切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胸部外科电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (03) : 151 -155. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8773.2016.03.05

所属专题: 机器人专题 机器人手术 文献

论著

机器人辅助食管癌的微创外科切除:上海市胸科医院75例临床报道
杨煜1, 张晓彬1, 孙益峰1, 叶波1, 仲晨曦1, 郭旭峰1, 李志刚1,()   
  1. 1. 200030 上海市胸科医院食管外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-25 出版日期:2016-08-28
  • 通信作者: 李志刚

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: clinical report of 75 cases from Shanghai Chest Hospital

Yu Yang1, Xiaobin Zhang1, Yifeng Sun1, Bo Ye1, Chenxi Zhong1, Xufeng Guo1, Zhigang Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Section of Esophageal Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, China
  • Received:2016-06-25 Published:2016-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Zhigang Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author:Li Zhigang, Email:
引用本文:

杨煜, 张晓彬, 孙益峰, 叶波, 仲晨曦, 郭旭峰, 李志刚. 机器人辅助食管癌的微创外科切除:上海市胸科医院75例临床报道[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2016, 03(03): 151-155.

Yu Yang, Xiaobin Zhang, Yifeng Sun, Bo Ye, Chenxi Zhong, Xufeng Guo, Zhigang Li. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: clinical report of 75 cases from Shanghai Chest Hospital[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Thoracic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 03(03): 151-155.

目的

通过回顾国内最大的一组单中心达芬奇机器人辅助食管癌(RAE)手术治疗结果,报道上海市胸科医院RAE根治术的早期结果和相关技术学习曲线。

方法

回顾上海市胸科医院自2015年11月至2016年8月开展的所有RAE患者,共75例。研究内容包括患者的一般资料、术前肿瘤病理分期、手术过程、肿瘤切除结果和术后恢复情况。

结果

75例RAE患者中,男性53例,女性22例。平均年龄(62.1±8.0)岁。术前诱导4例(5.3%),R0切除率73/75(97.3%),平均出血量(230.7±73.5)ml。全组平均手术时间(275.2±56.8)min,胸部手术时间(95.6±27.5)min。最早20例与之后55例比较:全部手术时间分别为(318.0±48.1)min和(259.7±51.8)min(t= 4.391,P<0.001);胸部手术时间分别为(115.1±29.0)min和(88.6±23.5)min(t= 4.057,P=0.001)。平均切除淋巴结总数为(15.9±11.0)枚,切除胸部淋巴结个数为(9.8±6.9)枚,切除喉返神经旁淋巴结个数为(3.3±2.6)枚。以手术日期为分界,20例为组,对75例患者行亚分组后,上纵隔淋巴结采样率分别为85.0%、100.0%、100.0%和100.0%(χ2=8.594,P=0.049),其中左喉返神经旁淋巴结采样率分别为65.0%、95.0%、95.0%和100.0%(χ2=13.920,P=0.006)。术后主要并发症包括呼吸功能不全5例(6.7%)、乳糜胸2例(2.7%)、气管食管瘘1例(1.3%)、肺栓塞1例(1.3%)、喉返神经麻痹(VCP)11例(14.7%)。以手术日期为界,25例为组,对75例患者行亚分组后发现,VCP发生率明显下降,但差异无统计学意义(24.0%、12.0%和8.0%;χ2=2.770,P=0.250)。患者中位住院时间12 d,无术后30 d内死亡病例。

结论

RAE根治术安全、可靠。经过20例左右的学习曲线后,术者可熟练掌握胸部机器人手术操作和纵隔淋巴结清扫,尤其是双侧喉返神经旁可获得明显改善,而喉返神经损伤率也能明显降低。

Objective

To review the outcomes of robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) for esophageal cancer in Shanghai Chest Hospital, and present the learning curve experience.

Methods

The clinical data of 75 patients undergoing RAE for esophageal cancer between November 2015 and August 2016 in Shanghai Chest Hospital were reviewed. The demographics, preoperative staging, surgical procedure, resection results and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Among these 75 patients, 53 were males and the other 22 were females, with the mean age of (62.1±8.0)years. Preoperative induction took place in 4 patients(5.3%). The R0 resection rate was 97.3%(73/75). The mean volume of blood loss was (230.7±73.5) ml. The mean total operation time of all patients was (275.2±56.8) min, and the mean thoracic operation time was (95.6±27.5) min. The total operation time of the former 20 cases was significantly longer than that of the latter 55 cases[(318.0±48.1) min vs(259.7±51.8) min, t= 4.391, P<0.001]. The thoracic operation time of the former 20 cases was significantly longer than that of the latter 55 cases[(115.1±29.0) min vs(88.6±23.5) min, t= 4.057, P=0.001]. The mean number of lymph node dissection was 15.9±11.0, the number of thoracic lymph node dissection was 9.8±6.9, and the number of recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection was 3.3±2.6. When subgrouping according to operation sequencesof 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 and 61-75, the lymph node sampling rates of upper mediastinum were 85.0%, 100.0%, 100.0% and 100.0%, respectively(χ2=8.594, P=0.049), and the lymph node sampling rates along left recurrent laryngeal nerve were 65.0%, 95.0%, 95.0% and 100.0%, respectively(χ2=13.920, P=0.006). The main complications were respiratory failure(5 cases, 6.7%), chylothorax (2 cases, 2.7%), tracheo-esophageal fistula(1 case, 1.3%), pulmonary embolism(1 case, 1.3%) and vocal cord paralysis(VCP)(11 cases, 14.7%). When subgrouping according to operation sequencesof 1-25, 26-50 and 51-75, the incidence of VCP decreased without significant difference(24.0%, 12.0% and 8.0%; χ2=2.770, P=0.250). The median length of hospital stay was 12 d, and there was no 30-day mortality.

Conclusions

RAE is a safe and feasible alternative for treatment of esophageal cancer, which can improve the efficacy of lymph node dissection, especially for the lymphadenectomy along recurrent laryngeal nerve. The ability to execute a safe thoracicesophagectomy with complete mediastinal lymphadenectomy during RAE is improved over time, plateauing after the first 20 cases.

表1 达芬奇机器人辅助食管癌手术先手术组与后手术组手术时间比较(min,±s)
[1]
YeB,ZhongCX,YangY, et al. Lymph node dissection in esophageal carcinoma: Minimally invasive esophagectomy vs open surgery[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2016,22(19):4750-4756.
[2]
KauppiJ,RasanenJ,SihvoE, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma[J].Surgical Endoscopy, 2015, 29(9):2614-2619.
[3]
SinghRK,PhamTH,DiggsBS, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides equivalent oncologic outcomes to open esophagectomy for locally advanced (stage Ⅱ or Ⅲ) esophageal carcinoma [J]. Arch Surg, 2011, 146(6):711-714.
[4]
DolanJP,KaurT,DiggsBS, et al. Impact of comorbidity on outcomes and overall survival after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2013, 27(11):4094-4103.
[5]
van HillegersbergR,BooneJ,DraaismaWA, et al. First experience with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer[J]. Surg Endosc, 2006,20(9):1435-1439.
[6]
ParkSY,KimDJ,YuWS, et al. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy with extensive mediastinal lymphadenectomy: experience with 114 consecutive patients with intrathoracic esophageal cancer[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2016,29(4):326-332.
[7]
DantocMM,CoxMR,EslickGD. Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review [J]. J Gastrointest Surg,2012, 16(3):486-494.
[8]
Ben-DavidK,SarosiGA,CendanJC, et al.Decreasing morbidity and mortality in 100 consecutive minimally invasive esophagectomies [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, 26(1):162-167.
[9]
BergerAC,BloomenthalA,WekslerB, et al. Oncologic efficacy is not compromised, and may be improved with minimally invasive esophagectomy [J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2011, 212(4):560-566; discussion 566-568.
[10]
BiereSS,van Berge HenegouwenMI,MaasKW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial [J]. Lancet 2012, 379:1887-1892.
[11]
LuketichJD,PennathurA,AwaisO, et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients[J]. Ann Surg, 2012, 256(1):95-103.
[1] 朱洪宇, 曹越, 赵鑫洋, 周毅. 三孔全腔镜手术治疗中重度男性乳房发育症[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 152-157.
[2] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会. 中国活体肝移植供者微创手术技术指南(2024版)[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 241-252.
[3] 郭小琦, 张璞, 李小军, 余明, 王博. 口服醋酸泼尼松联合局部注射曲安奈德对食管早癌ESD术后食管狭窄及肺部感染的预防疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 288-291.
[4] 张宗明, 董家鸿, 何小东, 王秋生, 徐智, 刘立民, 张翀. 老年胆道外科热点问题的争议与思考[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 754-762.
[5] 陈海鹏, 张金珠, 关旭, 赵志勋, 刘恒昌, 姜争, 刘正, 王锡山. 达芬奇机器人辅助直肠及乙状结肠癌根治术的学习曲线分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 205-208.
[6] 曹文钰, 郭鹏, 李锦平. 微创手术及非手术方式治疗慢性硬膜下血肿的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 304-309.
[7] 李新宇, 梁建锋. 3D打印导板辅助颅内血肿穿刺引流手术[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 382-384.
[8] 段伟, 刘飞, 许光源, 程宇豪, 陈星. 食管癌调强放疗计划剂量学参数差异对放射性肺炎发生及严重程度的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 320-324.
[9] 陶金华, 陈珊珊, 陈晓四. 阿帕替尼联合替吉奥治疗晚期食管癌的疗效与安全性影响因素评价[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 325-329.
[10] 朱芮晴, 张荣贵, 冯秀雪, 张波, 刘圣圳, 柴宁莉, 令狐恩强. 基于倾向性评分匹配法的日间消化内镜超级微创手术治疗直肠神经内分泌肿瘤的疗效评价[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 166-170.
[11] 高鹏强, 林军鹏, 王佩元, 林辉, 周航, 魏文巍, 柳硕岩, 王枫. 胸段食管鳞状细胞癌中锁骨上淋巴结转移对预后的影响:一项大型回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 211-218.
[12] 李春光, 杨洋, 李斌, 华荣, 李志刚. 完全腹腔镜下管状胃制作技术在食管癌McKeown手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 219-224.
[13] 沈海锋, 吕方伊, 顾海华, 常志博, 陈盈, 王苹莉, 吴祖群, 邱福铭, 姚杰, 范军强. 局部进展期肺癌新辅助治疗后胸腔镜袖式肺叶切除术——浙江大学医学院附属第二医院2014—2023年56例回顾性分析[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 158-166.
[14] 卢琪珏, 李斌, 杨超, 华荣, 李春光, 李志刚. 改良Grillo气管重建术在颈段食管癌挽救性食管切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(02): 91-95.
[15] 刘石健骢, 甘向峰, 吕良湛, 曹庆东. 机器人辅助充气式纵隔镜联合腹腔镜食管癌切除术初步探索[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(02): 104-108.
阅读次数
全文


摘要