切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胸部外科电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (03) : 147 -152. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8773.2018.03.02

所属专题: 文献

论著

食管癌切除附加抗反流术后残余食管黏膜上环氧化酶-2的表达
王金栋1,(), 朱守营1, 王峦1, 田春艳1, 陆源建1   
  1. 1. 221002 徐州医科大学附属徐州市立医院胸外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-16 出版日期:2018-08-28
  • 通信作者: 王金栋
  • 基金资助:
    徐州市科技计划项目(KC14SH003)

Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in the remnant esophageal mucosa after esophagectomy with anti-reflux anastomosis

Jindong Wang1,(), Shouying Zhu1, Luan Wang1, Chunyan Tian1, Yuanjian Lu1   

  1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, XuZhou Municipal Hospital Affiliated To XuZhou Medical University, XuZhou 221002, China
  • Received:2018-04-16 Published:2018-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Jindong Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Jindong, Email:
引用本文:

王金栋, 朱守营, 王峦, 田春艳, 陆源建. 食管癌切除附加抗反流术后残余食管黏膜上环氧化酶-2的表达[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2018, 05(03): 147-152.

Jindong Wang, Shouying Zhu, Luan Wang, Chunyan Tian, Yuanjian Lu. Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in the remnant esophageal mucosa after esophagectomy with anti-reflux anastomosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Thoracic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 05(03): 147-152.

目的

探讨食管癌切除附加改良Nissen折叠术后残余食管黏膜上环氧化酶-2(COX-2)表达的意义。

方法

对2013年12月—2015年7月徐州医科大学附属徐州市立医院胸外科收治的50例食管中下段癌患者按照随机对照试验原则分为抗反流吻合组和常规吻合组。常规吻合组实施食管癌切除食管胃常规吻合术,抗反流吻合组在实施常规吻合基础上附加改良Nissen折叠术,术后42例患者参加随访,并以10名无反流症状的健康志愿者为对照组。行胃镜检查观察残余食管黏膜形态学改变和黏膜活检,采用real-time PCR检测残余食管黏膜上COX-2基因的表达。

结果

抗反流吻合组反流性食管炎的发生率为45%,常规吻合组为68.2%,两组间反流性食管炎的发生率无明显差别(P=1.313),而抗反流组反流性食管炎评分明显低于常规吻合组(P=0.038)。正常对照组食管黏膜上COX-2呈现低水平表达,两组在胃镜下检查残余食管黏膜是否发生反流性食管炎的COX-2相对表达量均高于正常对照组(P=0.031,P=0.016),而两组间无明显差别(P=0.137)。常规吻合组和抗反流吻合组残余食管黏膜上COX-2的相对表达量均高于对照组(P=0.002,P=0.047),而抗反流吻合组残余食管黏膜上COX-2表达明显低于常规吻合组(P=0.036)。

结论

食管癌切除附加改良Nissen折叠术具有抗反流的效果,检测残余食管黏膜上COX-2的表达变化是反应食管癌术后胃食管反流的灵敏指标,也可能是一种评估抗反流吻合效果的新方法。

Objective

To investigate the significance of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression in the remnant esophageal mucosa after esophagectomy with modified Nissen folding anastomosis.

Methods

From December 2013 to July 2015, 50 patients with lower esophageal cancer who underwent thoracic surgery were divided into anti-reflux anastomosis group and conventional anastomosis group according to the principle of randomized controlled trial. The conventional anastomosis group was performed with esophageal cancer resection and esophagogastric anastomosis. The anti-reflux anastomosis group was modified with Nissen folding on the basis of anastomosis anastomosis. 42 patients were followed up, and 10 healthy volunteers without reflux symptoms were enrolled as the control group. Morphological changes and mucosal biopsy of residual esophageal mucosa were observed by gastroscopy. The expression of COX-2 gene in residual esophageal mucosa was detected by real-time PCR.

Results

The incidence of reflux esophagitis in the anti-reflux anastomosis group was 45%, and that in the conventional anastomosis group was 68.2%. There was no significant difference in the incidence of reflux esophagitis between the two groups (P=1.313), while the score of reflux esophagitis in the anti-reflux group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (P=0.038). The COX-2 expression of the esophageal mucosa in the control group was low, and the expression in the other two groups was higher than that in the control group (P=0.031, P=0.016). But there were no significant differences between these two groups (P=0.137). The COX-2 expression on the residual esophageal mucosa in the conventional anastomosis group and the anti-reflux anastomosis group was higher than that in the control group (P=0.002, P=0.047), while the expression in the anti-reflux anastomosis group was significantly lower than that in the conventional anastomosis group (P=0.036).

Conclusions

Esophageal cancer resection with modified Nissen folding has anti-reflux effect. Detection of COX-2 expression in residual esophageal mucosa is a sensitive indicator for postoperative gastroesophageal reflux in esophageal cancer, which is also a new method for evaluating the effect of anti-reflux anastomosis.

图1 食管癌切除常规吻合和附加改良Nissen折叠术示意图。A:常规吻合;B~E:抗反流吻合
表1 COX-2、β-actin引物和TaqMan探针
表2 常规吻合组和抗反流吻合组基线资料比较[n(%)]
图2 常规吻合组和抗反流吻合组反流性食管炎发生率
表3 残余食管黏膜上发生反流食管炎和黏膜正常组与正常对照组COX-2 mRNA表达量比较(±s)
表4 常规吻合组、抗反流吻合组和正常对照组COX-2 mRNA表达量比较(±s)
[1]
Dresner SM, Wayman J, Bennet MK, et al. A human model of duodeno-gastro-oesophageal reflux in the development of Barrett’s metaplasia[J]. BJS,2003, 90(9): 1120-1128.
[2]
王其彰,刘俊峰,赵新明,等. 食管胃吻合口能否抗胃食管反流?[J]中华外科杂志,1999, 37(2): 71-73.
[3]
da Rocha JR, Ribeiro U Jr, Sallum RA, et al. Barrett’s esophagus and carcinoma in the esophageal stump (ES) after esophagectomy with gastric pull-up in achalasia patients: a study based on 10 years follow-up[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2008, 15(10): 2903-2909.
[4]
刘俊峰,王金栋,刘新波 ,等. 食管癌切除食管胃抗反流吻合手术效果分析[J]. 中华外科杂志,2011, 49(1): 61-65.
[5]
Hamoui N, Peters JH, Schneider S, et al. Increased acid exposure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease influences cyclooxygenase-2 gene expression in the squamous epithelium of the lower esophagus[J]. Arch Surg, 2004, 139(7): 712-716.
[6]
Vallböhmer D, DeMeester SR, Oh DS, et al. Antireflux surgery normalizes cyclooxygenase-2 expression in squamous epithelium of the distal esophagus[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2006, 101(7): 1458-1466.
[7]
Oh DS, DeMeester SR, Vallbohmer D, et al. Reduction of interleukin 8 gene expression in reflux esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus with antireflux surgery[J]. Arch Surg, 2007, 142(6): 554-559.
[8]
Wei Li, Shu-tian Zhang-Lin Yu. Clinical and esdoscopic features of chinese reflux esophagitis patients[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2008, 14(12): 1866-1871.
[9]
王其彰,李保庆,王福顺,等. 食管癌切除术后反流性食管炎[J]. 肿瘤防治研究,1989, 16(2): 73-75.
[10]
王金栋,刘俊峰,王其彰,等. 食管癌贲门癌术后酸反流与十二指肠胃食管反流[J]. 中华胸心血管外科杂志,2009, 25(6): 397-399.
[11]
Arul P, Phansalkar M, Alexander T, et al. Endoscope versus microscope in the diagnosis of esophageal non-erosive reflux disease: a study of 71 cases[J]. Malays J Pathol, 2014, 36(3): 181-188.
[12]
Jung SH, Oh JH, Kang SG. Clinical characteristics and natural history of asymptomatic erosive esophagitis[J]. Turk J Gastroenterol, 2014, 25(3): 248-252.
[13]
Hamaguchi M, Fujiwara Y, Takashima T, et al. Increased expression of cytokines and adhesion molecules in rat chronic esophagitis[J]. Digestion, 2003, 68(4): 189-197.
[14]
Yoshida N, Uchiyama K, Kuroda M, et al. Interleukin-8 expression in the esophageal mucosa of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2004, 39(9): 816-822.
[15]
Li B, Yang Y, Sun Y, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma-Shanghai Chest Hospital experience[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2018 , 10(6): 3800-3807.
[16]
吴良洪,宋宇,石珂,等. Iovr-Lewis管状胃纵隔化食管癌根治术[J].中华消化外科杂志,2015, 14(12): 1042-1046.
[17]
Shu YS, Sun C, Shi WP, et al. Tubular stomach or whole stomach for esophagectomy through cervico-thoraco-abdominal approach: a comparative clinical study on anastomotic leakage[J]. Ir J Med Sci, 2013, 182(3): 477-480.
[18]
Bemelman WA, Taat CW, Slors JF, et al. Delayed postoperative emptying after esophageal resection is dependent on the size of the gastric substitute[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 1995, 180(4) :461-464.
[19]
Usui H, Fukaya M, Itatsu K, et al. The Impact of the Location of Esophagogastrostomy on Acid and DuodenogastroesophagealReflux After Transthoracic Esophagectomy with Gastric Tube Reconstruction and Intrathoracic Esophagogastrostomy[J]. World J Surg, 2018, 42(2): 599-605.
[1] 李世红, 侯康. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝补片修补术联合胃底折叠术(Nissen)[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 365-365.
[2] 王鸿彬, 何晓, 吴菁宙. 腹腔镜近端胃切除术中背驮式间置空肠单通道重建术在AEG手术的安全性及抗反流效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 526-529.
[3] 赵国栋, 施喆, 孙树刚, 薛亮, 王晓辉, 杨勇. 两种消化道重建方案的腹腔镜近端胃切除术后患者胃内压变化的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 292-295.
[4] 贾卓奇, 周维茹, 张勇, 张广健, 付军科. 达·芬奇机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的对比研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 410-414.
[5] 高加林, 曹亚娟. 腹腔镜解剖性肝右后叶切除治疗食管癌根治术后孤立性肝转移[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 239-242.
[6] 施我大, 张亚军, 施展, 吴纪祥, 常绘文, 易忠权, 梁晓东, 周晶晶, 宋建祥. Treg细胞通过上调TGF-β1和B7-H3表达促进食管癌细胞增殖、迁移和侵袭[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 65-75.
[7] 侯超, 潘美辰, 吴文明, 黄兴广, 李翔, 程凌雪, 朱玉轩, 李文波. 早期食管癌及上皮内瘤变内镜黏膜下剥离术后食管狭窄的危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 383-387.
[8] 单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
[9] 苏鹏, 吕会来, 温士旺, 黄超, 张缜, 田子强. 全腔镜下食管癌根治术围手术期呼吸系统并发症发生的危险因素分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 294-298.
[10] 曹旬旬, 费素娟. 食管癌患者肿瘤组织CXCL5和CXCR2的表达与病情和预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 299-304.
[11] 陈柯豫, 黄艳齐, 张玲利. 同时性多发早期食管癌及高级别上皮内瘤变的危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 524-528.
[12] 秦建军, 郭旭峰, 胡杨, 李向楠, 李卓毅, 林江波, 梅新宇, 唐鹏, 王长春, 王枫, 王洪琰, 尹俊, 袁勇, 赵晋波, 李志刚, 李印. 日本2022版食管癌诊治指南在中国的接受度——中国红杉树专家调研[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 195-199.
[13] 李正龙, 赵永生, 罗钶鑫, 彭忠勤. 胸腔镜切除治疗全内脏反位合并食管癌手术1例并文献复习[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 234-237.
[14] 孙天宇, 王如文, 蒋彬. 食管碰撞癌1例[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 238-240.
[15] 闫文貌, 孙海涛, 白日星. 胃袖状切除相关术式中应重视胃窦部解剖与生理功能[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 161-164.
阅读次数
全文


摘要