切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胸部外科电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (04) : 208 -212. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8773.2018.04.02

所属专题: 文献

论著

食管癌三切口术后吻合口良性狭窄的危险因素分析
苏瑜琛1, 张建卫1, 蒋勇1, 杨煜1, 孙益峰1, 郭旭峰1, 李志刚1,()   
  1. 1. 200030 上海交通大学附属胸科医院胸外科,食管外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-25 出版日期:2018-11-28
  • 通信作者: 李志刚

An analysis of risk factors for benign anastomotic stenosis after McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

Yuchen Su1, Jianwei Zhang1, Yong Jiang1, Yu Yang1, Yifeng Sun1, Xufeng Guo1, Zhigang Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery &Esophageal Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, China
  • Received:2018-09-25 Published:2018-11-28
  • Corresponding author: Zhigang Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Zhigang, Email:
引用本文:

苏瑜琛, 张建卫, 蒋勇, 杨煜, 孙益峰, 郭旭峰, 李志刚. 食管癌三切口术后吻合口良性狭窄的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2018, 05(04): 208-212.

Yuchen Su, Jianwei Zhang, Yong Jiang, Yu Yang, Yifeng Sun, Xufeng Guo, Zhigang Li. An analysis of risk factors for benign anastomotic stenosis after McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Thoracic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 05(04): 208-212.

目的

探讨食管癌患者行三切口食管切除术(McKeown术)颈部吻合后发生吻合口良性狭窄的危险因素。

方法

回顾性分析2016年9月至2017年8月在上海市胸科医院单一治疗组中行McKeown术,以管状胃代食管的所有食管癌患者,以术后出现良性吻合口狭窄并进行连续扩张次数≥3次的患者为狭窄组,无术后狭窄或狭窄较轻扩张次数<3次的患者为非狭窄组,对两组患者的一般情况、ASA评分、手术方式、吻合方式、管胃上提部位、肿瘤R0切除情况、吻合口瘘等进行统计分析,分析吻合口狭窄的危险因素。

结果

共入选271例患者,有9.6%的患者需要行3次或3次以上的扩张治疗。单因素分析显示,高龄(>70岁)、术前新辅助治疗、手工吻合、胸骨后管胃上提路径、吻合口瘘、肿瘤的非R0切除与严重的吻合口狭窄均有相关性(P<0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,吻合口瘘(OR=5.541,95% CI:2.110~14.549,P=0.001)和胸骨后管胃上提路径(OR=6.736,95% CI :1.623~27.965,P=0.009)是严重吻合口狭窄的独立危险因素。

结论

吻合口瘘、胸骨后上提路径是食管癌McKeown手术颈部吻合术后出现吻合口狭窄的独立危险因素。

Objective

To investigate the risk factors of benign anastomotic stenosis after neck anastomosis in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing three-incision esophagectomy (Mckeown surgery).

Methods

The data of patients who underwent Mckeown esophagectomy with tubular stomach for esophageal cancer in Shanghai Chest Hospital from September 2016 to August 2017 were selected and retrospectively analyzed. Patients with benign anastomotic stenosis after surgery and enduring 3 times or more dilations after operation were selected as the stenosis group. Patients with less than 3 times dilations or without dilatation were selected as the control group. In both group, each patient’s basic condition, ASA score, surgical method, reconstruction route, location of tubular stomach, R0 resection of tumor , anastomotic leakage were used to analyze the risk factors for anastomotic stenosis.

Results

Among the 271 patients, 9.6% of them had 3 times dilations or more. By univariate analyses, the factors including elder age(>70) , preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, hand suture anastomosis, retrostrernal reconstruction route, anastomotic leakage , whether achieving R0 resection or not are all related to severe anastomotic stenosis(P<0.05). However by multivariate logistic regression analyses, the condition of anastomotic leakage(OR=5.541, 95% CI: 2.110-14.549, P=0.001)and retro-strernal reconstruction route(OR=6.736, 95% CI : 1.623-27.965, P=0.009)are two independent risk factors for severe anastomotic stenosis.

Conclusions

Anastomotic leakage and retrostrernal reconstruction route are two independent risk factors for anastomotic stenosis after cervical anastomosis in esophageal cancer.

表1 食管癌术后吻合口狭窄的单因素分析[n(%)]
表2 食管癌患者术后吻合口狭窄的多因素分析
1
Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2015,65(2):87-108.
2
Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H, et al.Comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan, 2010[J]. Esophagus,2017, 14(3):189-214.
3
李志刚,张晓彬,郭旭峰,等.外科治疗食管鳞癌的长期生存结果——上海市胸科医院单中心结果分析[J].中华胸部外科电子杂志,2018,5(2):69-74.
4
Findlay L, Yao C, Bennett DH, Byrom R, et al.Non-inferiority of minimally invasive oesophagectomy:an 8-year retrospective case series[J].Surg Endosc, 2017,31(9):3681-3689.
5
Udagawa H, Akiyama H. Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer: Tokyo experience of the three-field technique[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2001,14(2):110-114.
6
Huang HT, Wang F, Shen L, et al. Comparison of thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis with McKeown esophagectomy for middle esophageal cancer[J].World J Surg Oncol,2015,13:310.
7
Luechakiettisak P, Kasetsunthorn S. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study[J].J Med Assoc Thai, 2008, 91(5):681-685.
8
van Heijl M, Gooszen JA, Fockens P. Risk factors for development of benign cervical strictures after esophagectomy[J].An Surg, 2010,251(6):1064-1069.
9
Ahmed Z, Elliott JA, King S, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic stricture post-esophagectomy with a standardized sutured anastomosis[J]. World J Surg, 2017,41(2):487-497.
10
曹伯雄,任光国,肖波,等.食管癌切除术后吻合口狭窄的原因[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2013,29(3):138-139.
11
Urschel JD. Esophagogastric anastomotic leaks: the importance of gastric ischemia and therapeutic applications of gastric conditioning[J]. J Invest Surg,1998,11(4):245-250.
12
Cassivi SD. Leaks, strictures, and necrosis: a review of anastomotic complications following esophagectomy[J]. SeminThorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2004,16(2):124-132.
13
Anegg U, Lindenmann J, Maier A, et al. Influence of route of gastric transposition on oxygen supply at cervical oesophagogastric anastomoses[J]. Br J Surg, 2008,95(3):344-349..
14
钟胜,吴清泉,孙苏安,等. 食管切除颈部消化道重建术后吻合口良性狭窄形成的影响因素[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2014,17(9):877-880.
15
Kondra J, Ong SR, Clifton J, et al. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reducesmorbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer[J]. Dis Esophagus,2008,21(5):422-429.
16
Beitler AL, Urschel JD. Comparison of stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomoses[J]. Am J Surg, 1998,175(4):337-340.
17
马敏杰,徐上清,胡文滕,等.食管切除后食管胃器械吻合与手工吻合疗效的Meta分析[J].现代肿瘤医学 2016, 24(15):2378-2383.
18
Xu QR, Wang KN, Wang WP, et a1. Linear stapled esophagogastrostomy is more effective than hand-sewn or circular stapler in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a comparative clinical study[J].J Gastrointest Surg, 2011, 15(6):915-921.
[1] 郭小琦, 张璞, 李小军, 余明, 王博. 口服醋酸泼尼松联合局部注射曲安奈德对食管早癌ESD术后食管狭窄及肺部感染的预防疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 288-291.
[2] 王增萌, 彭春辉, 吴东阳, 王凯, 闫俊, 黄心洁, 陈亚军. 先天性胆总管囊肿术后吻合口狭窄/肝内胆管结石的腹腔镜再手术经验[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 111-115.
[3] 段伟, 刘飞, 许光源, 程宇豪, 陈星. 食管癌调强放疗计划剂量学参数差异对放射性肺炎发生及严重程度的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 320-324.
[4] 陶金华, 陈珊珊, 陈晓四. 阿帕替尼联合替吉奥治疗晚期食管癌的疗效与安全性影响因素评价[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 325-329.
[5] 高建平, 王辉, 王淑萍. 定期家庭随访对胸腔镜食管癌术后饮食恢复功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 188-192.
[6] 侯超, 潘美辰, 吴文明, 黄兴广, 李翔, 程凌雪, 朱玉轩, 李文波. 早期食管癌及上皮内瘤变内镜黏膜下剥离术后食管狭窄的危险因素[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 383-387.
[7] 单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
[8] 曹旬旬, 费素娟. 食管癌患者肿瘤组织CXCL5和CXCR2的表达与病情和预后的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 299-304.
[9] 王超, 王浩, 孙柏, 袁野, 羌伟光, 石红兵. 卡非佐米联合碘-125粒子照射促进人食管癌细胞KYSE-150凋亡的机制研究[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 106-113.
[10] 李春光, 杨洋, 李斌, 华荣, 李志刚. 完全腹腔镜下管状胃制作技术在食管癌McKeown手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 219-224.
[11] 高鹏强, 林军鹏, 王佩元, 林辉, 周航, 魏文巍, 柳硕岩, 王枫. 胸段食管鳞状细胞癌中锁骨上淋巴结转移对预后的影响:一项大型回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 211-218.
[12] 徐立, 阎岩. aFGF修饰自体成纤维细胞治疗食管吻合口瘘的实验研究[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 180-187.
[13] 卢琪珏, 李斌, 杨超, 华荣, 李春光, 李志刚. 改良Grillo气管重建术在颈段食管癌挽救性食管切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(02): 91-95.
[14] 刘石健骢, 甘向峰, 吕良湛, 曹庆东. 机器人辅助充气式纵隔镜联合腹腔镜食管癌切除术初步探索[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(02): 104-108.
[15] 黄志宁, 王高祥, 崔世军, 柳常青, 孙效辉, 徐美青, 解明然. 术前纤维蛋白原与前白蛋白比值对可切除食管鳞癌患者预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(01): 23-30.
阅读次数
全文


摘要