切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胸部外科电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 49 -55. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8773.2026.01.05

论著

肺癌患者胸腔镜术后肺部感染预测模型的构建与比较
徐璐1,(), 刘晶莹2, 李梦莹1, 黄菊3, 谈慧颖4   
  1. 1212021 镇江,镇江市第三人民医院/江苏大学附属镇江三院药剂科
    2212021 镇江,镇江市第三人民医院/江苏大学附属镇江三院外科
    3212021 镇江,镇江市第三人民医院/江苏大学附属镇江三院公共卫生与感染管理部
    4212021 镇江,镇江市第三人民医院/江苏大学附属镇江三院医务与对外合作部
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-11 修回日期:2026-01-20 接受日期:2026-02-06 出版日期:2026-02-28
  • 通信作者: 徐璐
  • 基金资助:
    国家传染病医学中心项目(HX2025035); 江苏大学2023年度医教协同创新基金(JDYY2023050)

Construction and comparison of prediction models for pulmonary infection after thoracoscopic surgery in lung cancer patients

Lu Xu1,(), Jingying Liu2, Mengying Li1, Ju Huang3, Huiying Tan4   

  1. 1Department of Pharmacy, The Third People’s Hospital of Zhenjiang/Zhenjiang Third Hospital Affiliated to Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212021, China
    2Department of Surgery, The Third People’s Hospital of Zhenjiang/Zhenjiang Third Hospital Affiliated to Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212021, China
    3Department of Public Health and Infection Management, The Third People’s Hospital of Zhenjiang/Zhenjiang Third Hospital Affiliated to Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212021, China
    4Department of Medical and External Cooperation, The Third People’s Hospital of Zhenjiang/Zhenjiang Third Hospital Affiliated to Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212021, China
  • Received:2025-11-11 Revised:2026-01-20 Accepted:2026-02-06 Published:2026-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Lu Xu
引用本文:

徐璐, 刘晶莹, 李梦莹, 黄菊, 谈慧颖. 肺癌患者胸腔镜术后肺部感染预测模型的构建与比较[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2026, 13(01): 49-55.

Lu Xu, Jingying Liu, Mengying Li, Ju Huang, Huiying Tan. Construction and comparison of prediction models for pulmonary infection after thoracoscopic surgery in lung cancer patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Thoracic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 13(01): 49-55.

目的

基于多因素logistic回归、决策树以及神经网络,分别建立肺癌患者胸腔镜术后肺部感染预测模型,并比较三个模型性能。

方法

选取2022年10月1日至2025年3月31日在镇江市第三人民医院、句容市人民医院、丹阳市第三人民医院行胸腔镜下肺部切除术的肺癌住院患者,收集患者基本信息、体征检查、既往病史、肺功能指数、手术情况、肿瘤情况等。根据是否发生肺部感染将患者分为肺部感染组和非肺部感染组,单因素分析比较两组差异。将单因素分析中有统计学意义的因素作为自变量,纳入多因素logistic回归、决策树和神经网络,构建预测模型,并比较三种模型的灵敏度、特异度、约登指数和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)。

结果

共计1 262例患者纳入研究,其中230例发生肺部感染,发生率为18.22%。多因素logistic回归显示年龄(≥60岁)、性别、吸烟史、慢性肺部疾病史、住院时间(≥10天)为肺癌患者胸腔镜术后发生肺部感染的独立危险因素,决策树模型得到4个解释变量,即年龄(≥60岁)、血清白蛋白水平(<35 g/L)、住院时间(≥10天)、吸烟史,神经网络模型提示前五位危险因素为年龄(≥60岁)、血清白蛋白水平(<35 g/L)、慢性肺部疾病史、住院时间(≥10天)、吸烟史。以上三种模型的准确度分别为84.9%、81.5%、86.7%,灵敏度分别为77.2%、73.2%、75.4%,特异度分别为80.3%、76.8%、82.7%,约登指数分别为0.575、0.520、0.581,AUC分别为0.831、0.796、0.857(P<0.05)。

结论

与多因素logistic回归模型及决策树模型相比,神经网络模型对肺癌患者胸腔镜术后肺部感染的预测性能更佳。

Objective

To establish and compare three prediction models for pulmonary infection after thoracoscopic surgery in lung cancer patients based on multivariate logistic regression, decision tree, and neural network.

Methods

Patients with lung cancer who underwent thoracoscopic lung resection in Zhenjiang Third People’s Hospital, Jurong People’s Hospital, and Danyang Third People’s Hospital from October 1, 2022 to March 31, 2025 were selected. Data on patient demographics, physical examination findings, past medical history, pulmonary function indices, surgical conditions, and tumor conditions of the patients were collected. The patients were divided into a pulmonary infection group and a non-pulmonary infection group based on the occurrence of pulmonary infection. The differences between the two groups were compared through univariate analysis. The variables with statistical significance in the univariate analysis were selected as independent variables for multivariate logistic regression, decision tree, and neural network to construct the prediction models, and the sensitivity, specificity, Youden index, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of the three models were compared.

Results

A total of 1 262 patients were included in the study, of whom 230 cases had pulmonary infection, with an incidence of 18.22%. Multivariate logistic regression showed that age (≥60 years), gender, smoking history, history of chronic pulmonary diseases, and hospitalization time (≥10 days) were independent risk factors for postoperative pulmonary infection. The decision tree model obtained 4 explanatory variables: age (≥60 years), serum albumin level (<35 g/L), hospitalization time (≥10 days), and smoking history. The neural network model suggested that the top five risk factors were age (≥60 years), serum albumin level (<35 g/L), history of chronic pulmonary diseases, hospitalization time (≥10 days), and smoking history. The accuracy of the three models was 84.9%, 81.5%, and 86.7%, respectively. The sensitivity was 77.2%, 73.2%, and 75.4%; specificity was 80.3%, 76.8%, and 82.7%; Youden index was 0.575, 0.520, and 0.581; and the AUC was 0.831, 0.796, and 0.857, respectively (all P<0.05).

Conclusions

Compared with the multivariate logistic regression model and the decision tree model, the neural network model has better predictive performance for pulmonary infection after thoracoscopic surgery in lung cancer patients.

表1 肺部感染组和非肺部感染组患者临床资料单因素分析
表2 训练集患者发生肺部感染的logistic回归分析
图1 肺癌患者胸腔镜术后肺部感染危险因素的决策树模型
图2 三种预测模型的ROC曲线。ROC:受试者工作特征
1
Qi J, Li M, Wang L, et al. National and subnational trends in cancer burden in China, 2005-20: an analysis of national mortality surveillance data[J]. Lancet Public Health, 2023, 8(12): e943-e955.
2
国家卫生健康委办公厅. 原发性肺癌诊疗指南(2022年版)[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2022, 13(4): 549-570.
3
Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74(3): 229-263.
4
Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aisner DL, Akerley W, Bauman JR, Bharat A, et al. Nonsmall cell lung cancer, version 3.2022, nccn clinical practice guidelines in oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Cancer Network: JNCCN, 2022, 20(5): 497-530.
5
中国临床肿瘤学会(CSCO). CSCO非小细胞肺癌诊疗指南(2024版)[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2024.
6
Zhao D, Ma A, Li S, et al. Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting pulmonary complications after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in elderly patients with lung cancer[J]. Front Oncol, 2023, 13: 1265204.
7
Song Y, Liu J, Lei M, et al. An External-Validated Algorithm to Predict Postoperative Pneumonia Among Elderly Patients With Lung Cancer After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 777564.
8
杨栋梁, 周胜年, 胡泽东, 等. 基于诺曼图构建非小细胞肺癌患者单孔胸腔镜手术后肺部并发症风险预测模型[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2023, 51(9): 924-926.
9
陈国平, 范平明, 陈峙霖. 胸腔镜肺癌根治术后肺部感染危险因素及血清指标的预测价值[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2022, 32(13): 2005-2009.
10
李永杰, 闫其星, 周源, 等. sTREM-1、HMGB1和内毒素对胸腔镜肺癌根治术后肺部感染的预测价值[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2023, 22(10): 1065-1069.
11
中华医学会呼吸病学分会感染学组. 中国成人医院获得性肺炎与呼吸机相关性肺炎诊断与治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2018, 41(4): 255-280.
12
Nahm FS. Receiver operating characteristic curve: overview and practical use for clinicians[J]. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2022, 75(1): 25-36.
13
苏远力, 朱政. 123例呼吸科门诊患者吸烟问卷调查[J]. 临床肺科杂志, 2021, 26(11): 1668-1672.
14
胡笑笑, 蒋园芳, 楼晓庆. 呼吸内科医院感染的危险因素与中医管理对策[J].中医药管理杂志, 2025, 33(12): 250-252.
15
王斌权, 张金唐宏, 文静, 等. 2023-2024年某三甲医院医院感染监测数据报告[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2025, 35(20): 3132-3136.
16
Bugge A, Lund MB, Brunborg C, et al. Survival After Surgical Resection for Lung Cancer in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2016, 101(6): 2125-2131.
17
丁理星, 夏俊, 魏文学. 肺癌患者胸腔镜术后胸腔积液发生的列线图预测模型构建[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2022, 37(9): 1544-1548.
18
宋明, 刘芸宏, 吴晓慧, 等. 基于决策树和神经网络预测脑卒中手术患者医院感染危险因素[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2022, 39(2): 253-256.
19
周浦城, 李从利, 王勇, 等. 深度卷积神经网络原理与实践[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2020: 11-18.
[1] 熊梓宏, 孙超, 张宁, 卢宾, 向玺, 罗小丽, 张国英. 脓毒症相关性脑病患儿颅内压增高风险预测的列线图模型构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 447-455.
[2] 贺智恒, 姚德炯, 孙东方. 腹腔镜下胆囊切除术后胆瘘影响因素分析及风险预测模型的构建[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 175-178.
[3] 罗仲燃, 曾智豪, 黄梦娟, 何晓艺. 乳腺癌术后腋窝淋巴结负荷的多因素分析及预测模型的建立及验证[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 46-50.
[4] 谷瑞辰, 林福杨, 刘永达. 术前尿培养阴性患者PCNL术后尿路感染的预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 772-777.
[5] 许志翱, 顾丽萍, 曹敏, 宣梦馨, 李艳婷, 赵丽亭. 基于加速康复外科和预康复模式对老年肺癌围术期多维度管理干预及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 979-984.
[6] 俞颖倩, 徐兴祥. 淋巴结转移与非转移对原发性支气管肺癌免疫微环境及免疫治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 1027-1030.
[7] 黄少坚, 梁汉标, 李清平, 唐善华, 李青妍, 李芷西, 黄灿, 王小振, 陈灿辉, 王恺, 李川江. 基于影像组学和临床特征构建肝癌新辅助/转化治疗后病理学完全缓解预测模型[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 860-867.
[8] 宋丽娜, 安鹏. CTP跨时相放射组学模型预测急性脑梗死溶栓后出血转化风险[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 342-351.
[9] 杨雪峰, 孙涛, 石磊, 王岳峰, 冯世英, 张振才, 崔莹莹, 谷天祥. DeepSeek+3D数字模拟下同轴多象限的125I粒子植入治疗肺癌[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(10): 772-778.
[10] 王超, 张晓会, 李晓帆, 赵海丹. 维持性血液透析患者感染与心脑血管死亡风险的比较及联合预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(09): 675-681.
[11] 郭岩, 赵灵芝, 石光英. 代谢相关脂肪性肝病患者发生冠心病的风险预测模型[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(09): 682-688.
[12] 于少华, 苏飞, 芦永斌, 袁芳芸, 阚晓燕, 张涛, 侯小明. 基于血清电解质水平构建列线图模型对广泛期小细胞肺癌患者的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(08): 574-581.
[13] 皇立媛, 浦洁, 王苏贵, 陈婷婷, 朱德慧, 胡雪. 中青年脑卒中患者应激障碍风险预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(07): 504-512.
[14] 王春茂, 韩鸣, 王子彤. 局限期小细胞肺癌新辅助治疗后完全病理学缓解五例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(07): 550-554.
[15] 王继林, 李文洁, 何准. 胸腔镜术后切口缝合及引流管固定方式改进的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2026, 13(01): 14-27.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?