切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胸部外科电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (02) : 69 -74. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8773.2018.02.01

所属专题: 文献

论著

外科治疗食管鳞癌的长期生存结果——上海市胸科医院单中心结果分析
李志刚1,(), 张晓彬1, 郭旭峰1, 孙益峰1, 杨煜1, 李斌1, 顾海勇1, 华荣1, 茅腾1   
  1. 1. 200030 上海交通大学附属胸科医院胸外科 上海交通大学食管疾病诊治中心
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-20 出版日期:2018-05-28
  • 通信作者: 李志刚

Long-term results of squamous cell esophageal cancer after surgical treatment in China, single center experience of Shanghai Chest Hospital

Zhigang Li1,(), Xiaobin Zhang1, Xufeng Guo1, Yifeng Sun1, Yu Yang1, Bin Li1, Haiyong Gu1, Rong Hua1, Teng Mao1   

  1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Section of Esophageal Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, China
  • Received:2017-02-20 Published:2018-05-28
  • Corresponding author: Zhigang Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Zhigang, Email:
引用本文:

李志刚, 张晓彬, 郭旭峰, 孙益峰, 杨煜, 李斌, 顾海勇, 华荣, 茅腾. 外科治疗食管鳞癌的长期生存结果——上海市胸科医院单中心结果分析[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2018, 05(02): 69-74.

Zhigang Li, Xiaobin Zhang, Xufeng Guo, Yifeng Sun, Yu Yang, Bin Li, Haiyong Gu, Rong Hua, Teng Mao. Long-term results of squamous cell esophageal cancer after surgical treatment in China, single center experience of Shanghai Chest Hospital[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Thoracic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 05(02): 69-74.

目的

分析外科治疗食管鳞癌的长期生存结果及影响因素。

方法

回顾上海市胸科医院2012—2014年间外科治疗的所有食管鳞癌患者,选取其中经胸手术患者864例作为研究对象,分析患者的一般情况、手术方式、术后恢复及长期生存结果和影响因素。

结果

864例患者中,男性占84.7%;cⅡ期和cⅢ期患者分别占44.9%%和30.4%。8.3%的患者采用新辅助治疗。右胸进路手术占88.7%,微创食管癌切除术(MIE)占23.6%。手术总体并发症发生率为41.8%;90 d病死率为3.1%;总体复发率为38.1%;1、3、5年总体生存率分别为85.5%、61.2%和49.3%。MIE患者的远期生存率为66.5%,高于开放手术的44.0%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。与未行术后辅助治疗患者比较,术后辅助治疗在淋巴结阳性患者和阴性的T3N0患者中均显示可以改善总体生存率(33.3% vs 31.5%,P=0.001;66.0% vs 49.5%,P=0.004)。

结论

外科手术联合术后辅助治疗可以获得比较满意的食管鳞癌远期生存效果,新辅助治疗的作用需进一步研究。

Objective

To analyze the long-term survival rates and influencing factors of surgical treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods

All patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent surgical treatment at Shanghai Chest Hospital from 2012 to 2014 were reviewed. 864 patients undergoing transthoracic surgery were selected as the study subjects. Their general conditions, surgical approaches, postoperative complications, and long-term survival outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Of all the patients, 84.7% were men, and 44.9% and 30.4% were cII and cIII patients, respectively. Neoadjuvant therapy was used in 8.3% of patients. The right thoracic approach was used in 88.7% of patients. The proportion of minimally invasive surgery was 23.6%. The overall complication rate was 41.8%, and the 90-day mortality rate was 3.1%. The recurrence rate was 38.1%. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates were 85.5%, 61.2%, and 49.3%, respectively. Minimally invasive surgery improved long-term survival (MIE vs OPEN 66.5% vs 44.0%, P<0.001). Adjuvant therapy was shown to improve overall survival in both lymph node positive and negative T3N0 patients (33.3% vs 31.5%, P=0.001; 66.0% vs 49.5%, P=0.004).

Conclusions

Surgical resection combined with postoperative adjuvant therapy can achieve satisfactory long-term survival of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The role of neoadjuvant therapy requires further study.

表1 864例食管癌患者的基线资料[n(%)]
表2 864例食管癌患者术中、术后结果
表3 864例食管癌患者术后并发症发生情况
图1 复发转移模式图
表4 309例食管癌患者的复发模式
图2 864例食管癌患者术后总体生存率
图3 食管癌患者行微创和开放手术后总体生存率比较。A.未匹配前两组比较;B.经过倾向性评分匹配后两组比较(匹配因素包括年龄、BMI、ASA分级、肿瘤位置、手术路径、新辅助治疗和术后病理分期)
图4 食管癌患者术后辅助治疗对生存结果的影响。A. pN患者总体生存率;B. pN患者无病生存率;C. pT2N0M0患者总体生存率;D. pT2N0M0患者无病生存率;E. pT3N0M0患者总体生存率;F. pT3N0M0患者无病生存率
1
Zeng H, Zheng R, Guo Y, et al. Cancer survival in China, 2003-2005: a population-based study [J]. Int J Cancer, 2015, 136(8):1921-1930.
2
Zhang X, Yang Y, Ye B, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is a safe surgical treatment for locally advanced pathologic T3 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [J]. J Thorac Dis, 2017,9(9):2982-2991.
3
Zeng Y, Liang W, Liu J, et al. Esophageal cancer in elderly patients: a population-based study [J]. J Thorac Dis, 2018,10(1):448-457.
4
Chen JG, Chen HZ, Zhu J, et al. Cancer survival in patients from a hospital-based cancer registry, China [J]. J Cancer, 2018,9(5):851-860.
5
Wong MCS, Hamilton W, Whiteman DC, et al. Global Incidence and mortality of oesophageal cancer and their correlation with socioeconomic indicators temporal patterns and trends in 41 countries [J]. Sci Rep, 2018,8(1):4522.
6
Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H, et al. Comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan, 2009 [J]. Esophagus, 2016,13:110-137.
7
Ohkura Y, Shindoh J, Ueno M, et al. Comparison of outcome of esophagectomy versus nonsurgical treatment for resectable esophageal cancer with clinical complete response to neoadjuvant therapy [J].Ann Surg Oncol. 2018. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6437-2. [Epub ahead of print]
8
Ichikawa H, Kosugi SI, Kanda T, et al. Surgical and long-term outcomes following oesophagectomy in oesophageal cancer patients with comorbidity [J]. Int J Surg,2016,36(PtA):212-218.
9
Koo DH, Park SI, Kim YH, et al. Phase II study of use of a single cycle of induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy containing capecitabine/cisplatin followed by surgery for patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: long-term follow-up data [J]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 2012,69(3):655-663.
10
Park S, Hwang Y, Lee HJ, et al. Comparison of robot-assisted esophagectomy and thoracoscopic esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [J]. J Thorac Dis, 2016,8(10):2853-2861.
11
Li B, Xiang J, Zhang Y, et al. Comparison of Ivor-Lewis vs Sweet esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial [J]. JAMA Surg, 2015,150(4):292-298.
12
Wang ZQ, Wang WP, Yuan Y, et al. Left thoracotomy for middle or lower thoracic esophageal carcinoma: still Sweet enough? [J] J Thorac Dis, 2016,8(11):3187-3196.
13
Wang ZQ, Deng HY, Hu Y, et al. Prognostic value of right upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy in Sweet procedure for esophageal cancer [J]. J Thorac Dis, 2016,8(12):3625-3632.
14
Ma J, Zhan C, Wang L, et al. The sweet approach is still worthwhile in modern esophagectomy [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2014,97(5):1728-1733.
15
Wang H, Shen Y, Feng M, et al. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches [J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2015,149(4):1006-1014.
16
Nafteux P, Moons J, Coosemans W, et al. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: a valuable alternative to open oesophagectomy for the treatment of early oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma [J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2011,40(6):1455-1463.
17
Lazzarino AI, Nagpal K, Bottle A, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: trends of utilization and associated outcomes in England [J]. Ann Surg, 2010,252(2):292-298.
18
Dolan JP, Kaur T, Diggs BS, et al. Impact of comorbidity on outcomes and overall survival after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer [J]. Surg Endosc, 2013:27(11):4094-4103.
19
Kataoka K, Takeuchi H, Mizusawa J, et al. A randomized Phase Ⅲ trial of thoracoscopic versus open esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1409 [J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2016:46(2):174-177.
20
Kurihara M, Izumi T, Yoshida S, et al. A cooperative randomized study on tegafur plus mitomycin C versus combined tegafur and uracil plus mitomycin C in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer[J]. Jpn J Cancer Res,1991:82(5):613-620.
[1] 朱洪宇, 曹越, 赵鑫洋, 周毅. 三孔全腔镜手术治疗中重度男性乳房发育症[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 152-157.
[2] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会. 中国活体肝移植供者微创手术技术指南(2024版)[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 241-252.
[3] 姜露, 周菊, 毛杨, 代黔. 单细胞和bulk RNA测序的综合分析预测肺鳞状细胞癌治疗反应和预后[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 535-542.
[4] 张宗明, 董家鸿, 何小东, 王秋生, 徐智, 刘立民, 张翀. 老年胆道外科热点问题的争议与思考[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 754-762.
[5] 曹文钰, 郭鹏, 李锦平. 微创手术及非手术方式治疗慢性硬膜下血肿的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 304-309.
[6] 李新宇, 梁建锋. 3D打印导板辅助颅内血肿穿刺引流手术[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 382-384.
[7] 段伟, 刘飞, 许光源, 程宇豪, 陈星. 食管癌调强放疗计划剂量学参数差异对放射性肺炎发生及严重程度的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 320-324.
[8] 陶金华, 陈珊珊, 陈晓四. 阿帕替尼联合替吉奥治疗晚期食管癌的疗效与安全性影响因素评价[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 325-329.
[9] 高建平, 王辉, 王淑萍. 定期家庭随访对胸腔镜食管癌术后饮食恢复功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 188-192.
[10] 朱芮晴, 张荣贵, 冯秀雪, 张波, 刘圣圳, 柴宁莉, 令狐恩强. 基于倾向性评分匹配法的日间消化内镜超级微创手术治疗直肠神经内分泌肿瘤的疗效评价[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 166-170.
[11] 高鹏强, 林军鹏, 王佩元, 林辉, 周航, 魏文巍, 柳硕岩, 王枫. 胸段食管鳞状细胞癌中锁骨上淋巴结转移对预后的影响:一项大型回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 211-218.
[12] 李春光, 杨洋, 李斌, 华荣, 李志刚. 完全腹腔镜下管状胃制作技术在食管癌McKeown手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 219-224.
[13] 沈海锋, 吕方伊, 顾海华, 常志博, 陈盈, 王苹莉, 吴祖群, 邱福铭, 姚杰, 范军强. 局部进展期肺癌新辅助治疗后胸腔镜袖式肺叶切除术——浙江大学医学院附属第二医院2014—2023年56例回顾性分析[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 158-166.
[14] 王睿臻, 段晓峰, 姜宏景. 食管鳞癌喉返神经旁淋巴结清扫及功能保护相关研究进展[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 201-207.
[15] 尤旭颖, 吴苏果, 张泽, 王坤宁, 袁红霞. 食管鳞状细胞癌及癌前病变的诊疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 163-168.
阅读次数
全文


摘要