切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胸部外科电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (02) : 113 -117. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095.8773.2018.02.09

所属专题: 文献

论著

胸腔镜下肺段切除术后护理特殊性分析及护理方案改进
刘敏1, 袁源1, 郭明1,()   
  1. 1. 361003 厦门大学附属成功医院 解放军第一七四医院胸外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-12 出版日期:2018-05-28
  • 通信作者: 郭明
  • 基金资助:
    南京军区医学科技创新课题(15DXO15)

The particularity analysis of postoperative nursing after thoracoscopic pulmonary segment resection and nursing-improvement scheme

Min Liu1, Yuan Yuan1, Ming Guo1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Success Hospital Affiliated Xiamen University, Xiamen 361000, China
  • Received:2017-10-12 Published:2018-05-28
  • Corresponding author: Ming Guo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Guo Ming, E-mail:
引用本文:

刘敏, 袁源, 郭明. 胸腔镜下肺段切除术后护理特殊性分析及护理方案改进[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2018, 05(02): 113-117.

Min Liu, Yuan Yuan, Ming Guo. The particularity analysis of postoperative nursing after thoracoscopic pulmonary segment resection and nursing-improvement scheme[J]. Chinese Journal of Thoracic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 05(02): 113-117.

目的

分析胸腔镜下肺段切除术后护理的特殊性并改进护理方案。

方法

选择2015年9月1日—2016年8月31日,在厦门大学附属成功医院胸外科行胸腔镜下单操作孔单肺叶切除或单肺段切除术的60例患者,将肺叶切除术后的护理方案定义为常规护理,将肺段切除术后改进的护理方案定义为特殊护理,根据手术方法和护理方案将患者分为三组。①肺叶切除常规护理组(n=18);②肺段切除常规护理组(n=21);③肺段切除特殊护理组(n=21)。特殊护理措施是指在常规护理方案的基础上,强化术后呼吸道护理、延长拔胸管时间、术后不适指数评估与充分止痛。比较三组患者术后胸腔引流量、并发症发生率、不适指数、住院天数等指标的差异。

结果

三组患者的平均年龄、性别构成、手术时间、术中出血量、术后胸腔引流量比较,差异均无明显统计学差异(P>0.05)。肺段切除常规护理组术后第1、5天的不适指数显著高于肺叶切除常规护理组和肺段切除特殊护理组,差异均有统计学意义(P≤0.01);但三组间术后第3天的不适指数比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。肺段切除常规护理组的术后住院时间显著高于肺叶切除常规护理组和肺段切除特殊护理组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

因手术术式的不同,胸腔镜下肺段切除术后护理与肺叶切除术相比有其特殊性,通过改进的护理方案,可减少术后并发症、减轻术后不适和缩短住院时间。

Objective

To analyze the particularity of the nursing care after thoracoscopic pulmonary segment resection, propose the improved nursing scheme and demonstrate its effect.

Methods

60 patients who underwent single-utility-port single-lobectomy or single-segmentectomy of thoracoscopic surgery from September 1, 2015 to August 31, 2016 at the Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University were divided into 3 groups according to surgery method and nursing scheme. The nursing scheme for lobectomy and segmentectomy were defined as common nursing and special nursing, respectively. Group 1 included 18 patients who underwent lobectomy surgery and received common nursing; group 2 included 21 patients who underwent segmentectomy surgery and received common nursing; group 3 included 21 patients who underwent segmentectomy surgery and received special nursing. The special nursing measures refer to enhanced postoperative respiratory care, prolonged chest-tube removal time, postoperative discomfort index assessment and adequate pain relief. The differences in postoperative chest drainage volume, complication rate, discomfort index, and days of hospital stay were compared among the three groups.

Results

There was no significant difference in the average age, gender composition, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative chest drainage volume among the three groups (P>0.05). The discomfort index on the 1st and 5th day after operation in the group 2 was significantly higher than that in the other groups. However there was no significant difference of the discomfort index on the 3rd day among the 3 groups. But postoperative hospital stay time of group 2 was longer than that of the other groups.

Conclusions

Due to different surgical operations, there are some special features in the postoperative nursing between segmentectomy and lobectomy. The improved nursing scheme can reduce postoperative complications, reduce postoperative discomfort and shorten hospital stay.

表1 患者术后不适指数评分标准
表2 三组患者基本资料比较
表3 三组患者术后相关指标比较
1
Schuchert MJ, Pettiford BL, Keeley S. Anatomic segmentectomy in the treatment of stage Ⅰ non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2007, 84(3): 926-932.
2
李仲廉, 安建雄, 倪家骧,等. 临床疼痛治疗学[M]. 3版.天津:天津科学技术出版社,2003:332-390.
3
Landreneau RJ, Normolle DP, Christie NA, et al. Recurrence and survival outcomes after anatomic esgmentomy versus lobectomy for clinical stage Ⅰ non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2014, 32(23): 2449-2455.
4
赵纯,曹隆想,张翀. 胸腔镜下肺段切除术与肺叶切除术治疗肺癌的近期疗效评估[J]. 华中科技大学学报:医学版,2015, 44(2):213-216.
5
Klepetko W, Taghavi S, Pereszlenyi A, et al. Impact of different coverages techniques on incidence of postpneumonectomy stump fistula[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 1999,15(6):758-763.
6
Sonobe M, Nakagawa M, Ichinose M, et al. Analysis of risk factors in bronchopleural fistula after pulmonary resection for primary lung cancer[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2000,18(5):519-523.
7
张真榕,刘德若,郭永庆,等. 肺段切除与肺叶切除治疗早期非小细胞肺癌的病例对照研究[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2015, 22(8): 754-759.
8
刘瀚,陈亮,朱全,等. 完全胸腔镜下解剖性肺段切除术与肺叶切除术治疗肺部小结节的近期疗效比较[J]. 中华临床医师杂志:电子版,2012, 6(13):103-105.
9
蒲强,梅建东,廖虎,等. 全胸腔镜解剖性肺段切除治疗肺部疾病的早期结果[J]. 中华外科杂志,2012, 50(9):823-826.
10
钟斌,吴奇勇,童继春,等. 胸腔镜肺段或肺叶切除术治疗肺磨玻璃结节的比较研究[J]. 中国微创外科杂志,2017, 17(1):62-64.
11
刘洋,钟声逸,何绮华,等. Ⅰ期肺腺癌VATS肺叶切除与亚肺叶切除预后比较[J]. 中国肺癌杂志,2017(1):47-54.
12
谢首智,陈名久. 气胸及肺术后漏气的治疗选择与进展[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2015(6):602-606.
13
李华胜,梅建东,赵珂嘉,等. 肺手术后持续性漏气的现状及相关进展[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2016(8):832-836.
[1] 刘思源, 唐晓宁, 陈攀宇, 蒋欣余, 刘玲. 全髋关节置换患者延迟出院相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 521-527.
[2] 徐兴全, 闫文强, 姚尧, 严文津, 郭虎, 陈东阳, 徐志宏, 蒋青, 史冬泉. 低蛋白血症延长髋膝关节置换患者住院日[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 39-44.
[3] 朱天琦, 孙晓毅, 魏明发, 蒙信尧, 冯杰雄. 先天性巨结肠患儿术后住院时间影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(01): 106-113.
[4] 游小林, 干晓琴, 黄利琼, 张家佳, 张强, 黄璐, 袁薇, 李娟. 子宫肌瘤原位旋切法在腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术的应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(05): 566-570.
[5] 尚文雯, 赵鸿, 戎国栋, 吴蕾, 黄珮珺, 王芳, 徐婷. 肺炎伴巨细胞病毒感染患儿外周血免疫功能分析[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(02): 105-109.
[6] 马金栋, 王蕾, 蔡婷婷, 焦向飞, 陈强谱. 腹部外科住院患者肌肉减少症状况及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 69-74.
[7] 周海霞, 聂婷, 蒋媛, 唐青. 综合护理干预对前列腺增生症合并腹股沟疝术后自我护理及生活质量的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 227-231.
[8] 赵相坤, 魏岚, 陈卉, 刘冬冬. 胸腔镜下肺叶切除术和开胸肺叶切除术的效果和成效分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(02): 169-173.
[9] 蒋闯, 廖明恒, 曾勇. 糖尿病对肝切除术患者围手术期情况的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(01): 82-86.
[10] 耿倩, 鹿青, 李莎, 臧雅静, 顾聚源. 循环渐进式康复策略促进前交叉韧带重建术后患者下肢功能恢复的临床研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 101-107.
[11] 迟迅, 赵德伟, 崔大平, 郭林, 田丰德, 安宁. 全膝关节置换术围手术期规范化疼痛护理管理[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2019, 05(04): 223-227.
[12] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
[13] 陈瑛, 张迪, 王晓颖, 彭晓艳, 韩同英, 陈亮, 贾盛华, 李莉. 血小板参数与极低出生体重儿严重并发症和住院时长的相关性[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 87-94.
[14] 吕宝华, 米芳, 吕雪珍, 邱美蓉, 刘敏, 郑巧芬, 卓龙彩. 胸外专科重症监护室过渡性护理对减少食管癌术后肺部感染的作用[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2022, 09(01): 23-28.
[15] 尹江涛, 王宇超, 潘鑫, 缪志龙, 梅琼, 黄自强, 刘大东. COVID-19感染患者低钾血症与临床预后的相关性研究[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 70-79.
阅读次数
全文


摘要