切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胸部外科电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 181 -188. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8773.2026.03.02

论著

机器人辅助胸腔镜手术治疗非小细胞肺癌的围手术期和长期生存结局:基于上海市胸科医院13年临床实践的真实世界研究
黄佳, 潘汉博, 田禹, 沈凡, 林凯临, 李剑涛, 林皓, 陈天翔, 成兴华, 罗清泉†()   
  1. 200030 上海,上海交通大学医学院附属胸科医院肿瘤外科
  • 收稿日期:2026-04-29 修回日期:2026-06-11 接受日期:2026-08-13 出版日期:2026-08-28
  • 通信作者: 罗清泉
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(82573557); 上海市自然科学基金(24ZR1464400)

Perioperative outcomes and long-term survival of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world study based on thirteen-year clinical practice in Shanghai Chest Hospital

Jia Huang, Hanbo Pan, Yu Tian, Fan Shen, Kailin Lin, Jiantao Li, Hao Lin, Tianxiang Chen, Xinghua Cheng, Qingquan Luo†()   

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200030, China
  • Received:2026-04-29 Revised:2026-06-11 Accepted:2026-08-13 Published:2026-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Qingquan Luo
引用本文:

黄佳, 潘汉博, 田禹, 沈凡, 林凯临, 李剑涛, 林皓, 陈天翔, 成兴华, 罗清泉. 机器人辅助胸腔镜手术治疗非小细胞肺癌的围手术期和长期生存结局:基于上海市胸科医院13年临床实践的真实世界研究[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2026, 13(03): 181-188.

Jia Huang, Hanbo Pan, Yu Tian, Fan Shen, Kailin Lin, Jiantao Li, Hao Lin, Tianxiang Chen, Xinghua Cheng, Qingquan Luo. Perioperative outcomes and long-term survival of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world study based on thirteen-year clinical practice in Shanghai Chest Hospital[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Thoracic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 13(03): 181-188.

目的

基于上海市胸科医院13年临床实践,分析机器人辅助胸腔镜手术(RATS)治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的围手术期和远期生存结局。

方法

回顾性收集2009年5月至2022年5月于上海市胸科医院接受RATS肺部手术的连续NSCLC病例,分析患者基本信息、围手术期情况和长期生存结局。

结果

共纳入1 798例患者,其中男性786例(43.7%)、女性1 012例(56.3%),平均年龄(59.4±9.1)岁。叶切、段切和楔切分别为1 557(86.6%)、112(6.2%)和129(7.2%)例。肿瘤平均直径(2.4±1.1)cm,以腺癌为最常见病理类型(90.3%)。手术平均时长(101.9±28.5)min,80.9%的患者出血量≤100 mL,中转开胸率3.8%,99.2%的患者达到阴性切缘。术中淋巴结清扫平均站数5.5±1.6和平均个数(11.2±5.2)枚。术后胸管平均引流量(710.5±268.3) mL、引流时间(3.2±1.8)天,术后平均住院时间(4.5±2.1)天。术后有332例(18.5%)患者出现并发症、其中23例(1.3%)为严重并发症。生存结局分析表明,RATS患者术后5年无复发生存率为82.5%、总生存率为88.8%。进一步多因素Cox回归分析显示年龄、病理类型、病理TNM分期和新辅助治疗史是影响患者无复发生存和总生存的独立预后因素。

结论

RATS术中出血量少、中转开胸率低、术后并发症率低、长期生存结果较好。RATS在本中心经验中显示出较好的围手术期安全性和可接受的长期肿瘤学结局,是治疗NSCLC的可行手术方式。

Objective

To analyze the perioperative and long-term survival outcomes of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) in the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on the 13-year clinical practice at Shanghai Chest Hospital.

Methods

Consecutive patients with NSCLC who underwent RATS lung surgery at Shanghai Chest Hospital from May 2009 to May 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. Baseline demographic characteristics, perioperative parameters, and long-term survival outcomes were analyzed.

Results

A total of 1 798 patients were included, consisting of 786 males (43.7%) and 1 012 females (56.3%), with a mean age of (59.4±9.1) years. There were 1 557 cases (86.6%) of lobectomy, 112 cases (6.2%) of segmentectomy, and 129 cases (7.2%) of wedge resection. The mean tumor diameter was (2.4±1.1) cm, and adenocarcinoma accounted for the predominant pathological type (90.3%). The mean operative duration was (101.9±28.5) minutes. 80.9% of patients had intraoperative blood loss ≤100 mL, the conversion rate to thoracotomy was 3.8%, and 99.2% of patients achieved negative surgical margins. The mean number of dissected lymph node stations was 5.5±1.6, with a mean of 11.2±5.2 lymph nodes retrieved. The mean postoperative chest tube drainage volume was (710.5±268.3) mL over a mean drainage duration of (3.2±1.8) days, and the mean postoperative hospital stay was (4.5±2.1) days. Postoperative complications occurred in 332 patients (18.5%), among whom 23 cases (1.3%) had severe complications. Survival analysis revealed that the 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate and overall survival (OS) rate were 82.5% and 88.8%, respectively. Further multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that age, histological subtype, pathological TNM stage, and neoadjuvant therapy were independent prognostic factors for RFS and OS.

Conclusions

RATS is associated with limited intraoperative blood loss, a low conversion rate to thoracotomy, a low postoperative complication rate, and favorable long-term survival outcomes. In our center’s clinical experience, RATS demonstrates favorable perioperative safety profiles and acceptable long-term oncological outcomes, making it a viable surgical approach for NSCLC.

图1 研究流程图。ECOG:美国东部肿瘤协作组;RATS:机器人辅助胸腔镜手术;NSCLC:非小细胞肺癌
表1 患者基线信息
表2 患者围手术期结局
图2 患者Kaplan-Meier生存曲线。A:无复发生存;B:总生存
图3 依据切除方式的亚组分析Kaplan-Meier生存曲线。A:肺叶切除患者无复发生存;B:肺叶切除患者总生存;C:肺段切除患者无复发生存;D:肺段切除患者总生存;E:楔形切除患者无复发生存;F:楔形切除患者总生存
图4 依据病理类型的亚组分析Kaplan-Meier生存曲线。A:腺癌患者无复发生存;B:腺癌患者总生存;C:鳞癌/其他类型患者无复发生存;D:鳞癌/其他类型患者总生存
图5 依据病理分期的亚组分析Kaplan-Meier生存曲线。A:病理ⅠA~ⅠB期患者无复发生存;B:病理ⅠA~ⅠB期患者总生存;C:病理ⅡA~ⅡB期患者无复发生存;D:病理ⅡA~ⅡB期患者总生存;E:病理ⅢA~ⅢB期患者无复发生存;F:病理ⅢA~ⅢB期患者总生存
表3 患者生存结局的多因素Cox分析
1
Luo G, Zhang Y, Rumgay H, et al. Estimated worldwide variation and trends in incidence of lung cancer by histological subtype in 2022 and over time: a population-based study[J]. Lancet Respir Med, 2025, 13(4): 348-363.
2
Howington J, Souter LH, Arenberg D, et al. Management of Patients With Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline[J]. Chest, 2025, 168(3): 810-827.
3
Dixon LK, Barber E, Cook A, et al. Sublobar resection or lobectomy for stage Ia non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMJ Open Respir Res, 2025, 12(1): e003234.
4
Zhao XJ, Qian LQ, Lin H, et al. Robot-assisted lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer in china: initial experience and techniques[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2010, 2(1): 26-28.
5
Pan H, Zou N, Tian Y, et al. Robotic Versus Thoracoscopic Sub-lobar Resection for Octogenarians with Clinical Stage ⅠA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Real-World Study[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2024, 31(3): 1568-1580.
6
Liang LJ, Qi GY, Pan ZL. Robot-assisted versus video-assisted surgery for early functional recovery in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-based matching studies[J]. J Robot Surg, 2026, 20(1): 306.
7
Pan H, Tian Y, Wang H, et al. Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted, Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic and Open Lobectomy for Patients with N1-Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Study[J]. Cancers (Basel), 2022, 14(21): 5249.
8
Pan H, Gu Z, Tian Y, et al. Propensity score-matched comparison of robotic- and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, and open lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer patients aged 75 years or older[J]. Front Oncol, 2022, 12: 1009298.
9
Pan H, Zhu H, Tian Y, et al. Quality of lymph node dissection and early recurrence in robotic versus thoracoscopic lobectomy for stage N1-2 non-small cell lung cancer: Eleven-year real-world data from a high-volume center[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2024, 50(9): 108496.
10
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience[J]. Ann Surg, 2009, 250(2): 187-196.
11
Olawaiye AB, Baker TP, Washington MK, et al. The new (Version 9) American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor, node, metastasis staging for cervical cancer[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(4): 287-298.
12
Wang P, Fu YH, Qi HF, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted and video assisted thoracic surgery for early non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis[J]. Technol Health Care, 2024, 32(2): 511-523.
13
Jin R, Zheng Y, Yuan Y, et al. Robotic-assisted Versus Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: Short-term Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial (RVlob Trial)[J]. Ann Surg, 2022, 275(2): 295-302.
14
Ueno H, Imamura Y, Okado S, et al. Lobectomy for primary lung cancer: a comparison of perioperative and postoperative outcomes between robot-assisted thoracic surgery and video-assisted thoracic surgery[J]. Surg Today, 2025, 55(8): 1162-1172.
15
Kent MS, Hartwig MG, Vallières E, et al. Pulmonary Open, Robotic, and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy (PORTaL) Study: An Analysis of 5721 Cases[J]. Ann Surg, 2023, 277(3): 528-533.
16
Sbeih D, Idkedek M, Abu Akar F. Video-Assisted vs. Robotic-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Lung Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques and Outcomes[J]. J Clin Med, 2025, 14(5): 1598.
17
Chen D, Kang P, Tao S, et al. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for operable non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Lung Cancer, 2021, 153: 99-107.
18
Mirza W, Javid A, Khan ME, et al. Robotic-assisted vs video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on surgical quality, perioperative, and oncologic outcomes[J]. J Robot Surg, 2025, 19(1): 651.
19
Kubouchi Y, Wada T, Yasuda R, et al. Comparison of thoracotomy conversion rates and causes between VATS and RATS for primary lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2026, 74(4): 390-399.
20
Tanaka Y, Tane S, Doi T, et al. Factors affecting the short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer[J]. Surg Today, 2024, 54(8): 874-881.
21
Perez C, Weiser L, Knabe K, et al. Robotic-assisted left upper lobe S2 segmentectomy: Identification of vascular and bronchial anatomy[J]. JTCVS Tech, 2025, 31: 185-187.
[1] 李秋韵, 王爽. 基于CT影像学评估非小细胞肺癌免疫治疗疗效的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(04): 705-709.
[2] 李春艳, 郎广碧, 周亚, 陈晓龙, 胡明冬. 胸部SMARCA4缺失型非小细胞肺癌与SMARCA4缺失型未分化肿瘤的组织病理学特征、影像学表现及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(04): 534-541.
[3] 刘慧, 赵燕霞, 汪海涛, 魏肖慧, 魏雪梅. CT肿瘤内部异质性对NSCLC患者免疫治疗反应性的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(04): 560-565.
[4] 黄丛秀, 王少军, 郁志龙, 苏乌云, 刘彩霞, 孙晓革. 局部晚期非小细胞肺癌放疗联合免疫治疗并发治疗相关性肺炎的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(04): 566-571.
[5] 李洋, 陈雨欣, 高娜, 李继霞, 米晶晶, 贺元, 曹鸿鑫. 不同剂量贝伐珠单抗联合培美曲塞及铂类药物治疗晚期NSCLC疗效与安全性倾向性匹配分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(04): 578-585.
[6] 丁海斌, 刘爽, 乔丹, 李新涛, 陈艳妮, 程蒿, 刘佳. 外周血炎症指数预测148例局部晚期NSCLC免疫化疗后MPR的临床意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(04): 600-606.
[7] 陈玥, 吴丙琳, 冯妮娜, 杨勤秦, 苗雄伟, 尚苗苗, 马静, 王欢, 任巧微. 中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值预测免疫治疗联合化疗晚期NSCLC患者预后的临床意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(04): 607-614.
[8] 许猛军, 殷海涛, 史凌云, 马高磊, 张英楠, 郭雯雯, 王曼, 张静雅, 刘枫, 陈远远. 不同剂量调强放疗对144例局部晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 476-479.
[9] 陈希, 范海华, 倪婷婷, 宋丽, 邵丽丽. cfDNA、NLR及PD-L1联合检测对42例非小细胞肺癌患者免疫治疗疗效的预测意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 405-410.
[10] 毛燕青, 张妤, 付婷, 王翎, 王娟, 梁容瑞. Revolution CT能谱成像技术联合p53、GAGE7表达在非小细胞肺癌诊断中临床意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 431-436.
[11] 姬雅君, 闫立华, 张庚, 孙文波, 杨丽娜. 布托啡诺复合瑞马唑仑用于非小细胞肺癌单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的临床效果研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(02): 262-268.
[12] 刘佳铭, 文健, 孙晓容, 钟瑶, 张雯. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并肺癌免疫检查点抑制剂相关重症皮疹一例[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(02): 353-355.
[13] 乔伟, 周前鑫, 苏悦, 马源, 赵沙. 动态免疫特征预测晚期非小细胞肺癌免疫疗法治疗肺孢子菌感染风险的研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(02): 181-188.
[14] 杨晓冬, 王子鸣, 赵德平, 朱余明. 单中心机器人辅助肺段切除术的安全性与可行性:一项回顾性分析[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2026, 13(02): 102-111.
[15] 余绍斌, 康明强. ⅠA3期非小细胞肺癌预后差异及治疗策略研究进展[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2026, 13(02): 132-139.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?