切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胸部外科电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (01) : 41 -45. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8773.2022.01.06

综述

食管癌微创手术下胃食管吻合方式的应用进展
何晓峰1, 成强1, 喻傲1, 王涛1, 史敏科1,()   
  1. 1. 210008 南京,南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院胸外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-29 修回日期:2022-01-09 接受日期:2022-01-24 出版日期:2022-02-28
  • 通信作者: 史敏科
  • 基金资助:
    南京市医学重点科技发展项目(ZKX18019)

Progress in the application of gastroesophageal anastomosis via minimally invasive esophagectomy

Xiaofeng He1, Qiang Cheng1, Ao Yu1, Tao Wang1, Minke Shi1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Received:2021-11-29 Revised:2022-01-09 Accepted:2022-01-24 Published:2022-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Minke Shi
引用本文:

何晓峰, 成强, 喻傲, 王涛, 史敏科. 食管癌微创手术下胃食管吻合方式的应用进展[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2022, 09(01): 41-45.

Xiaofeng He, Qiang Cheng, Ao Yu, Tao Wang, Minke Shi. Progress in the application of gastroesophageal anastomosis via minimally invasive esophagectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Thoracic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 09(01): 41-45.

食管癌切除术仍然是目前治疗食管癌的首选方式,随着胸腹腔镜在食管癌手术中的广泛应用,食管癌的手术方式在变化,胃食管吻合方式也有所变化,吻合技术也在不断改进,因此有必要对食管癌微创手术时代下的胃食管吻合技术特点作归纳总结。不管是在颈部吻合还是在胸内吻合,关于手工吻合和器械吻合的优劣争论从未停止过,新的吻合方式和技巧也在不断研究改进中,好的吻合方式在尽量降低吻合口并发症的前提下,还需要操作简单可重复性强,以便外科医生容易掌握和推广。由于目前缺乏简单安全可靠的腔镜下胸内吻合方式,微创Ivor-Lewis术式的推广受到了限制,所以对于腔镜下的胸内吻合方式的研究将会是未来胃食管吻合方式研究中的重点。胸外科医生应致力于开发新的吻合方法或吻合器械来使吻合操作更简单化、更易于推广。

Esophagectomy is still the first choice for the treatment of esophageal cancer. With the wide application of thoracoscopy and laparoscopy in esophagectomy, the surgical methods of esophagectomy, the way of gastroesophageal anastomosis, and the anastomotic techniques are changing. In view of this, it is necessary to summarize the technical characteristics of gastroesophageal anastomosis in the era of minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer. The debate on the pros and cons of hand-sewn and mechanical gastroesophageal anastomosis whether in the neck or in the chest has never stopped. New anastomosis methods and techniques are also being studied and improved. On the premise of minimizing anastomotic complications, good anastomosis methods also need to be simple and repeatable, so that surgeons can easily master and popularize them. Currently, due to the deficiency of simple, safe and reliable endoscopic thoracic gastroesophageal anastomosis, the promotion of the minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis is limited. Therefore, research on endoscopic intrathoracic anastomosis will be the focus of future gastroesophageal anastomosis research. Thoracic surgeons should work on developing new anastomotic methods or instruments to make gastroesophageal anastomosis easier to scale.

1
Wormuth JK, Heitmiller RF.Esophageal conduit necrosis[J].Thorac Surg Clin200616(1): 11-22.
2
Plat VD, Bootsma BT, van der Wielen N,et al. Autologous Activated Fibrin Sealant for the Esophageal Anastomosis: A Feasibility Study[J].J Surg Res2019234: 49-53.
3
左杰斌,瞿文栋,周爱明,等.胸腹腔镜联合Ivor Lewis术与McKeown术治疗胸中下段食管癌近期疗效的系统评价与Meta分析[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志201724(6): 456-462.
4
林济红,康明强,林江波,等.胸腹腔镜联合食管癌Ivor-Lewis术与McKeown术近期疗效比较[J].中华胃肠外科杂志201417(9): 888-891.
5
Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Hawn MT. Technical aspects and early results of robotic esophagectomy with chest anastomosis[J].J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2013145(1): 90-96.
6
袁勇,陈龙奇.食管癌手术中食管胃吻合技术的选择及疗效评价[J].中华消化外科杂志201716(5): 454-458.
7
McKeown KC.Prospective randomized study of one- or two-layer anastomosis following oesophageal resection and cervical oesophagogastrostomy[J].Br J Surg199380(10): 1351.
8
Burch JM, Franciose RJ, Moore EE,et al.Single-layer continuous versus two-layer interrupted intestinal anastomosis: a prospective randomized trial[J].Ann Surg2000231(6): 832-837.
9
Yuan Y, Zeng XX, Zhao YF,et al.Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture[J].World J Surg201741(12): 3164-3170.
10
Haverkamp L, van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP,et al.End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study[J].Ann Surg2014259(1): e6.
11
Haverkamp L, van der Sluis PC, Verhage RJ,et al.End-to-end cervical esophagogastric anastomoses are associated with a higher number of strictures compared with end-to-side anastomoses[J].J Gastrointest Surg201317(5): 872-876.
12
Mao CY, Yang YS, Yuan Y,et al.End-to-End Versus End-to-Side Hand-Sewn Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy[J].Ann Surg Oncol201926(12): 4062-4069.
13
Wang Y, Zhang X, Jiang Y,et al.Comparison of hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis in esophageal cancer: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Medicine (Baltimore)201998(23): e15676.
14
姚圣,李宗杰,刘灿辉,等.胸腹腔镜联合食管癌切除食管胃左颈部吻合术视频要点[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志202027(5): 494-495.
15
Shibao K, Inoue Y, Sawatsubashi Y,et al.iTriangular Stapling Technique: A Novel Reconstruction Method and Clinical Outcomes of Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis after Esophagectomy[J].World J Surg202145(6): 1828-1834.
16
Tian Y, Li L, Li S,et al.Comparison of circular stapling, triangulating stapling and T-shape stapling for cervical anastomosis with minimally invasive esophagectomy[J].Ann Transl Med20208(24): 1679.
17
Wang Q, He XR, Shi CH,et al.Hand-Sewn Versus Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in the Neck: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials[J].Indian J Surg201577(2): 133-140.
18
Deng XF, Liu QX, Zhou D,et al.Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis[J].World J Gastroenterol201521(15): 4757-4764.
19
Rasihashemi SZ, Ramouz A, Beheshtirouy S,et al.Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study[J].BMC Gastroenterol202020(1): 250.
20
Mazza E, Strignano P, Fop F,et al.Semimechanical anastomosis during oesophagectomy reduces leaks and stenosis: a propensity score matched analysis[J].Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg202031(2): 182-190.
21
Li XK, Xu Y, Cong ZZ,et al.Modified Collard versus end-to-side hand-sewn anastomosis for cervical anastomosis after McKeown esophagectomy[J].Thorac Cancer202011(10): 2909-2915.
22
贾卓奇,李硕,王哲,等.手工分层吻合法与机械吻合法在胸腹腔镜食管癌切除术胃食管吻合中的应用对比观察[J].山东医药202161(15): 75-78.
23
严会志,张军,林称意,等.食管癌手术中采用左颈部T形全机械侧侧吻合术吻合对相关手术并发症的影响[J].临床外科杂志202028(4): 338-340.
24
张霄鹏,王会恩,张华,等.食管癌切除食管胃T形吻合与圆形吻合安全性的meta分析[J].中华胸部外科电子杂志20207(2): 83-89.
25
Charalabopoulos A, Davakis S, Syllaios A,et al.Intrathoracic hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in prone position during totally minimally invasive two-stage esophagectomy for esophageal cancer[J].Dis Esophagus202134:: doaa106.
26
Peri A, Furbetta N, Viganò J,et al.Technical details for a robot-assisted hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis during minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy[J].Surg Endosc202236(2): 1675-1682.
27
Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Lemoine PH,et al.Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy[J].Ann Thorac Surg200172(2): 593-596.
28
Misawa K, Hachisuka T, Kuno Y,et al.New procedure for purse-string suture in thoracoscopic esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis[J].Surg Endosc200519(1): 40-42.
29
Gao HJ, Mu JW, Pan WM,et al.Totally mechanical linear stapled anastomosis for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Operative technique and short-term outcomes[J].Thorac Cancer202011(3): 769-776.
30
方勇,郭卫刚,谭黎杰,等.改良自牵引Overlap法在Ivor Lewis手术食管胃胸内吻合中的应用价值[J].中华消化外科杂志201918(3): 274-278.
31
Yanni F, Singh P, Tewari N,et al.Comparison of Outcomes with Semi-mechanical and Circular Stapled Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis following Esophagectomy[J].World J Surg201943(10): 2483-2489.
32
Zhang H, Wang Z, Zheng Y,et al.Robotic Side-to-Side and End-to-Side Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis of Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer[J].World J Surg201943(12): 3074-3082.
[1] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[2] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[3] 黄勇, 郑智, 张海翘, 王龙, 辛城霖, 刘小野, 尹杰, 张军. 近端胃切除术后消化道重建方式的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 456-460.
[4] 李子禹, 王胤奎. 腹腔镜全胃切除术后消化道重建术式选择与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 364-367.
[5] 苏向前, 宋同鲲, 徐凯. 腹腔镜远端胃切除术后消化道重建术式选择与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 368-371.
[6] 潘玉霞, 魏曼莉, 魏金鑫, 董云生. SPLT联合间置空肠双通道吻合在腹腔镜近端胃切除术中的近期疗效和生活质量研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 380-384.
[7] 高加林, 曹亚娟. 腹腔镜解剖性肝右后叶切除治疗食管癌根治术后孤立性肝转移[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 239-242.
[8] 侯超, 潘美辰, 吴文明, 黄兴广, 李翔, 程凌雪, 朱玉轩, 李文波. 早期食管癌及上皮内瘤变内镜黏膜下剥离术后食管狭窄的危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 383-387.
[9] 单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
[10] 苏鹏, 吕会来, 温士旺, 黄超, 张缜, 田子强. 全腔镜下食管癌根治术围手术期呼吸系统并发症发生的危险因素分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 294-298.
[11] 曹旬旬, 费素娟. 食管癌患者肿瘤组织CXCL5和CXCR2的表达与病情和预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 299-304.
[12] 陈柯豫, 黄艳齐, 张玲利. 同时性多发早期食管癌及高级别上皮内瘤变的危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 524-528.
[13] 秦建军, 郭旭峰, 胡杨, 李向楠, 李卓毅, 林江波, 梅新宇, 唐鹏, 王长春, 王枫, 王洪琰, 尹俊, 袁勇, 赵晋波, 李志刚, 李印. 日本2022版食管癌诊治指南在中国的接受度——中国红杉树专家调研[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 195-199.
[14] 李正龙, 赵永生, 罗钶鑫, 彭忠勤. 胸腔镜切除治疗全内脏反位合并食管癌手术1例并文献复习[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 234-237.
[15] 孙天宇, 王如文, 蒋彬. 食管碰撞癌1例[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 238-240.
阅读次数
全文


摘要