切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胸部外科电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (03) : 173 -180. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8773.2022.03.08

论著

磁性括约肌增强器治疗胃食管反流病术后不良反应与处理策略
孙益峰1, 姜皓耀1, 顾海勇1, 杨洋1, 何毅1, 李斌1, 李志刚1,()   
  1. 1. 200030 上海,上海市胸科医院(上海交通大学附属胸科医院)胸外科食管亚专科
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-25 修回日期:2022-06-12 接受日期:2022-07-22 出版日期:2022-08-28
  • 通信作者: 李志刚
  • 基金资助:
    上海市科委课题(20Y11909200)

Management strategies of adverse reactions to magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease

Yifeng Sun1, Haoyao Jiang1, Haiyong Gu1, Yang Yang1, Yi He1, Bin Li1, Zhigang Li1,()   

  1. 1. Section of Esophageal Surgery, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China
  • Received:2022-04-25 Revised:2022-06-12 Accepted:2022-07-22 Published:2022-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Zhigang Li
引用本文:

孙益峰, 姜皓耀, 顾海勇, 杨洋, 何毅, 李斌, 李志刚. 磁性括约肌增强器治疗胃食管反流病术后不良反应与处理策略[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2022, 09(03): 173-180.

Yifeng Sun, Haoyao Jiang, Haiyong Gu, Yang Yang, Yi He, Bin Li, Zhigang Li. Management strategies of adverse reactions to magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Thoracic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 09(03): 173-180.

目的

拟探讨国产磁性括约肌增强器(MSA)治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)的不良反应与处理策略。

方法

按照上海市胸科医院-胜杰康公司磁性括约肌增强器(SS-MSA)临床试验的入排标准,2018年8月至2021年10月共纳入43例GERD患者接受MSA治疗,在腹腔镜下完成SS-MSA植入手术。术后主要疗效评价指标包括24 h酸暴露总时间、受试者服用PPI药物情况及GERD健康相关生活质量评分(GERD-Q)。记录并发症发生情况。本试验已在中国临床试验注册中心注册(注册号:ChiCTR-ONC-16009512)。

结果

43例接受MSA治疗患者中,23例完成1年的随访,24 h酸暴露总时间术前9%(6.2%~13.4%),术后0.4%(0.1%~2.4%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);术前GERD-HRQL评分为11(8~14),术后1年为6(6~11),较术前显著下降,差异有统计学意义(P=0.001)。受试者术前全部服用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)药物,术后持续性服用PPI药物患者为5例(21.7%,5/23)、入组患者可正常嗳气、打嗝。术后最常见的并发症为吞咽困难,发生率为86%(37/43),其中95%(35/37例)为轻中度,均在术后1~3个月缓解。2例患者术后1个月左右出现严重吞咽困难,术中分别植入13、14号MSA,均将装置取出。其余腹泻、腹痛、便秘、恶心等并发症,除1例腹泻患者住院治疗外,其余均对症治疗。术后仍有反酸症状持续者27例,短期缓解者13例,存在症状超过3个月的13例,以轻中度为主。1例因反流严重取出装置。1例因胸痛取出装置。

结论

SS-MSA手术后并发症主要为吞咽困难,短期内大多数均能缓解。选择好适当型号的MSA装置,良好的术前宣教、术后饮食指导将保证该术式的成功率。

Objective

Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a new surgical treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) . This study aimed to explore the postoperative complications and management strategies of Chinese MSA in the treatment of GERD.

Methods

According to the enrollment criteria for the SS-MSA clinical trial, 43 GERD patients were treated with MSA from August 2018 to October 2021. SS-MSA, jointly developed by ShengJieKang Co. and Shanghai Chest Hospital, was implanted via laparoscopy. The primary evaluation index of postoperative efficacy included the total time of acid exposure within 24 h, the average daily dose of PPI medications and GERD-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-Q) improvement after MSA implantation. The complications were recorded. This trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR-ONC-16009512) .

Results

Among the 43 GERD patients undergoing SS-MSA surgery, 23 cases were followed up for 1 year. The total time of acid exposure within 24 h [9% (6.2%–13.4%) vs 0.4% (0.1%–2.4%) , P<0.001] and GERD-Q score [11 (8–14) vs 6 (6–11) , P=0.001] were improved after operation significantly. All subjects took proton pump inhibitor (PPI) drugs before surgery, while 5 patients (21.7%) needed long-term administration of PPI postoperatively. The patients could belch normally. The most common complication after the operation was dysphagia (37/43, 86%) , of which 95% (35/37 cases) were mild to moderate and were relieved within 1–3 months. Two patients developed severe dysphagia one month after the operation with the size of MSA 13 and 14, both of which were removed. Other postoperative adverse events included diarrhea, abdominal pain, constipation, and nausea. All patients received symptomatic therapy and were relieved within 3 months, except for one case of diarrhea with readmission. Twenty-seven patients underwent persistent acid reflux symptoms postoperatively. The symptoms disappeared within 3 months in 13 patients and mild to moderate symptoms persisted in 14 patients, with intermittent or continuous use of PPI drugs and one patient had the device removed due to serious reflux. One patient had the device removed due to chest pain.

Conclusions

The main complication was dysphagia after SS-MSA implantation, which could be relieved in a short time. Proper selection of MSA devices, good preoperative education and postoperative diet guidance will ensure the success rate of the operation.

表1 患者术前、随访1年后24 h pH监测及食管功能指标比较
表2 上消化道内镜结果
图1 MSA示意图:内部磁体被外部钛合金密闭封装,并由钛丝连接;左侧为MSA安装后闭合状态,右侧为食物通过时MSA扩张状态
表3 术后不良事件发生例数分级与分期
表4 4例MSA装置取出临床数据
1
Dodds WJDent JHogan WJ,et al.Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with reflux esophagitis[J].N Engl J Med1982307(25):1547-1552.
2
DeMeester TRWernly JABryant GH,et al.Clinical and in vitro analysis of determinants of gastroesophageal competence. A study of the principles of antireflux surgery[J].Am J Surg1979137(1):39-46.
3
Pandolfino JEZhang QGGhosh SK,et al.Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and reflux: mechanistic analysis using concurrent fluoroscopy and high-resolution manometry[J].Gastroenterology2006131(6):1725-1733.
4
Eusebi LHRatnakumaran RYuan Y,et al.Global prevalence of, and risk factors for, gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms: a meta-analysis[J].Gut201867(3):430-440.
5
El-Serag HBecher AJones R.Systematic review: persistent reflux symptoms on proton pump inhibitor therapy in primary care and community studies[J].Aliment Pharmacol Ther201032(6):720-737.
6
Kahrilas PJJonsson ADenison H,et al.Regurgitation is less responsive to acid suppression than heartburn in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease[J].Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol201210(6):612-619.
7
Vakil NShaw MKirby R.Clinical effectiveness of laparoscopic fundoplication in a U.S. community[J].Am J Med2003114(1):1-5.
8
Patti MG.An Evidence-Based Approach to the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease[J].JAMA Surg2016151(1):73-78.
9
Richter JE.Gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment: side effects and complications of fundoplication[J].Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol201311(5):465-471.
10
Ganz RA.A Modern Magnetic Implant for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease[J].Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol201715(9):1326-1337.
11
Bonavina LSaino GIBona D,et al.Magnetic augmentation of the lower esophageal sphincter: results of a feasibility clinical trial[J].J Gastrointest Surg200812(12):2133-2140.
12
Ganz RAPeters JHHorgan S,et al.Esophageal sphincter device for gastroesophageal reflux disease[J].N Engl J Med2013368(8):719-727.
13
Saino GBonavina LLipham JC,et al.Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Gastroesophageal Reflux at 5 Years: Final Results of a Pilot Study Show Long-Term Acid Reduction and Symptom Improvement[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A201525(10):787-792.
14
Bonavina LSaino GBona D,et al.One hundred consecutive patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: 6 years of clinical experience from a single center[J].J Am Coll Surg2013217(4):577-585.
15
孙益峰,杨煜,张晓彬,等.磁力环治疗胃食管反流性疾病的实验研究[J].中华胸部外科电子杂志20185(1):42-46.
16
孙益峰,杨煜,顾海勇,等.磁力环治疗胃食管反流性疾病的临床技术应用[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志201935(12):755-758.
17
孙益峰,姜皓耀,顾海勇,等.磁性括约肌增强器治疗胃食管反流病19例初步临床结果分析[J].中华外科杂志202058(9):691-696.
18
Velanovich V.The development of the GERD-HRQL symptom severity instrument[J].Dis Esophagus200720(2):130-134.
19
Jones RJunghard ODent J,et al.Development of the GerdQ, a tool for the diagnosis and management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care[J].Aliment Pharmacol Ther200930(10):1030-1038.
20
Ayazi SZheng PZaidi AH,et al.Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation and Postoperative Dysphagia: Characterization, Clinical Risk Factors, and Management[J].J Gastrointest Surg202024(1):39-49.
21
Ganz RAPeters JHHorgan S.Esophageal sphincter device for gastroesophageal reflux disease[J].N Engl J Med2013368(21):2039-2040.
22
Warren HFBrown LMMihura M,et al.Factors influencing the outcome of magnetic sphincter augmentation for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease[J].Surg Endosc201832(1):405-412.
23
Ferrari DAsti ELazzari V,et al.Six to 12-year outcomes of magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease[J].Sci Rep202010(1):13753.
24
Sheu EGNau PNath B,et al.A comparative trial of laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation and Nissen fundoplication[J].Surg Endosc201529(3):505-509.
25
Lipham JCTaiganides PALouie BE,et al.Safety analysis of first 1000 patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease[J].Dis Esophagus201528(4):305-311.
26
Asti EAiolfi ALazzari V,et al.Magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: review of clinical studies[J].Updates Surg201870(3):323-330.
27
Fletcher RDunst CMAbdelmoaty WF,et al.Safety and efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation dilation[J].Surg Endosc202135(7):3861-3864.
28
Tatum JMAlicuben EBildzukewicz N,et al.Removing the magnetic sphincter augmentation device: operative management and outcomes[J].Surg Endosc201933(8):2663-2669.
29
Smith CDGanz RALipham JC,et al.Lower Esophageal Sphincter Augmentation for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: The Safety of a Modern Implant[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A201727(6):586-591.
30
Alicuben ETBell RCWJobe BA,et al.Worldwide Experience with Erosion of the Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device[J].J Gastrointest Surg201822(8):1442-1447.
31
DeMarchi JSchwiers MSoberman M,et al.Evolution of a novel technology for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a safety perspective of magnetic sphincter augmentation[J].Dis Esophagus202134::doab036.
32
Schwameis KNikolic MCastellano DGM,et al.Crural Closure improves Outcomes of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation in GERD patients with Hiatal Hernia[J].Sci Rep20188(1):7319.
33
Irribarra MMBlitz SWilshire CL,et al.[J].J Gastrointest Surg201923(6):1104-1112.
34
Bona DSaino GMini E,et al.Magnetic sphincter augmentation device removal: surgical technique and results at medium-term follow-up[J].Langenbecks Arch Surg2021406(7):2545-2551.
35
Alicuben ETTatum JMBildzukewicz N,et al.Regression of intestinal metaplasia following magnetic sphincter augmentation device placement[J].Surg Endosc201933(2):576-579.
[1] 李婷婷, 崔翔, 刘静, 吴鑫, 杨汐, 陈莉. 新型脐周按钮式切口在横向腹直肌肌瓣乳房重建中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 347-352.
[2] 李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[3] 刘林峰, 王增涛, 王云鹏, 钟硕, 郝丽文, 仇申强, 陈超. 足底内侧皮瓣联合甲骨皮瓣在手指V度缺损再造中的临床应用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 480-484.
[4] 张伟. 牙及牙槽外科:舒适治疗的先锋[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 386-388.
[5] 曹钰彬, 潘剑. 阻生牙拔除的为与不为[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 389-393.
[6] 岳志浩, 王晶, 闫子玉, 葛娜, 许向亮, 单小峰, 崔念晖. 牙槽外科相关舌神经损伤早期诊断及治疗中磁共振神经成像技术的应用[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 413-417.
[7] 易晨, 张亚东, 董茜, 唐海阔, 刘志国. 应用骨盖技术拔除下颌低位骨性埋伏阻生第三磨牙的疗效观察[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 424-429.
[8] 杜滨和, 徐楠, 杨云川, 崔培元. 5项改良衰弱指数预测胰十二指肠切除术近期预后的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 444-448.
[9] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[10] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[11] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[12] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[13] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[14] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
[15] 程相阵. 腹茧症9例诊治分析并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 968-971.
阅读次数
全文


摘要