切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胸部外科电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (03) : 181 -185. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8773.2022.03.09

论著

猪源纤维黏合剂对胸腔镜肺段切除术患者术后肺漏气的效果
陈郑玮1, 王高祥2, 吴汉然2, 孙效辉2, 李田2, 徐美青2, 解明然2,()   
  1. 1. 241001 芜湖,皖南医学院
    2. 230001 合肥,中国科学技术大学附属第一医院胸外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-10 修回日期:2022-05-30 接受日期:2022-08-09 出版日期:2022-08-28
  • 通信作者: 解明然
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81973643); 安徽省重点研发与开发计划项目(202004j070200017)

Effects of pulmonary air leakage in patients undergoing thoracoscopic segmentectomy with porcine adhesive

Zhengwei Chen1, Gaoxiang Wang2, Hanran Wu2, Xiaohui Sun2, Tian Li2, Meiqing Xu2, Mingran Xie2,()   

  1. 1. Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241001, China
    2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230001, China
  • Received:2022-04-10 Revised:2022-05-30 Accepted:2022-08-09 Published:2022-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Mingran Xie
引用本文:

陈郑玮, 王高祥, 吴汉然, 孙效辉, 李田, 徐美青, 解明然. 猪源纤维黏合剂对胸腔镜肺段切除术患者术后肺漏气的效果[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2022, 09(03): 181-185.

Zhengwei Chen, Gaoxiang Wang, Hanran Wu, Xiaohui Sun, Tian Li, Meiqing Xu, Mingran Xie. Effects of pulmonary air leakage in patients undergoing thoracoscopic segmentectomy with porcine adhesive[J]. Chinese Journal of Thoracic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 09(03): 181-185.

目的

探讨使用猪源纤维黏合剂能否改善胸腔镜肺段切除术患者术后肺漏气恢复时间。

方法

分析2021年1月至2021年11月于中国科学技术大学附属第一医院胸外科行胸腔镜肺段切除术的患者88例。根据术中膨肺观察后存在漏气肺组织并预防性使用猪源纤维黏合剂(广州倍绣生物技术有限公司,5 mL)设为观察组(A组);膨肺观察后存在漏气肺组织未预防性使用猪源纤维黏合剂设为对照组(B组);比较两组患者临床病理特征、围手术期资料和术后肺漏气情况。

结果

两组患者临床病理特征差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组术后住院天数显著少于对照组(P=0.044)、术后引流量更少(P=0.013)、术后带管时间更短(P=0.007)。观察组较对照组术后肺漏气发生率更低(P=0.046)及术后肺漏气恢复时间较快(P<0.001)。

结论

预防性使用猪源纤维黏合剂能够降低胸腔镜肺段切除术患者术后肺漏气发生率。

Objective

To investigate whether the use of porcine fiber adhesive can improve the recovery time and proportion of postoperative pulmonary air leakage in patients undergoing thoracoscopic segmentectomy.

Methods

Eighty-eight patients who underwent thoracoscopic segmentectomy in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China from January 2021 to November 2021 were observed and analyzed. They were divided into the observation group and the control group according to whether porcine fiber adhesive was used during the operation. The clinicopathological features, perioperative data and postoperative pulmonary air leakage were compared between the two groups.

Results

There was no statistical difference in clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups (P>0.05) . Compared with the control group, the observation group had shorter postoperative hospitalization days (P=0.044) , less postoperative drainage (P=0.013) , and shorter postoperative catheter time (P=0.07) . Compared with the control group, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary air leakage was less (P=0.046) and the recovery time of postoperative pulmonary air leakage was faster (P<0.001) .

Conclusions

Porcine fiber adhesive can reduce the incidence of pulmonary leakage after thoracoscopic segmentectomy.

表1 比较两组的临床资料
表2 两组患者肺段切除部位分布
表3 两组患者围手术期资料比较
1
Chan MVHuo YRCao C,et al.Survival outcomes for surgical resection versus CT-guided percutaneous ablation for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Eur Radiol202131(7):5421-5433.
2
Zeng WZhang WZhang J,et al.Systematic review and meta-analysis of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery segmentectomy versus lobectomy for stage I non–small cell lung cancer[J]. World J Surg Oncol202018(1):44.
3
Yoshimoto KNomori HMori T,et al.Comparison of postoperative pulmonary function and air leakage between pleural closure vs. mesh-cover for intersegmental plane in segmentectomy[J].J Cardiothorac Surg20116:61.
4
Saji HOkada MTsuboi M,et al.Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial[J].Lancet2022399(10335):1607-1617.
5
Deguchi HTomoyasu MShigeeda W,et al.Reduction of air leakage using linear staple device with bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid felt for pulmonary lobectomy[J]. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg202068(3):266-272.
6
Bironzo PDi Maio M.A review of guidelines for lung cancer[J]. J Thorac Dis201810(Suppl 13):S1556-S1563.
7
Yoshimoto KNomori HMori T,et al.Quantification of the impact of segmentectomy on pulmonary function by perfusion single-photon-emission computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography[J].J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2009137(5):1200-1205.
8
Matsumoto MShirahashi KYamamoto H,et al.Division of the intersegmental plane using electrocautery for segmentectomy in clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer[J].J Thorac Dis201810(Suppl 10):S1215-S1221.
9
中华医学会,中华医学会肿瘤学分会,中华医学会杂志社.中华医学会肺癌临床诊疗指南(2019版)[J].中华肿瘤杂志202042(4):257-287.
10
Suzuki KSaji HAokage K,et al.Comparison of pulmonary segmentectomy and lobectomy: Safety results of a randomized trial[J].J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2019158(3):895-907.
11
吴显宁,徐世斌,柯立,等.解剖性肺切除术后持续漏气预测模型构建[J].中国肺癌杂志201720(12):827-832.
12
Kawai NKawaguchi TSuzuki S,et al.Low-voltage coagulation, polyglycolic acid sheets, and fibrin glue to control air leaks in lung surgery[J].Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg201765(12):705-709.
13
Nomori HAbe MSugimura H,et al.Triple-layer sealing with absorptive mesh and fibrin glue is effective in preventing air leakage after segmentectomy: results from experiments and clinical study[J].Eur J Cardiothorac Surg201445(5):910-913.
14
张望,许洪磊,闻伟,等.肺段切除术中联合多种修补材料对于减少术后肺漏气的回顾性研究[J].中国肺癌杂志202023(10):852-857.
15
欧思琳.猪源纤维蛋白粘合剂对创口粘合作用及其机制研究[D].广州:广东药科大学,2019
16
Kuckelman JConner JZheng Y,et al.Improved outcomes utilizing a novel pectin-based pleural sealant following acute lung injury[J].J Trauma Acute Care Surg202089(5):915-919.
[1] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[2] 易晨, 张亚东, 董茜, 唐海阔, 刘志国. 应用骨盖技术拔除下颌低位骨性埋伏阻生第三磨牙的疗效观察[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 424-429.
[3] 杜滨和, 徐楠, 杨云川, 崔培元. 5项改良衰弱指数预测胰十二指肠切除术近期预后的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 444-448.
[4] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[5] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[6] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[7] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[8] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[9] 曹智, 朱希望, 王尉, 张辉, 杨成林, 张小明. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术中不同肾盂内压力与围术期并发症相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 616-620.
[10] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[11] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[12] 戴玮, 江桂林, 车兆平, 张姣, 王星星, 赵海涛. 无缝手术护理在腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 778-781.
[13] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[14] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[15] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
阅读次数
全文


摘要