切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胸部外科电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (01) : 43 -48. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8773.2017.01.09

所属专题: 文献

论著

靶区勾画对125I放射性粒子植入治疗非小细胞肺癌效果的影响
吕金爽1, 关志宇1,(), 郑广钧1, 石树远1, 朱晓雷1   
  1. 1. 300211 天津医科大学第二医院胸外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-11-10 出版日期:2017-02-28
  • 通信作者: 关志宇

Efficacy analysis of different target area selection in implantation of 125I radioactive seeds in non-small cell lung cancer

Jinshuang Lyu1, Zhiyu Guan1,(), Guangjun Zheng1, Shuyuan Shi1, Xiaolei Zhu1   

  1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The 2nd Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China
  • Received:2016-11-10 Published:2017-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Zhiyu Guan
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Guan Zhiyu, Email:
引用本文:

吕金爽, 关志宇, 郑广钧, 石树远, 朱晓雷. 靶区勾画对125I放射性粒子植入治疗非小细胞肺癌效果的影响[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2017, 04(01): 43-48.

Jinshuang Lyu, Zhiyu Guan, Guangjun Zheng, Shuyuan Shi, Xiaolei Zhu. Efficacy analysis of different target area selection in implantation of 125I radioactive seeds in non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Thoracic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2017, 04(01): 43-48.

目的

探讨非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)125I放射性粒子植入术中靶区的勾画对术后疗效的影响。

方法

选取自2012年1月至2014年12月在天津医科大学第二医院接受治疗的经病理学明确诊断的NSCLC患者60例,根据入组编号将患者分为两组,每组30例,组1依据胸部CT肺窗沿瘤体边缘直接勾画靶区,应用治疗计划系统(TPS)制定术前计划,指导术中125I放射性粒子植入;组2按照胸部CT肺窗沿瘤体边缘再外放0.5 cm认定为靶区,根据此靶区制定术前计划,再行125I放射性粒子植入。术后定期复查胸部CT及肺功能,比较两组患者肿瘤原位复发率及出现放射性肺损伤(RIPD)的情况,随访期为1年。根据术后第6个月时复查胸部CT结果,与粒子植入前进行比较,按照实体肿瘤疗效评价标准判定疗效。

结果

全部患者顺利完成粒子植入治疗,随访期内无死亡病例。组1与组2的有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(86.7% vs 90.0%;χ2=0.991,P=0.326);组1的肿瘤原位复发率显著高于组2,差异有统计学意义(20.0% vs 6.7%;χ2=2.071,P=0.043)。两组患者术后与术前肺功能指标FEV1%和DLCO%比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

按照胸部CT肺窗将沿瘤体边界外放0.5 cm后进行肺癌125I粒子植入,可减少肿瘤原位复发,且不会影响治疗效果及引发明显肺功能损伤。

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of different target area selection in implantation of 125I radioactive seeds in treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

Sixty patients with non-small cell lung cancer confirmed by pathology undergoing treatment in The 2nd Hospital of Tianjin Medical University between January 2012 and December 2014 were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups according to the sequence number, with 30 patients in each group. In group 1, target area was defined along the tumor margin based on lung-window CT, and treatment plan system (TPS) was used to make pre-operative plans and guide the implantation process of 125I radioactive seeds. In group 2, target area was extended by 0.5 cm in all dimensions outside the tumor margin based on lung-window CT, and TPS was also used with the same implantation method. Patients were followed up for one year, chest CT and pulmonary function examinations were conducted, and the locoregional recurrence rate and status of radiation-induced pulmonary damage were observed in two groups. Chest CT examination performed 6 months after operation was utilized to evaluate the treatment efficacy according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors.

Results

All patients went through implantation procedure successfully, with no death during follow-up. There was no significant difference in effective rate between two groups (86.7% vs 90.0%; χ2=0.991, P=0.326). The recurrence rate in group 1 was significantly higher than that in group 2 (20.0% vs 6.7%; χ2=2.071, P=0.043). There was no significant difference between preoperative and postoperative lung function indicators of FEV1% and DLCO% in two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Extending the target area by 0.5 cm outside the tumor margin in implantation of 125I radioactive seeds in treatment of non-small cell lung cancer can reduce the risk of locoregional recurrence, with no effect on treatment efficacy and no obvious radioactive lung injury.

图1 肿瘤靶区的勾画。A:按照病灶边缘勾画靶区;B:按照病灶边缘外扩0.5 cm勾画靶区
表1 两组患者基线资料比较[(n(%)]
图2 术后剂量验证。A:按照病灶边缘勾画靶区粒子术后DVH图剂量验证;B:按照病灶边缘外扩0.5 cm勾画靶区粒子术后DVH图剂量验证
表2 两组患者术后剂量参数比较(±s)
表3 两组患者术前、术后第3个月的肺功能指标比较(±s)
1
Hu XK, Wang MY. The study of curing central-type lung cancer by CT-guided percutaneous embedding of 125I seeds[J]. Chin J Radio, 2004, 38(9): 910-915.
2
时代,张雪宁,牛冬梅,等. CT引导下单纯125I粒子植入治疗中晚期非小细胞肺癌的近期疗效观察[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2013,24(4):283-285.
3
魏巍,沈啸洪,孙慧慧,等. 放射性125I粒子植入治疗非小细胞肺癌近期疗效的多因素分析[J]. 中华内科杂志,2012,51(12):978-981.
4
骆红蕾,喻晓娟,李进,等. 125I粒子植入联合化疗治疗同期放化疗后局部复发的Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志,2013,33(3):195-198.
5
吕金爽,杨景魁,郑广钧,等. CT引导下放射性粒子植入治疗恶性纤维组织细胞瘤肺转移瘤临床疗效研究[J].中国肿瘤临床,2013,(7):407-409.
6
曹驰 程隆 于大海,等. CT引导下经皮穿刺125I粒子植入治疗肺转移癌的临床应用[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志,2013,33(1):46-48.
7
申文江. 放射性粒子植入的现状与进展[J]. 中国微创外科杂志,2007, 7(2): 118-119.
8
郭永涛,张遵城,董华,等. 符合线路SPECT/CT在肺癌125I粒子治疗中的应用[J]. 山东医药,2012, 52(40): 14-15,19.
9
李小东,李亚明. 重视放射性粒子植入治疗的规范化[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志,2013, 33(4): 241-242.
10
赵楠,杨瑞杰,王俊杰. 125I放射性粒子植入计划定制研究[J]. 中华放射医学与防护杂志,2014, 34(1): 54-58.
11
李小东,张遵城,郑广钧,等. 肺癌125I粒子近距离治疗放射剂量学质量控制与保证的策略研究[J]. 中国肿瘤临床,2014, 18: 1185-1189.
12
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009, 45(2):228-247.
13
Wang JJ, Xiu DR, Ran WQ, et al. Interstitial implantation of radioactive seed for treating carcinoma[M].2nd ed. Beijing: Health Sciences Asia, Elsevier Science, 2004, 66-97.
14
Parashar B, Patel P, Monni S. Limited resection followed by intraoperative seed implantation is comparable to stereotactic body radiotherapy for solitary lung cancer[J]. Cancer, 2010, 116(21): 5047-5053.
15
Nag S, Bice WS, Dewyngaert K, et a1. The American  Branchytherapy Society recommendation for permant protate branchytherapy postimplant dosimetricx analysis[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2000, 46(1): 221-230.
16
Nag S, Ellis RJ, Merrick GS, et al. American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for reporting morbidity after prostate brachytherapy[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2002, 54(2):462-470.
17
Imamura F, Chatani M, Nakayama T, et al. Percutaneous  brachytherapy for small-sized non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Lung Cancer, 1999, 24(3): 169-174.
18
Johnson M, Colonias A, Parda D, et al. Dosimetric and  technical aspects of intraoperative I-125 brachytherapy for stage Ⅰ non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Phys Med Biol, 2007,52(5): 1237-1245.
[1] 朱超男, 王帅, 王文博, 郑贸根, 程远, 陈志全. 非小细胞肺癌患者组织miR-31-5p表达与临床病理特征及预后的关系[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 508-510.
[2] 陈坤, 何傅梅, 方婷, 陈文瑞. 血清sCD73与EGFR/ALK野生型非小细胞肺癌免疫治疗效果的相关性分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 504-507.
[3] 黄承路, 廖飞, 刘显平, 王志强. 血清外泌体Has_circ_0060937过度表达与NSCLC转移和不良预后的关系[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 490-494.
[4] 徐天亮, 程干思, 吴亚平, 龚荣, 胡洁, 段群娣, 李承慧. 奥希替尼联合安罗替尼二线治疗转移性NSCLC的疗效分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 520-522.
[5] 魏婷婷, 胡小红, 龚自强, 熊鹿. 老年非小细胞肺癌组织ARPC2表达及与预后关系[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 584-586.
[6] 杜静怡, 徐兴祥. 循环肿瘤细胞在非小细胞肺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 596-600.
[7] 杨豪, 王云川, 陈有英. 硬膜外阻滞复合羟考酮镇痛在非小细胞肺癌患者中的应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 370-372.
[8] 仇丽敏, 胡航, 孙云浩, 孙健, 陈婷婷. NSCLC患者根治性切除术后复发风险分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 242-244.
[9] 邹琴, 龙玲, 叶容, 张小洪. PD-1抑制剂免疫治疗NSCLC所致反应性毛细血管增生症的研究进展[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 278-280.
[10] 李多, 郝昭昭, 陈延伟, 南岩东. Wnt/β-Catenin通路促进非小细胞肺癌转移机制研究进展[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 281-284.
[11] 李咏生, 孙建国, 李梦侠, 重庆肺癌精准治疗协作组(CPLOG). 第三代EGFR-TKI耐药后诊疗策略专家共识[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 145-155.
[12] 李一然, 王玉秀, 朱研, 王梦, 刘颖, 闫文锦, 徐兴祥, 闵凌峰. 基于GEO数据库分析影响纳武单抗及派姆单抗治疗非小细胞肺癌疗效的差异基因[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(01): 20-25.
[13] 钱小卫, 丁海兵, 游继军, 王熠, 卞小霞. 微小miR水平联合检测在非小细胞肺癌转移中的意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(01): 47-50.
[14] 汪涛, 朱浩雨, 卜青松, 胡磊, 王文娟, 方阮, 刘啸峰. 非小细胞肺癌EGFR突变状态与CT特征的相关性[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(01): 51-54.
[15] 单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
阅读次数
全文


摘要