切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胸部外科电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (01) : 37 -45. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8773.2019.01.010

所属专题: 机器人专题 机器人手术 文献

机器人辅助微创食管切除术·综述

机器人辅助微创食管切除术的早期肿瘤学控制结果
张晓彬1, 郭旭峰1, 李斌1, 杨洋1, 茅腾1, 孙益峰1, 李志刚1,()   
  1. 1. 200030 上海交通大学附属胸科医院胸外科 上海交通大学食管疾病诊治中心
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-26 出版日期:2019-02-28
  • 通信作者: 李志刚

Early oncologic results of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

Xiaobing Zhang1, Xufeng Guo1, bin Li1, Yang Yang1, Teng Mao1, Yifeng Sun1, Zhigang Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Section of Esophageal Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China
  • Received:2018-12-26 Published:2019-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Zhigang Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Zhigang, Email:
引用本文:

张晓彬, 郭旭峰, 李斌, 杨洋, 茅腾, 孙益峰, 李志刚. 机器人辅助微创食管切除术的早期肿瘤学控制结果[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2019, 06(01): 37-45.

Xiaobing Zhang, Xufeng Guo, bin Li, Yang Yang, Teng Mao, Yifeng Sun, Zhigang Li. Early oncologic results of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Thoracic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 06(01): 37-45.

自21世纪机器人辅助微创食管癌切除术(RAMIE)首次被报道应用于临床,该项术式近20年来在全球得到了广泛推广。尽管RAMIE尚未被广泛认为是食管癌外科治疗的标准手术方式,已有多家中心报道了经裂孔和经胸路径RAMIE的安全性和可行性。多数研究报道的重点主要围绕围术期结果和近期肿瘤学结果。R0切除率接近95%并且局域复发率较低,提示RAMIE可能提高食管癌患者的远期生存率。该文拟结合既往文献报道和本中心经验,报道RAMIE的早期肿瘤学控制结果。

Since the first reported clinical application of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) in the early 2000s, RAE has gained increasing popularity worldwide in the recent 20 years. Although RAE is not yet regarded as standard surgical treatment for esophageal cancer, a lot of institutions have reported the safety and feasibility of robotic system in both transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) and transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE). Most of the studies focused on the surgical outcomes and recent oncologic results, the RAMIE have shown with short blood loss and effective early oncologic outcomes: R0 resection rate approximately 95% and rare locoregional recurrence. This may show that RAMIE has a tendency of improved long-term survival for esophageal cancer. Thus, the objective of this study is to report the early oncological control results of robot assisted esophagectomy, based on the previous publications and our initial experience.

表1 机器人辅助食管癌根治术(RAMIE)的肿瘤学结果文献汇总
作者 发表时间(年) n 手术路径 肿瘤类型(n) 病理分期(n) R0切除[n (%)] 中位随访期(月) 复发[(n (%)] 中位DFS(月) 中位OS(月) 存活率
Kernstine等[15] 2007 14 TT (McKeown) SCC (4)AD (8)
HGD (2)
HGD (2) 14 (100) 9 3 (21) 未报道 未报道 未报道
Ⅱa (1)
Ⅱb (2)
Ⅲ(7)
Ⅳ(2)
Galvani等[16] 2007 18 TH HGD (9)
AD (9)
HGD (9) 未报道 22 3 (17) 未报道 未报道 未报道
0 (2)
Ⅰ (5)
Ⅱa (2)
Boone等[17] 2009 47 TT (McKeown) SCC (18)
AD (29)
Ⅰ (2) 36 (77) 35 30 (64) 15 未报道 未报道
Ⅱa (6)
Ⅱb (3)
Ⅲ (8)
Ⅳ (28)
Dunn等[18] 2013 40 TH SCC (2)
AD (36)
疗效[n(%)] 36 (95) 29 16 (44) 20 未报道 未报道
完全有效5 (13.2)
ⅠA 10 (26.3)
ⅠB 6 (15.8)
ⅡA 1 (2.6)
ⅡB 7 (18.4)
ⅢA 3 (7.9)
ⅢB 4 (10.5)
Ⅳ 2 (5.3)
Coker等[19] 2014 23 TH AD (23) T0N0 7 (30) 21 (91) 7 6 (26) 未报道 未报道 未报道
T0N1 2 (9)
T1N0 4 (17)
T2N0 3 (13)
T2N1 1 (4)
T2N2 1 (4)
T3N0 2 (9)
T3N1 1 (4)
T3N2 1 (4)
T3N3 1 (4)
van der Sluis等[20] 2015 108 TT (McKeown) SCC (20)
AD (78)
无肿瘤(10)
病理T分期[n (%)] 102 (94) 58 51 (49%) 21 29 5年OS 42%
pT0 10 (9)
pT1 20 (19)
pT2 11 (10)
pT3 65 (60)
pT4a 2 (2)
病理N分期[n (%)]
pN0 48 (44)
pN1 30 (28)
pN2 20 (19)
pN3 10 (9)
Cerfolio等[21] 2015 85 TT (Ivor-Lewis) SCC (12) 未报道 84 (99) 27 未报道 未报道 未报道 1年73.1%
AD (72) 2年59.9%
HGD (1) 3年OS 54.2%
Wee JO等[22] 2016 20 TT (Ivor-Lewis) SCC (2)
AD (15)
HGD (1)
GIST (1)
失弛缓症(1)
完全缓解4 (20) 20 (100) 11 未报道 未报道 未报道 1年84%
T1-4N0M0 3 (15)
T1-4N1M0 8 (40)
T1-4N2M0 1 (5)
T1–4N3M0 1 (5)
其他3 (15)
Park S等[23] 2016 62 TT (McKeown) SCC ⅠA 10 (16.1) 未报道 17 未报道 未报道 未报道 5年OS 69%
ⅠB 24 (38.7)
ⅡA 4 (6.5)
ⅡB 15 (24.2)
ⅢA 6 (9.7)
ⅢB 2 (3.2)
ⅣC 1 (1.6)
Park S等[24] 2017 115 TT (McKeown) SCC Ⅰ 56 (50.5) 110 (95.7) 32 19 (17.1) 未报道 未报道 3年OS 85.0%
3年DFS 79.4%
Ⅱ 28 (25.2)
ⅢA 13 (11.7)
ⅢB + C 14 (12.6)
van der Horst S等[25] 2017 31 TT (McKeown) SCC (19)
AD (12)
T0N0 8 (25.8) 30 (96.8) 18 15 (48) 13 16 未报道
T0N1 2 (6.5)
T1N0 3 (9.7)
T1N1 2 (6.5)
T2N0 2 (6.5)
T2N1 1 (3.2)
T3N0 4 (12.9)
T3N1 2 (6.5)
T3N2 5 (16.1)
T3N3 1 (3.2)
T4aN3 1 (3.2)
Dunn等[26] 2017 98 TH SCC (6)
AD (92)
ⅠA 23 (28.0) 91 (97.8) 27 41 (42.7) 41 54 3年OS 57%
3年PFS 53%
ⅠB 15 (18.3)
ⅡA 4 (4.9)
ⅡB 17 (20.7)
ⅢA 16 (19.5)
ⅢB 2 (2.4)
Ⅳ 5 (6.1)
van der Sluis等[27] 2018 54 TT (McKeown) SCC (13)
AD (41)
pT0N0 10 (19) 50 (93) 40 未报道 26 未报道 未报道
pT0N1 6 (11)
pT1aN0 1 (2)
pT1aN1 1 (2)
pT1bN0 1 (2)
pT1bN1 3 (6)
pT1bN2 0 (0)
pT2N0 6 (11)
pT2N1 4 (7)
pT2N2 0 (0)
pT2N3 1 (2)
pT3N0 6 (11)
pT3N1 6 (11)
pT3N2 4 (7)
pT3N3 2 (4)
pT4aN1 0 (0)
pT4aN3 1 (2)
pT4b 2(4)
表2 206食管鳞癌患者的基本情况
表3 206例食管鳞癌患者近期手术结果
图1 206例食管鳞癌患者总体生存情况。A.总体生存率;B.分层分析-pTNM分期
图2 206例食管鳞癌患者无疾病生存情况。A.无疾病生存率;B.分层分析-pTNM分期
1
Bray F, Jemal A, Grey N, et al. Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008-2030): a population-based study[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2012, 13(8):790-801.
2
Orringer MB, Marshall B, Chang AC, et al. Two thousand transhiatal esophagectomies: changing trends, lessons learned[J]. Ann Surg, 2007,246(3):363-372.
3
Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2012, 379(9829):1887-1892.
4
Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S. Endoscopic esophagectomy trough a right thoracoscopic approach[J]. J R Coll Surg Edinb, 1992,37(1):7-11.
5
DePaula AL, Hashiba K, Ferreira EA, et al. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with esophagogastroplasty [J]. Surg Laparosc Endose, 1995,5(6):1-5.
6
Nguyen NT, Schauer PR, Luketich JD. Combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic approach to esophagectomy [J]. J Am Coll Surg, 1999,188(3):328-332.
7
Watson DI, Davies N, Jamieson GG. Totally endoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy [J]. Surg Endosc,1999,13(3):293-297.
8
Nafteux P, Moons J, Coosemans W, et al. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: a valuable alternative to open oesophagectomy for the treatment of early oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2011,40(6):1455-1463.
9
Sihag S, Wright CD, Wain JC, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2012,42(3):430-437.
10
Tsujimoto H, Takahata R, Nomura S, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer attenuates postoperative systemic responses and pulmonary complications[J]. Surgery, 2012;151(5):667-673.
11
Mu J, Yuan Z, Zhang B, et al. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2014,127(4):747-752.
12
Kauppila JH, Xie S, Johar A, et al. Meta-analysis of health-related quality of life after minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer[J].Br J Surg, 2017 ,104(9):1131-1140.
13
Horgan S, Berger RA, Elli EF, et al. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy[J]. Am Surg, 2003,69(7):624-626.
14
Kernstine KH, DeArmond DT, Karimi M, et al. The robotic, 2-stage, 3-field esophagolymphadenectomy[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2004,127(6):1847-1849.
15
Kernstine KH, DeArmond DT, Shamoun DM, et al. The first series of completely robotic esophagectomies with three-field lymphadenectomy: initial experience[J]. Surg Endosc, 2007,21(12):2285-2292.
16
Galvani CA, Gorodner MV, Moser F, et al. Robotically assisted laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2008,22(1):188-195.
17
Boone J, Schipper ME, Moojen WA, et al. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy for cancer[J]. Br J Surg, 2009,96(8):878-886.
18
Dunn DH, Johnson EM, Morphew JA, et al. Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2013,26(2):159-166.
19
Coker AM, Barajas-Gamboa JS, Cheverie J, et al. Outcomes of robotic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2014,24(2):89-94.
20
van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, Verhage RJ, et al. Oncologic long-term results of robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2015,22(Suppl 3):S1350-S1356.
21
Cerfolio RJ, Wei B, Hawn MT, et al. Robotic esophagectomy for cancer: early results and lesson learned[J]. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2016,28(1):160-169.
22
Wee JO, Bravo-I?iguez CE, Jaklitsch MT. Early experience of robot-assisted esophagectomy with circular end-to-end stapled anastomosis[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2016,102(1):253-259.
23
Park S, Hwang Y, Lee HJ, et al. Comparison of robot-assisted esophagectomy and thoracoscopic esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2016,8(10):2853-2861.
24
Park SY, Kim DJ, Do YW, et al. The oncologic outcome of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients after robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy with total mediastinal lymphadenectomy[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2017,103(4):1151-1157.
25
van der Horst S, Weijs TJ, Ruurda JP, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in the upper mediastinum[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2017,9(Suppl 8):S834-S842.
26
Dunn DH, Johnson EM, Anderson CA, et al. Operative and survival outcomes in a series of 100 consecutive cases of robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomies[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2017,30(10):1-7.
27
van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, May AM, et al. Robot-assisted Minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2018,10.doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003031.
28
van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, van der Horst S, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial)[J]. Trials, 2012,13:230.
29
Yerokun BA, Sun Z, Yang CJ, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a population-based analysis[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2016,102(2):416-423.
30
Espinoza-Mercado F, Imai TA, Borgella JD, et al. Does the approach matter? Comparing survival in robotic, minimally invasive, and open esophagectomies[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2018, 9. pii: S0003-4975(18)31440-1.
[1] 高加林, 曹亚娟. 腹腔镜解剖性肝右后叶切除治疗食管癌根治术后孤立性肝转移[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 239-242.
[2] 郁鹏程, 陈仕林, 詹传飞, 沈晓康, 冯东杰. 完全胸腹腔镜下双荷包缝合对食管胃胸内吻合的影响[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(05): 275-280.
[3] 施我大, 张亚军, 施展, 吴纪祥, 常绘文, 易忠权, 梁晓东, 周晶晶, 宋建祥. Treg细胞通过上调TGF-β1和B7-H3表达促进食管癌细胞增殖、迁移和侵袭[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 65-75.
[4] 侯超, 潘美辰, 吴文明, 黄兴广, 李翔, 程凌雪, 朱玉轩, 李文波. 早期食管癌及上皮内瘤变内镜黏膜下剥离术后食管狭窄的危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 383-387.
[5] 单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
[6] 曹旬旬, 费素娟. 食管癌患者肿瘤组织CXCL5和CXCR2的表达与病情和预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 299-304.
[7] 苏鹏, 吕会来, 温士旺, 黄超, 张缜, 田子强. 全腔镜下食管癌根治术围手术期呼吸系统并发症发生的危险因素分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 294-298.
[8] 屠松霞, 郑红艳, 朱姝, 徐夏君. 食管癌术后患者肠内营养耐受不良的影响因素及列线图风险模型[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 73-77.
[9] 袁耒, 邹志强, 李传海, 刘玉, 徐瑞鑫, 杜以营. 早期食管癌的光动力治疗[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(05): 306-309.
[10] 陈柯豫, 黄艳齐, 张玲利. 同时性多发早期食管癌及高级别上皮内瘤变的危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 524-528.
[11] 孙天宇, 王如文, 蒋彬. 食管碰撞癌1例[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 238-240.
[12] 李正龙, 赵永生, 罗钶鑫, 彭忠勤. 胸腔镜切除治疗全内脏反位合并食管癌手术1例并文献复习[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 234-237.
[13] 秦建军, 郭旭峰, 胡杨, 李向楠, 李卓毅, 林江波, 梅新宇, 唐鹏, 王长春, 王枫, 王洪琰, 尹俊, 袁勇, 赵晋波, 李志刚, 李印. 日本2022版食管癌诊治指南在中国的接受度——中国红杉树专家调研[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 195-199.
[14] 李国仁, 戴建华. 我国食管癌治疗理念与模式的沿革和进展[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 117-125.
[15] 朱开元, 李志刚. 食管癌术后吻合口瘘临床管理进展[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 50-56.
阅读次数
全文


摘要