围手术期肺保护经验。

方法

回顾性分析2009年1月至2014年6月在华润武钢总医院手术治疗的78例高龄(≥70岁)低肺功能肺癌患者的临床资料,包括患者术前和术后的肺功能指标。分别按照术后是否发生心血管和呼吸系统并发症,以及是否顺利拔除气管插管进行分组。Logistic多因素分析术后拔除气管插管的预后影响因素。

结果

在围手术期所有病例获得治愈。无并发症组与并发症组患者的术前肺功能比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=25.807,P<0.01);术后顺利拔管组和延迟拔管组患者的术前肺功能和手术切除范围比较差异也有统计学意义(χ2=10.953,P=0.027;χ2=7.033,P=0.031)。进一步分析发现,术后顺利拔管组的术前肺功能指标VC%、FEVl%和MVV%均显著高于延迟拔管组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);且术后预测值FEVl%-ppo也显著高于延迟拔管组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。多因素回归分析发现,低肺功能与预后密切相关(P<0.05)。

结论

术前积极改善患者的肺功能,以及术中适当的麻醉处理和个体化的手术方案、合理及时的机械通气是围手术期肺保护的关键,术前肺功能和手术切除范围是影响患者预后的重要因素。

Objective

To investigate the lung protection and perioperative management in senior lung cancer patients with low pulmonary function.

Methods

The clinical data of 78 senior lung cancer patients aged ≥70 years undergoing surgical management in Huarun Wugang General Hospital between January 2009 and June 2014 were retrospectively analyzed, and the pulmonary function parameters before and after operation were retrieved. Patients were grouped according to the occurrence of postoperative cardiovascular and respiratory complications or based on the status of tracheal extubation. The prognostic factors of tracheal extubation after operation were explored by multivariate Logistic analysis.

Results

All patients were cured during perioperation. There were significant differences in preoperative pulmonary function between complication group and non-complication group (χ2=25.807, P<0.01). There were also significant differences in preoperative pulmonary function and resection range between successful extubation group and delayed extubation group (χ2=10.953, P=0.027; χ2=7.033, P=0.031). The preoperative pulmonary function parameters of VC%, FEVl% and MVV% in successful extubation group were significantly higher than those in delayed extubation group (P<0.01), and the postoperative predictive value of FEVl%-ppo in successful extubation group was also significantly higher than that in delayed extubation group(P<0.01). Multivariate Logistic analysis demonstrated that low pulmonary function was closely related to the prognosis (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Preoperative improvement of pulmonary function, appropriate anesthesia management and individualized surgical approach during operation, and optimal postoperative mechanical ventilation are of vital importance to perioperative lung protection among senior lung cancer patients with low pulmonary function. Preoperative pulmonary function and resection range of the lung are associated with prognosis.

表1 术后无并发症组和并发症组患者一般资料比较(例)
表2 术前肺功能指标与术后并发症相关性
表3 术后顺利拔管组、延迟拔管组和机械通气组患者手术资料比较(例)
表4 术后顺利拔除气管插管组和延迟拔管组患者肺功能资料比较
1
Sagerup CM, Smastuen M, Johannesen TB, et al. Increased age and carcimoma not otherwise specified: a 20-year population of 40118 lung cancer patients[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2012,7(1):57-63.
2
Powell HA, Tata LJ, Baldwin DR, et al. Early mortality after surgical resection for lung cancer: an analysis of the English National lung cancer audit[J]. Thorax,2013,68(9):826-834.
3
Varlotto JM, Medford-Davis LN, Recht A, et al,Identification of stage I non-small cell lung cancer patients at high risk for local recurrence following sublobar resection[J]. Chest, 2013 ,143(5):1365-1377.
4
王宇昭,吴楠,陈晋峰,等. 70岁以上老年肺癌手术并发症及相关因素分析[J]. 中华胸心血管外科杂志,2011,27(5):285-288.
5
Fernandes EO, Teixeira C, Silva LC. Thoracic surgery: risk factors for postoperative complications of lung resection[J].Rev Assoc Med Bras, 2011, 57(3): 292-298.
6
Smetana GW. Preoperative pulmonary evaluation[J]. N Engl J Med,1999,340(12) : 937-944.
7
Koizumi K, Haraguchi S, Hirata T, et al. Surgery treatment for lung cancer patients with poor pulmonary function[J]. Ann Tho-rac Cardiovasc, 2005,11(2): 87-92.
8
Linden PA,Bueno R,Colson YL,et al. Lung resection in patients with preoperative FEV1 < 35% predicted[J]. Chest,2005,127(6) : 1984-1990.
9
Chae EJ, Kim N, Seo JB, et al. Prediction of postoperative lung function in patients undergoing lung resection: dual-energy perfusion computed tomography versus perfusion scintigraphy[J]. Invest Radiol, 2013 ,48(8):622-627.
10
王天佑. 胸外科围手术期肺保护的专家共识[J].中华外科杂志,2009,47(18):1361-1364.
11
查鹏,王天龙. 脆弱肺功能患者围手术期肺功能保护[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2013,34(7):620-625.
12
Brunelli A, Refai MA, Salati M, et a1. Carbon monoxide lung dnfusion capacity improves risk stratification in padents without flow limitation:evidence for systematic measurement before lungresection[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2006 ,29(4):567-570.
13
方文涛,茅腾,徐美英. 优化老年患者胸部手术围手术期管理策略的临床研究[J]. 中华外科杂志,2009,47(14):1048-1051.
14
Griffin JP,Eastridge CE,Tolley EA,et al. Wedge resection for nonsmall cell lung cancer in patients with pulmonary insufficiency:prospective ten -year survival[J]. J Thorac Oncol,2006,1 (9):960-964.
15
黄邵洪.谷力加.翁毅敏,等.肺癌肺叶袖状切除的安全性和有效性[J].中国肿瘤临床,2005,32(5):38-41.
16
Castillo MD, Heerdt PM. Pulmonary resection in the elderly[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol,2007,20(1):4-9.
17
Win T,Jackson A,Sharples L. Relationship between pulmonary function and lung cancer surgical outcome[J].Eur Respir J,2005,25(4):594-599.
[1] 宋玟焱, 杜美君, 陈佳丽, 石冰, 黄汉尧. 唇腭裂手术围手术期疼痛管理的研究进展及基于生物材料治疗新方法的展望[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 397-405.
[2] 李想, 郭征, 田洪哲, 李杜, 熊梦瑶, 潘铁军. 1 470 nm半导体激光减容性切除治疗高危前列腺增生的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 448-452.
[3] 沈琪乐, 赵勤华, 宫素岗, 刘锦铭, 王岚, 邱宏玲. COPD 稳定期患者血清CC16 蛋白表达与肺功能、肺气肿表型的关系分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 690-695.
[4] 袁延丽, 屈卓军, 崔会慧, 王菁, 高贝贝, 潘院. 原发性肺癌切除术后谵妄的危险因素及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 701-706.
[5] 井发红, 李丽娜, 高婷, 高艳梅, 杨楠, 李卓, 慕玉东. 肺癌立体定向放疗血清SAP 和MMPs 表达及临床意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 707-713.
[6] 邢嘉翌, 龚佳晟, 祝佳佳, 陆群. 肺癌化疗患者继发肺部感染的病原菌耐药性及炎症因子变化分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 714-718.
[7] 杨慧, 郭丽娟, 冯晓丹, 李静, 黄成谋, 蔡兴锐, 覃英娇, 王远礼. 非小细胞肺癌铂类药物耐药mi RNA表达特征及预测分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 719-724.
[8] 张卫锋, 张天翼, 赵正维, 王海强, 尹逊亮. VE /VCO2 斜率对肺癌肺叶切除术后心血管并发症的预测意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 725-730.
[9] 赖淼, 景鑫, 李桂珍, 李怡. 非小细胞肺癌EGFR 突变亚型的临床病理和预后意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 731-737.
[10] 杨莎莎, 张毛为, 孙宜田, 刘亚南, 位娟, 魏建, 陈碧. 结缔组织疾病相关间质性肺病并发小气道功能障碍临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 738-743.
[11] 梁丽斯, 李洁, 贺帅, 来艳君, 刘铭, 张琳. MMP-9、MMP-2 及TLR4、HE4对非小细胞肺癌早期诊断意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 756-761.
[12] 郭璟琪, 魏明言, 刘芳, 李冬凌, 关金平, 李立华. 乙酰半胱氨酸治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 768-772.
[13] 刘一鸣, 温佳新, 赵恺, 薛志强. ⅢA 期肺腺癌新辅助治疗后胸腔镜右肺中下叶切除术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 311-313.
[14] 刘卓, 张宗明, 张翀, 刘立民, 赵月, 齐晖. 腹腔镜手术治疗高龄急性梗阻性化脓性胆管炎患者的安全性与术式选择[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 795-800.
[15] 闫维, 张二明, 张克, 安欣华, 向平超. 北京市石景山区40岁及以上居民早期慢性阻塞性肺疾病异质性及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 533-540.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?