切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胸部外科电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 204 -208. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8773.2026.03.05

综述

中国微创食管癌切除术三十年回顾与展望
孙赐恩1, 沈建飞1, 李志刚2, 朱成楚1,†()   
  1. 1317000 临海,温州医科大学附属台州医院胸外科
    2200030 上海,上海交通大学医学院附属胸科医院胸外科
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-28 修回日期:2026-03-04 接受日期:2026-05-11 出版日期:2026-08-28
  • 通信作者: 朱成楚
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省卫生健康行业科技计划-委省共建重点项目(WKJ-ZJ-26101); 台州恩泽医疗中心(集团)科研基金(2025EZLY02); 台州恩泽医疗中心(集团)科研基金(2024EZLY04)

Thirty years of minimally invasive esophagectomy in China: review and prospect

Ci’en Sun1, Jianfei Shen1, Zhigang Li2, Chengchu Zhu1,†()   

  1. 1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai 317000, China
    2Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200030, China
  • Received:2026-01-28 Revised:2026-03-04 Accepted:2026-05-11 Published:2026-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Chengchu Zhu
引用本文:

孙赐恩, 沈建飞, 李志刚, 朱成楚. 中国微创食管癌切除术三十年回顾与展望[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2026, 13(03): 204-208.

Ci’en Sun, Jianfei Shen, Zhigang Li, Chengchu Zhu. Thirty years of minimally invasive esophagectomy in China: review and prospect[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Thoracic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 13(03): 204-208.

本文系统梳理并总结中国胸腔镜微创食管切除术(MIE)三十余年的发展历程与未来趋势。回顾自20世纪90年代初至今,中国食管癌微创治疗从起步探索到全面普及的演进路径,分析器械革新、术式演变、关键技术突破及综合治疗模式转变。20世纪90年代初,面对传统开胸手术创伤巨大、并发症频发的临床痛点,中国胸外科先驱在器械匮乏、技术空白及理念保守的"三重壁垒"中开启了微创探索。历经三十年砥砺前行,该领域实现了历史性跨越:微创器械完成了从"简易自制"到"高端国产化、智能化"的迭代;手术术式从早期的胸腔镜辅助发展为全胸腔镜、机器人辅助及单孔胸腔镜、纵隔镜等多元化体系;侧俯卧位、管状胃制作、各类创新吻合及淋巴结清扫等关键技术日臻成熟。治疗理念已从单纯追求"切口微创"升华为"围术期多学科全程管理"。此外,基于中国数据的多项高水平临床研究(如NEOCRTEC5010、ESCORT-NEO等)改写了国际指南,标志着中国在食管癌诊疗领域从"跟跑"转向"领跑"。总体而言,中国MIE已建立起规范、成熟的技术体系。未来将向更精准的影像规划、更智能的机器人平台、更极致的器官功能保留及更规范的同质化诊疗方向持续迈进,以"中国智慧"造福广大食管癌患者。

This paper systematically reviews the evolution and future prospects of thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in China over the past three decades. The developmental trajectory of MIE in China from the early 1990s to the present was analyzed, focusing on instrument innovation, surgical approach evolution, breakthroughs in key techniques, and the shift in comprehensive treatment paradigms. In the early 1990s, in response to the significant trauma and high morbidity associated with traditional open transthoracic esophagectomy, Chinese thoracic surgeons initiated minimally invasive exploration despite challenges such as reliance on imported instruments, lack of technical precedents, and conservative mindsets. Over the past thirty years, the field has achieved a comprehensive leap: surgical instruments have evolved from "homemade adaptations" to sophisticated domestic manufacturing and intelligent systems; surgical approaches have diversified from video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery to totally thoracoscopic, robot-assisted, uniportal, and mediastinoscopic techniques. Critical breakthroughs have been made in the semi-prone position approach, tubular gastric conduit reconstruction, and the innovative anastomosis techniques. The treatment paradigm has shifted from surgery alone to perioperative multidisciplinary comprehensive therapy. Notably, several high-impact clinical trials led by Chinese researchers have been incorporated into international guidelines, signifying a shift from "following" to "leading" in the global arena. Overall, a standardized and mature technical system for MIE has been established in China. Future developments will focus on greater precision through imaging planning, intelligent robotic platforms, organ preservation strategies, and the standardization of care across regions, aiming to optimize outcomes for esophageal cancer patients with "Chinese solutions" .

图1 从开放到微创:食管癌手术术式演变图
1
Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74(3): 229-263.
2
Morgan E, Soerjomataram I, Rumgay H, et al. The Global Landscape of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Incidence and Mortality in 2020 and Projections to 2040: New Estimates From GLOBOCAN 2020[J]. Gastroenterology, 2022, 163(3): 649-658.e2.
3
Gilbert A, Xie R, Bonnell LN, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: Comparing the combined effects of smoking burden and operative approach on outcomes in esophagectomy[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2025, 169(3): 777-786.e9.
4
Terayama M, Okamura A, Kuriyama K, et al. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Provides Better Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Than Open Esophagectomy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2024, 31(9): 5748-5756.
5
廖仲恺, 罗德凡, 彭东阁, 等. 国产手术机器人辅助下McKeown食管癌切除术:海南省首例报道(附手术视频)[J]. 机器人外科学杂志(中英文), 2024, 5(4): 751-756.
6
Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S. Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach[J]. J R Coll Surg Edinb, 1992, 37(1): 7-11.
7
朱成楚, 叶加洪, 叶中瑞, 等. 电视胸腔镜辅助食管癌切除及并发症预防[J]. 中华胸心血管外科杂志, 1999, 15(2): 102-103.
8
谭黎杰, 王群, 冯明祥, 等. 一种新的食管切除法——俯卧位胸腔镜食管切除术(附8例报告)[J]. 中国临床医学, 2009, 16(5): 720-721.
9
陈克能, 师晓天. 食管切除胃代食管后胸胃功能的研究现状[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 1997(3): 187-189.
10
王文光, 李冰, 李印, 等. 食管癌切除食管胃颈部吻合术后颈部瘘16例分析[J].河南肿瘤学杂志, 1996(4): 262-264.
11
中国抗癌协会食管癌专业委员会. 食管癌根治术胸部淋巴结清扫中国专家共识(2017版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2017, 16(11): 1087-1090.
12
Zheng K, He W, Wang H, et al. Metastasis to recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes as a predictor of cervical lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Asian J Surg, 2023, 46(4): 1664-1666.
13
Yang H, Liu H, Chen Y, et al. Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Surgery Alone for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus (NEOCRTEC5010): A Phase III Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2018, 36(27): 2796-2803.
14
Yang H, Liu H, Chen Y, et al. Long-term Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The NEOCRTEC5010 Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2021, 156(8): 721-729.
15
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers (Version 2.2019). Accessed 29 May, 2019.
16
中国临床肿瘤学会指南工作委员会. 食管癌诊疗指南(2020版)[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2020.
17
Qin J, Xue L, Hao A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without camrelizumab in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the randomized phase 3 ESCORT-NEO/NCCES01 trial[J]. Nat Med, 2024, 30(9): 2549-2557.
18
Liu J, Yang Y, Liu Z, et al. Multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial of camrelizumab and chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. J Immunother Cancer, 2022, 10(3): e004291.
19
Yang Y, Liu J, Liu Z, et al. Two-year outcomes of clinical N2-3 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy from the phase 2 NICE study[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2024, 167(3): 838-847.e1.
20
Li C, Han Y, Zhao S, et al. Preoperative pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1 antibody) combined with chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase 1/2 trial (PALACE-2)[J]. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2025, 10(1): 386.
21
Yang Y, Liu Z, Wong I, et al. Detecting residual disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: The prospective multicentre preSINO trial[J]. Br J Surg, 2025, 112(2): znaf004.
22
李印. "免管免禁"食管癌外科模式的历史、现状与未来[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2020, 7(3): 135-139.
[1] 乔山青, 张凤凯, 方剑, 张宏江, 薛瑞. 艾司氯胺酮联合胸腔镜引导胸椎旁阻滞对肺癌肺叶切除术后恢复与镇痛药物用量的影响[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(04): 663-669.
[2] 张沂虎, 但素平, 张兴聪, 王聪懿, 陈栋. 超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞复合全麻对胸腔镜肺结节切除术后镇痛效果及康复的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(04): 670-675.
[3] 张静文, 马静, 杨轲, 贺晶, 王萍. 全程系统化肺康复管理在肺癌合并COPD患者单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(04): 680-683.
[4] 孟璐, 张欢欢, 孔婧, 疏玲玲, 吴晓叶, 胡友洋. 环泊酚与丙泊酚用于胸腔镜肺癌肺叶切除术麻醉诱导的血流动力学及术后恢复比较[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 424-430.
[5] 张慧玲, 戚娟, 于璐, 王珊, 张爱荣. 艾司氯胺酮对胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者肺缺血再灌注损伤氧合功能及肺内分流率的影响[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 484-487.
[6] 张前兴, 艾尔西丁, 陈亮, 邓旭锋, 刘权兴, 戴纪刚, 刘小兵. 儿童肺舌段包虫囊肿行胸腔镜左肺上叶舌段切除术一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 516-518.
[7] 胡佳, 任甜甜, 吴刘萍, 秦雯, 罗均, 蔡淑昕, 朱琴. 87例非小细胞肺癌患者胸腔镜术后疼痛影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(01): 112-116.
[8] 白雪峰, 熊家强, 宋锐南, 陈雨柔, 吕琼莹, 张蔚. 机器人宫颈癌根治手术的并发症防治[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 132-134.
[9] 热孜婉古丽·吾布力, 韩莉莉, 蔡丽萍. 5G远程机器人辅助腹腔镜治疗子宫内膜癌的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 176-179.
[10] 曹佩佩, 叶峰, 丁静. 食管肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术后电凝综合征列线图预测模型的构建[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(05): 415-421.
[11] 吴清海, 喻晓敏, 王珊, 李玉珍, 孔俊丽. 甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑与环泊酚用于胸腔镜食管癌切除术的倾向性评分匹配研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(04): 367-373.
[12] 席雅楠, 姚国栋, 郭秀珍, 高斌礼, 赵渊, 李婷, 钟李岩, 李梦倩. IDEAS模式对机器人辅助结直肠癌根治术患者康复结局的影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 285-291.
[13] 毛丽娟, 黄奕婷, 丁永刚, 张婷, 金甜, 李文杰, 卢晓云, 王耀辉, 张其德. 基于新分型探讨伴有瘢痕的早期食管肿瘤再次内镜黏膜下剥离术的安全性及难度预测[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2026, 13(02): 93-100.
[14] 黄佳, 潘汉博, 田禹, 沈凡, 林凯临, 李剑涛, 林皓, 陈天翔, 成兴华, 罗清泉. 机器人辅助胸腔镜手术治疗非小细胞肺癌的围手术期和长期生存结局:基于上海市胸科医院13年临床实践的真实世界研究[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2026, 13(03): 181-188.
[15] 熊燃, 陈瑶, 许涛, 李彩伟, 李娟. 肺切除术中右上肺静脉异位引流1例[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2026, 13(02): 147-151.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?