切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胸部外科电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (03) : 155 -158. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8773.2017.03.05

所属专题: 文献

论著

术中液体入量速度对肺切除术后患者肺部并发症的影响
吴益和1, 胡坚1,()   
  1. 1. 310003 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第一医院胸外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-10 出版日期:2017-08-28
  • 通信作者: 胡坚
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81441079); 浙江省重大科技专项计划项目(2014C03032); 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2014KYB094)

Effect of the intraoperative infusion rate of fluids on postoperative pulmonary complications after pneumonectomy

Yihe Wu1, Jian Hu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China
  • Received:2017-05-10 Published:2017-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Jian Hu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Hu Jian, Email:
引用本文:

吴益和, 胡坚. 术中液体入量速度对肺切除术后患者肺部并发症的影响[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2017, 04(03): 155-158.

Yihe Wu, Jian Hu. Effect of the intraoperative infusion rate of fluids on postoperative pulmonary complications after pneumonectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Thoracic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2017, 04(03): 155-158.

目的

探讨术中液体入量速度对肺手术患者术后肺部并发症的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月1日—3月15日在浙江大学医学院附属第一医院行解剖性肺切除术的患者125例,有效纳入病例98例,按术中液体入量速度分为低滴速组(液体入量速度<7.5 ml·kg1·h1,n=35)、中滴速组(液体入量速度7.5~10.5 ml·kg1·h1,n=40)和高滴速组(液体入量速度>10.5 ml·kg1·h1,n=23)。比较三组患者术后肺部并发症发生率、住院天数和院内病死率的差异。

结果

低滴速组、中滴速组和高滴速组患者术后肺部并发症发生率分别为45.7%(16/35)、20.0%(8/40)和43.5%(10/23),中滴速组并发症发生率显著低于其他两组,差异有统计学意义(P>0.05)。三组患者术后均无死亡病例,三组间术后平均住院天数比较差异也无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

在行解剖性肺切除术时,术中液体入量速度控制在7.5~10.5 ml·kg-1·h-1有助于减少患者肺部并发症的发生,应引起胸外科医生和麻醉医师的足够重视与关注。

Objective

To study the effect of the intraoperative infusion rate of fluids on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients who went under pneumonectomy.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 125 patients with anatomic pneumonectomy from January 1 to March 15, 2017 at the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University. 98 cases were effectively included and were divided into three groups according the intraoperative infusion rate of fluids: low infusion rate group (<7.5 ml·kg-1·h-1, n=35), medium infusion rate group (7.5-10.5 ml·kg-1·h-1, n=40) high infusion rate group (> 10.5 ml·kg-1·h-1, n=23). The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, hospital stay and hospital mortality were compared between the three groups.

Results

The incidence of pulmonary complications in each group was 45.7% (16/35) in the low infusion rate group, 20.0% (8/40) in the medium infusion rate group and 43.5% (10/23) in the high infusion rate group. The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications was significantly lower in the medium infusion rate group than in the low infusion rate group and the high infusion rate group (P<0.05). No death cases were found in the three groups. There was no significant difference in the average length of hospital stay between the three groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

In the course of anatomic pneumonectomy, the intraoperative infusion rate of fluids controlled at 7.5-10.5 ml·kg-1 ·h-1 can help to reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients, which should cause the thoracic surgeons and anesthesiologists to pay enough attention.

表1 不同术中液体入量速度患者基本资料比较(±s)
表2 不同术中液体入量速度对术后肺部并发症和住院天数的影响(±s)
1
Arslantas MK, Kara HV, Tuncer BB, et al. Effect of the amount of intraoperative fluid administration on postoperative pulmonary complications following anatomic lung resections[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2015, 149(1): 314-320, 321 e311.
2
Zeldin RA, Normandin D, Landtwing D, et al. Postpneumonectomy pulmonary edema[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1984, 87(3): 359-365.
3
Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Secher NH, Kehlet H. 'Liberal' vs. 'restrictive' perioperative fluid therapy--a critical assessment of the evidence[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2009, 53(7): 843-851.
4
Gao T, Li N, Zhang JJ, et al. Restricted intravenous fluid regimen reduces the rate of postoperative complications and alters immunological activity of elderly patients operated for abdominal cancer: a randomized prospective clinical trail[J]. World J Surg, 2012, 36(5): 993-1002.
5
Matot I, Dery E, Bulgov Y, et al. Fluid management during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung resection: a randomized, controlled trial of effects on urinary output and postoperative renal function[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2013, 146(2): 461-466.
6
Kozower BD, Sheng S, O'Brien SM, et al. STS database risk models: predictors of mortality and major morbidity for lung cancer resection[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2010, 90(3): 875-881; discussion 881-873.
7
Kutlu CA, Williams EA, Evans TW, et al. Acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome after pulmonary resection[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2000, 69(2): 376-380.
8
Ferguson MK, Vigneswaran WT. Diffusing capacity predicts morbidity after lung resection in patients without obstructive lung disease[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2008, 85(4): 1158-1164; discussion 1164-1155.
9
Wilson H, Gammon D, Routledge T, et al. Clinical and quality of life outcomes following anatomical lung resection for lung cancer in high-risk patients[J]. Ann Thorac Med, 2017, 12(2): 83-87.
10
Dickhoff C, Dahele M, Hashemi SM, et al. Surgical treatment of complications after high-dose chemoradiotherapy for lung cancer[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2017, 104(2): 436-442.
11
Cavalheri V, Granger C. Preoperative exercise training for patients with non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017: CD012020.
12
Adeniji K, Steel AC. The pathophysiology of perioperative lung injury[J]. Anesthesiol Clin, 2012, 30(4): 573-590.
13
Zhu YQ, Fang F, Ling XM, et al. Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2017, 9(5): 1303-1309.
14
Licker M, Fauconnet P, Villiger Y, et al. Acute lung injury and outcomes after thoracic surgery[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2009, 22(1): 61-67.
15
Alam N1, Park BJ, Wilton A, et al. Incidence and risk factors for lung injury after lung cancer resection[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2007, 84(4): 1085-1091; discussion 1091.
[1] 吕立志, 张小进, 蔡秋程, 江艺. 原位肝移植逆灌注法对术后肺部并发症的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2011, 05(01): 3-6.
[2] 欧红梅, 朱云祥, 张琳, 张小英, 高敏, 张红艳. 呼吸功能训练对食管裂孔疝术后患者康复效果的研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(06): 471-473.
[3] 周茂菁, 沈勤, 柏耀林. 肺部病灶切除术后舒芬太尼复合罗哌卡镇痛效果分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(03): 427-429.
[4] 王倩, 王振华, 鲁静, 龚太乾, 陶莎, 王丽娇, 范博士. 医用多功能胸带在胸腹腔镜联合食管癌围术期的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(06): 753-756.
[5] 王洁茹, 路志红. 全麻拔管前肺复张对腹腔镜妇科手术患者恢复室内肺部并发症的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(01): 96-97.
[6] 唐丽丽, 高林春. 左或右半肺切除术患者生命质量的分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(04): 423-426.
[7] 李琴. 脊髓损伤患者肺部并发症的康复计划[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(01): 93-95.
[8] 李金泽, 邱海波, 潘纯. 高流量鼻导管氧疗在术后脱机患者预防急性呼吸衰竭中的研究进展[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2019, 05(03): 264-267.
[9] 中国老年医学学会麻醉学分会. 老年患者术后肺部并发症防治专家共识[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 7-22.
[10] 徐建峰, 周军庆, 魏德胜, 王彬, 傅林海, 李铸鹏, 喻光懋. 食管癌术后肺部并发症的预测与对策[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2020, 07(04): 224-232.
[11] 吴灿兴, 胡树桥, 马骏, 林洁桓, 陈福楠. 肺癌术后肺部并发症的预测因素分析[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2019, 06(04): 229-233.
[12] 杜杰, 张绍明, 徐小平, 陈界, 汪雷. 高龄食管癌患者术后肺部并发症的防治[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2015, 02(04): 241-244.
[13] 黄佳, 谭强, 林皓, 钱立强, 陆佩吉, 丁征平, 罗清泉. 肺切除术后支气管胸膜瘘的外科治疗[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2014, 01(01): 30-34.
阅读次数
全文


摘要