切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胸部外科电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (01) : 30 -35. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8773.2020.01.005

所属专题: 文献

论著

胸腔镜肺段切除手术后多模镇痛的临床研究
米芳1, 刘敏1, 张淑云1, 汤汉清1, 邱美蓉1, 吕宝华1, 黄晓媚1, 卓龙彩1,()   
  1. 1. 361000 厦门,中国人民解放军陆军第73集团军医院胸外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-12 出版日期:2020-02-28
  • 通信作者: 卓龙彩

Clinical study on multimodal analgesia after thoracoscopic segmentectomy

Fang Mi1, Min Liu1, Shuyun Zhang1, Hanqing Tang1, Meirong Qiu1, Baohua Lyu1, XiaoMei Huang1, Longcai Zhuo1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, PLA 73rd Group Army Hospital, Xiamen, 361000, China
  • Received:2019-01-12 Published:2020-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Longcai Zhuo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhuo Longcai, Email:
引用本文:

米芳, 刘敏, 张淑云, 汤汉清, 邱美蓉, 吕宝华, 黄晓媚, 卓龙彩. 胸腔镜肺段切除手术后多模镇痛的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2020, 07(01): 30-35.

Fang Mi, Min Liu, Shuyun Zhang, Hanqing Tang, Meirong Qiu, Baohua Lyu, XiaoMei Huang, Longcai Zhuo. Clinical study on multimodal analgesia after thoracoscopic segmentectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Thoracic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 07(01): 30-35.

目的

观察和分析胸腔镜下肺段切除术后多模镇痛的效果和安全性。

方法

选取全身麻醉下行单操作孔胸腔镜下单肺段切除术的患者,按手术时间先后交替分入对照组(单纯自控静脉镇痛)和试验组(多模镇痛)。对照组仅于手术后予静脉镇痛泵止痛,疼痛明显时自控追加剂量,如疼痛仍无缓解,则追加吗啡皮下注射。试验组做手术切口和缝合切口时采取肋间神经保护的策略,胸腔内手术操作结束后行胸腔镜下肋间神经阻滞,胸腔内喷洒利多卡因,术后予静脉镇痛泵止痛同对照组。比较两组患者术后各时间点的Prince-Henry疼痛评分(PHPS)、按压镇痛泵和注射吗啡次数、住院时间及毒麻药品相关不良反应和并发症的发生情况。

结果

两组分别纳入41例患者,性别、身高、体重、手术肺段、手术时间等基础情况的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。试验组术后6、12、18、24 h的PHPS评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05),术后0~24 h、24~48 h按压镇痛泵次数和术后0~24 h注射吗啡次数均显著少于对照组(P<0.05);两组间术后36、48 h的PHPS评分、术后24~48 h注射吗啡次数、术后住院时间、毒麻药品相关不良反应发生率和术后并发症发生率的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

胸腔镜下肺段切除术后行多模镇痛的效果优于单纯的静脉镇痛泵镇痛,且实施简单,适合在临床推广。

Objective

To observe and analyze the effect and safety of multimodal analgesia after thoracoscopic segmentectomy.

Methods

Patients who underwent single-operator-orifice thoracoscopic segmentectomy under general anesthesia were selected and divided into control group (PCIA analgesia) and test group (multimodal analgesia) according to the operation time order alternately. The control group was only given an intravenous analgesic pump for pain relief after surgery, and the patients could press the analgesic pump for additional dose when the pain was obvious. If the pain did not improve, an additional hypodermic injection of morphine would be given. The experimental group adopted an intercostal neuroprotective strategy during surgical incision and suture incision. After intrathoracic surgery, thoracoscopic intercostal nerve block was performed, lidocaine was sprayed in the chest, and postoperative intravenous analgesia pump was given to relieve pain as in the control group. The pain PHPS scores of the two groups were recorded at 6 time points at 6h, 12h, 18h, 24h, 36h and 48h after surgery. The PHPS scores, the times of pressing the analgesic pump , the times of additional morphine injection within 0-24 hours and 24-48 hours after the operation, the postoperative hospital stay, the incidence of drug-related adverse reactions of anaesthesia, and the complication rate were recorded and compared between the two groups.

Results

41 patients were included in each group, and there were no statistically significant differences in gender, height, weight, location of the removed lung segment, operation time and other basic conditions (P>0.05). The PHPS scores at 6, 12, 18 and 24 h after operation in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The times of pressing PCIA and injecting morphine at 0-24h and 24-48h after the operation were also significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in PHPS scores at 36h and 48h after surgery, times of morphine injection at 24-48 h after surgery, postoperative hospital stay, incidence of drug-related side effects and complications (P>0.05).

Conclusions

After thoracoscopic segmentectomy, the above multimodal analgesia was better than intravenous analgesia pump analgesia, and it was simple to implement and suitable for clinical promotion.

图1 胸腔镜下肋间神经阻滞
表1 两组患者基本资料比较
表2 两组患者术后各时间点PHPS评分比较(±s,分)
表3 两组患者术后镇痛泵按压次数、吗啡注射次数和住院时间比较(±s)
[1]
Kwon S, Zhao L, Reddy R, et al. Evaluation of acute and chronic pain outcomes after robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, or open anatomic pulmonary resection[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2017, 154(2):652-659.
[2]
Palade E, Guenter J. Postoperative pain in the acute phase after surgery: VATS lobectomy vs. open lung resection - results of a prospective randomised trial[J].Zentralbl Chir, 2014, 139(S 01):S59-S66.
[3]
Doan LV, Augustus J, Androphy R, et al.Mitigating the impact of acute and chronic post-thoracotomy pain[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2014, 28(4):1048-1056.
[4]
朱建权,魏巍,赵洪伟,等. 改良式罗哌卡因肋间神经阻滞在胸腔镜手术中的应用[J]. 中国肿瘤临床,2019, 46(12):611-614.
[5]
林夏兰,周华成. 胸神经阻滞方法研究进展[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志,2017, 23 (11):851-854.
[6]
Ahmed Z, Samad K, Ullah H. Role of intercostal nerve block in reducing postoperative pain following video-assisted thoracoscopy: A randomized controlled trial[J]. Saudi J Anaesth, 2017, 11(1):54-57.
[7]
Vlassakov K, Vafai A, Ende D,et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of ultrasonographic visualization of proximal intercostal block vs paravertebral block[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2020, 20(1):13.
[8]
Deng K, Xu S J, Qian Y F, et al. Application of continuous serratus plane block with patient-controlled analgesia on postoperation analgesia after thoracoscopic surgery[J]. Zhonghua yi xue za zhi, 2018, 98(8):570-575.
[9]
Piccioni F, Segat M, Falini S, et al. Enhanced recovery pathways in thoracic surgery from Italian VATS Group: perioperative analgesia protocols[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2018, 10(S4):S555-S563.
[10]
Pinheiro V F, da Costa J M, Cascudo M M, et al. Analgesic efficacy of lidocaine and multimodal analgesia for chest tube removal: a randomized trial study[J]. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem, 2016, 23 (6):1000-1006.
[11]
Zhang X, Shu L, Lin C, et al. Comparison between intraoperative two-space injection thoracic paravertebral block and wound infiltration as a component of multimodal analgesia for postoperative pain management after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2015, 29(6):1550-1556.
[12]
Chen S, Zhu X, Huang L, et al. Optimal dose of ropivacaine for relieving cough-pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy by single intrapleural injection: A randomized, double-blind, controlled study[J]. Int J Surg, 2019, 69:132-138.
[13]
Samimi S, Taheri A, Davari Tanha F. Comparison between intraperitoneal and intravenous lidocaine for postoperative analgesia after elective abdominal hysterectomy, a double-blind placebo controlled study[J]. J Family Reprod Health, 2015, 9(4):193-198.
[14]
Perniola A, Magnuson A, Axelsson K, et al. Intraperitoneal local anesthetics have predominant local analgesic effect: a randomized, double-blind study[J]. Anesthesiology, 2014, 121(2):352-361.
[15]
Wang C F, Pancaro C, Gerner P, et al. Prolonged suppression of postincisional pain by a slow-release formulation of lidocaine[J]. Anesthesiology, 2011, 114(1):135- 149.
[1] 杨轲, 丁增巴姆, 马静, 李盼盼, 陈婷. 全程无缝隙肺康复训练在单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 801-804.
[2] 张卫锋, 张天翼, 赵正维, 王海强, 尹逊亮. VE /VCO2 斜率对肺癌肺叶切除术后心血管并发症的预测意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 725-730.
[3] 张璇, 高杨, 房雅君, 姚艳玲. 保护性机械通气在肺癌胸腔镜肺段切除术中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 563-567.
[4] 任甜甜, 张玉慧, 祁玲霞, 朱梅冬, 胡佳. 多学科疼痛管理对胸腔镜肺叶切除术后胸痛及应激反应的影响分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 630-633.
[5] 吕欣谕, 李雯, 王娟侠, 邹维, 王艳, 雷杰. 围手术期肺康复训练在胸腔镜肺叶切除术中疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 256-259.
[6] 胡航, 陈婷婷, 孙健, 孙云浩, 仇丽敏. 三维重建技术在单操作孔胸腔镜肺段切除术的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 310-312.
[7] 张红军, 顾兴, 赵延军, 柴雅琴, 李文洁, 师佩, 张海涛. 超声引导下胸膜活检与内科胸腔镜活检诊断一致性分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 185-188.
[8] 王冲, 闫东杰, 龚昌帆, 韩毅. 三维重建辅助胸腔镜胸膜剥脱术治疗包裹性脓胸的思路和技巧[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 164-167.
[9] 申宏, 成楠, 杨博, 申华, 张林, 李东, 李梁钢, 董士勇, 姜胜利. 全胸腔镜同期心肺联合手术治疗主动脉瓣关闭不全合并原发性肺癌[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 160-163.
[10] 陈轶维, 吴近近, 李奋, 孙彦隽, 郁夏风. 儿童左心耳起源房性心动过速镶嵌治疗一例[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 185-188.
[11] 陈小科, 吴晗, 丁征平. 胸腔镜下右肺上叶前段切除术[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 261-261.
[12] 王嘉巍, 张广健, 杜昊楠, 余宸傲, 张佳. 混合现实技术在肺结节手术中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 254-259.
[13] 蔡剑桥, 蒋雷. 单孔胸腔镜与开胸双袖式肺叶切除治疗非小细胞肺癌对比[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 225-230.
[14] 沈海锋, 吕方伊, 顾海华, 常志博, 陈盈, 王苹莉, 吴祖群, 邱福铭, 姚杰, 范军强. 局部进展期肺癌新辅助治疗后胸腔镜袖式肺叶切除术——浙江大学医学院附属第二医院2014—2023年56例回顾性分析[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 158-166.
[15] 裴耀飞, 耿俊峰, 王擎, 徐彪, 邹勤光, 张俊, 刘洋, 李志刚. 单孔胸腔镜右肺上叶S2切除术[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 208-208.
阅读次数
全文


摘要