切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胸部外科电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (01) : 41 -45. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8773.2022.01.06

综述

食管癌微创手术下胃食管吻合方式的应用进展
何晓峰1, 成强1, 喻傲1, 王涛1, 史敏科1,()   
  1. 1. 210008 南京,南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院胸外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-29 修回日期:2022-01-09 接受日期:2022-01-24 出版日期:2022-02-28
  • 通信作者: 史敏科
  • 基金资助:
    南京市医学重点科技发展项目(ZKX18019)

Progress in the application of gastroesophageal anastomosis via minimally invasive esophagectomy

Xiaofeng He1, Qiang Cheng1, Ao Yu1, Tao Wang1, Minke Shi1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Received:2021-11-29 Revised:2022-01-09 Accepted:2022-01-24 Published:2022-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Minke Shi
引用本文:

何晓峰, 成强, 喻傲, 王涛, 史敏科. 食管癌微创手术下胃食管吻合方式的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2022, 09(01): 41-45.

Xiaofeng He, Qiang Cheng, Ao Yu, Tao Wang, Minke Shi. Progress in the application of gastroesophageal anastomosis via minimally invasive esophagectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Thoracic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 09(01): 41-45.

食管癌切除术仍然是目前治疗食管癌的首选方式,随着胸腹腔镜在食管癌手术中的广泛应用,食管癌的手术方式在变化,胃食管吻合方式也有所变化,吻合技术也在不断改进,因此有必要对食管癌微创手术时代下的胃食管吻合技术特点作归纳总结。不管是在颈部吻合还是在胸内吻合,关于手工吻合和器械吻合的优劣争论从未停止过,新的吻合方式和技巧也在不断研究改进中,好的吻合方式在尽量降低吻合口并发症的前提下,还需要操作简单可重复性强,以便外科医生容易掌握和推广。由于目前缺乏简单安全可靠的腔镜下胸内吻合方式,微创Ivor-Lewis术式的推广受到了限制,所以对于腔镜下的胸内吻合方式的研究将会是未来胃食管吻合方式研究中的重点。胸外科医生应致力于开发新的吻合方法或吻合器械来使吻合操作更简单化、更易于推广。

Esophagectomy is still the first choice for the treatment of esophageal cancer. With the wide application of thoracoscopy and laparoscopy in esophagectomy, the surgical methods of esophagectomy, the way of gastroesophageal anastomosis, and the anastomotic techniques are changing. In view of this, it is necessary to summarize the technical characteristics of gastroesophageal anastomosis in the era of minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer. The debate on the pros and cons of hand-sewn and mechanical gastroesophageal anastomosis whether in the neck or in the chest has never stopped. New anastomosis methods and techniques are also being studied and improved. On the premise of minimizing anastomotic complications, good anastomosis methods also need to be simple and repeatable, so that surgeons can easily master and popularize them. Currently, due to the deficiency of simple, safe and reliable endoscopic thoracic gastroesophageal anastomosis, the promotion of the minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis is limited. Therefore, research on endoscopic intrathoracic anastomosis will be the focus of future gastroesophageal anastomosis research. Thoracic surgeons should work on developing new anastomotic methods or instruments to make gastroesophageal anastomosis easier to scale.

1
Wormuth JK, Heitmiller RF.Esophageal conduit necrosis[J].Thorac Surg Clin200616(1): 11-22.
2
Plat VD, Bootsma BT, van der Wielen N,et al. Autologous Activated Fibrin Sealant for the Esophageal Anastomosis: A Feasibility Study[J].J Surg Res2019234: 49-53.
3
左杰斌,瞿文栋,周爱明,等.胸腹腔镜联合Ivor Lewis术与McKeown术治疗胸中下段食管癌近期疗效的系统评价与Meta分析[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志201724(6): 456-462.
4
林济红,康明强,林江波,等.胸腹腔镜联合食管癌Ivor-Lewis术与McKeown术近期疗效比较[J].中华胃肠外科杂志201417(9): 888-891.
5
Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Hawn MT. Technical aspects and early results of robotic esophagectomy with chest anastomosis[J].J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2013145(1): 90-96.
6
袁勇,陈龙奇.食管癌手术中食管胃吻合技术的选择及疗效评价[J].中华消化外科杂志201716(5): 454-458.
7
McKeown KC.Prospective randomized study of one- or two-layer anastomosis following oesophageal resection and cervical oesophagogastrostomy[J].Br J Surg199380(10): 1351.
8
Burch JM, Franciose RJ, Moore EE,et al.Single-layer continuous versus two-layer interrupted intestinal anastomosis: a prospective randomized trial[J].Ann Surg2000231(6): 832-837.
9
Yuan Y, Zeng XX, Zhao YF,et al.Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture[J].World J Surg201741(12): 3164-3170.
10
Haverkamp L, van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP,et al.End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study[J].Ann Surg2014259(1): e6.
11
Haverkamp L, van der Sluis PC, Verhage RJ,et al.End-to-end cervical esophagogastric anastomoses are associated with a higher number of strictures compared with end-to-side anastomoses[J].J Gastrointest Surg201317(5): 872-876.
12
Mao CY, Yang YS, Yuan Y,et al.End-to-End Versus End-to-Side Hand-Sewn Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy[J].Ann Surg Oncol201926(12): 4062-4069.
13
Wang Y, Zhang X, Jiang Y,et al.Comparison of hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis in esophageal cancer: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Medicine (Baltimore)201998(23): e15676.
14
姚圣,李宗杰,刘灿辉,等.胸腹腔镜联合食管癌切除食管胃左颈部吻合术视频要点[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志202027(5): 494-495.
15
Shibao K, Inoue Y, Sawatsubashi Y,et al.iTriangular Stapling Technique: A Novel Reconstruction Method and Clinical Outcomes of Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis after Esophagectomy[J].World J Surg202145(6): 1828-1834.
16
Tian Y, Li L, Li S,et al.Comparison of circular stapling, triangulating stapling and T-shape stapling for cervical anastomosis with minimally invasive esophagectomy[J].Ann Transl Med20208(24): 1679.
17
Wang Q, He XR, Shi CH,et al.Hand-Sewn Versus Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in the Neck: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials[J].Indian J Surg201577(2): 133-140.
18
Deng XF, Liu QX, Zhou D,et al.Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis[J].World J Gastroenterol201521(15): 4757-4764.
19
Rasihashemi SZ, Ramouz A, Beheshtirouy S,et al.Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study[J].BMC Gastroenterol202020(1): 250.
20
Mazza E, Strignano P, Fop F,et al.Semimechanical anastomosis during oesophagectomy reduces leaks and stenosis: a propensity score matched analysis[J].Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg202031(2): 182-190.
21
Li XK, Xu Y, Cong ZZ,et al.Modified Collard versus end-to-side hand-sewn anastomosis for cervical anastomosis after McKeown esophagectomy[J].Thorac Cancer202011(10): 2909-2915.
22
贾卓奇,李硕,王哲,等.手工分层吻合法与机械吻合法在胸腹腔镜食管癌切除术胃食管吻合中的应用对比观察[J].山东医药202161(15): 75-78.
23
严会志,张军,林称意,等.食管癌手术中采用左颈部T形全机械侧侧吻合术吻合对相关手术并发症的影响[J].临床外科杂志202028(4): 338-340.
24
张霄鹏,王会恩,张华,等.食管癌切除食管胃T形吻合与圆形吻合安全性的meta分析[J].中华胸部外科电子杂志20207(2): 83-89.
25
Charalabopoulos A, Davakis S, Syllaios A,et al.Intrathoracic hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in prone position during totally minimally invasive two-stage esophagectomy for esophageal cancer[J].Dis Esophagus202134:: doaa106.
26
Peri A, Furbetta N, Viganò J,et al.Technical details for a robot-assisted hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis during minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy[J].Surg Endosc202236(2): 1675-1682.
27
Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Lemoine PH,et al.Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy[J].Ann Thorac Surg200172(2): 593-596.
28
Misawa K, Hachisuka T, Kuno Y,et al.New procedure for purse-string suture in thoracoscopic esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis[J].Surg Endosc200519(1): 40-42.
29
Gao HJ, Mu JW, Pan WM,et al.Totally mechanical linear stapled anastomosis for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Operative technique and short-term outcomes[J].Thorac Cancer202011(3): 769-776.
30
方勇,郭卫刚,谭黎杰,等.改良自牵引Overlap法在Ivor Lewis手术食管胃胸内吻合中的应用价值[J].中华消化外科杂志201918(3): 274-278.
31
Yanni F, Singh P, Tewari N,et al.Comparison of Outcomes with Semi-mechanical and Circular Stapled Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis following Esophagectomy[J].World J Surg201943(10): 2483-2489.
32
Zhang H, Wang Z, Zheng Y,et al.Robotic Side-to-Side and End-to-Side Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis of Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer[J].World J Surg201943(12): 3074-3082.
[1] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[2] 黄昌明, 郑华龙, 郑红红. 腹腔镜胃癌全胃切除术消化道重建术式选择与策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 123-126.
[3] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[4] 郭小琦, 张璞, 李小军, 余明, 王博. 口服醋酸泼尼松联合局部注射曲安奈德对食管早癌ESD术后食管狭窄及肺部感染的预防疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 288-291.
[5] 袁丹艳, 鲁静, 王丽娇, 岳彩迎, 范博士, 王蓉蓉. 肺康复训练在MIE围术期的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 131-133.
[6] 李临川, 李戊阳, 程玉刚, 朱健康, 张光永. 近端胃切除术后消化道重建方式的现状与展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 135-140.
[7] 曹猛, 郭杰东, 朱灿, 许腾, 樊瑞智, 江涛, 宋军, 徐溢新. 完全腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中顺蠕动侧侧吻合的有效性及安全性评价[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 315-319.
[8] 段伟, 刘飞, 许光源, 程宇豪, 陈星. 食管癌调强放疗计划剂量学参数差异对放射性肺炎发生及严重程度的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 320-324.
[9] 陶金华, 陈珊珊, 陈晓四. 阿帕替尼联合替吉奥治疗晚期食管癌的疗效与安全性影响因素评价[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 325-329.
[10] 高建平, 王辉, 王淑萍. 定期家庭随访对胸腔镜食管癌术后饮食恢复功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 188-192.
[11] 王超, 王浩, 孙柏, 袁野, 羌伟光, 石红兵. 卡非佐米联合碘-125粒子照射促进人食管癌细胞KYSE-150凋亡的机制研究[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 106-113.
[12] 高鹏强, 林军鹏, 王佩元, 林辉, 周航, 魏文巍, 柳硕岩, 王枫. 胸段食管鳞状细胞癌中锁骨上淋巴结转移对预后的影响:一项大型回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 211-218.
[13] 李春光, 杨洋, 李斌, 华荣, 李志刚. 完全腹腔镜下管状胃制作技术在食管癌McKeown手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 219-224.
[14] 卢琪珏, 李斌, 杨超, 华荣, 李春光, 李志刚. 改良Grillo气管重建术在颈段食管癌挽救性食管切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(02): 91-95.
[15] 刘石健骢, 甘向峰, 吕良湛, 曹庆东. 机器人辅助充气式纵隔镜联合腹腔镜食管癌切除术初步探索[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(02): 104-108.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?