切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胸部外科电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (03) : 151 -155. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8773.2016.03.05

所属专题: 机器人专题 机器人手术 文献

论著

机器人辅助食管癌的微创外科切除:上海市胸科医院75例临床报道
杨煜1, 张晓彬1, 孙益峰1, 叶波1, 仲晨曦1, 郭旭峰1, 李志刚1,()   
  1. 1. 200030 上海市胸科医院食管外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-25 出版日期:2016-08-28
  • 通信作者: 李志刚

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: clinical report of 75 cases from Shanghai Chest Hospital

Yu Yang1, Xiaobin Zhang1, Yifeng Sun1, Bo Ye1, Chenxi Zhong1, Xufeng Guo1, Zhigang Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Section of Esophageal Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, China
  • Received:2016-06-25 Published:2016-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Zhigang Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author:Li Zhigang, Email:
引用本文:

杨煜, 张晓彬, 孙益峰, 叶波, 仲晨曦, 郭旭峰, 李志刚. 机器人辅助食管癌的微创外科切除:上海市胸科医院75例临床报道[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2016, 03(03): 151-155.

Yu Yang, Xiaobin Zhang, Yifeng Sun, Bo Ye, Chenxi Zhong, Xufeng Guo, Zhigang Li. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: clinical report of 75 cases from Shanghai Chest Hospital[J]. Chinese Journal of Thoracic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 03(03): 151-155.

目的

通过回顾国内最大的一组单中心达芬奇机器人辅助食管癌(RAE)手术治疗结果,报道上海市胸科医院RAE根治术的早期结果和相关技术学习曲线。

方法

回顾上海市胸科医院自2015年11月至2016年8月开展的所有RAE患者,共75例。研究内容包括患者的一般资料、术前肿瘤病理分期、手术过程、肿瘤切除结果和术后恢复情况。

结果

75例RAE患者中,男性53例,女性22例。平均年龄(62.1±8.0)岁。术前诱导4例(5.3%),R0切除率73/75(97.3%),平均出血量(230.7±73.5)ml。全组平均手术时间(275.2±56.8)min,胸部手术时间(95.6±27.5)min。最早20例与之后55例比较:全部手术时间分别为(318.0±48.1)min和(259.7±51.8)min(t= 4.391,P<0.001);胸部手术时间分别为(115.1±29.0)min和(88.6±23.5)min(t= 4.057,P=0.001)。平均切除淋巴结总数为(15.9±11.0)枚,切除胸部淋巴结个数为(9.8±6.9)枚,切除喉返神经旁淋巴结个数为(3.3±2.6)枚。以手术日期为分界,20例为组,对75例患者行亚分组后,上纵隔淋巴结采样率分别为85.0%、100.0%、100.0%和100.0%(χ2=8.594,P=0.049),其中左喉返神经旁淋巴结采样率分别为65.0%、95.0%、95.0%和100.0%(χ2=13.920,P=0.006)。术后主要并发症包括呼吸功能不全5例(6.7%)、乳糜胸2例(2.7%)、气管食管瘘1例(1.3%)、肺栓塞1例(1.3%)、喉返神经麻痹(VCP)11例(14.7%)。以手术日期为界,25例为组,对75例患者行亚分组后发现,VCP发生率明显下降,但差异无统计学意义(24.0%、12.0%和8.0%;χ2=2.770,P=0.250)。患者中位住院时间12 d,无术后30 d内死亡病例。

结论

RAE根治术安全、可靠。经过20例左右的学习曲线后,术者可熟练掌握胸部机器人手术操作和纵隔淋巴结清扫,尤其是双侧喉返神经旁可获得明显改善,而喉返神经损伤率也能明显降低。

Objective

To review the outcomes of robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) for esophageal cancer in Shanghai Chest Hospital, and present the learning curve experience.

Methods

The clinical data of 75 patients undergoing RAE for esophageal cancer between November 2015 and August 2016 in Shanghai Chest Hospital were reviewed. The demographics, preoperative staging, surgical procedure, resection results and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Among these 75 patients, 53 were males and the other 22 were females, with the mean age of (62.1±8.0)years. Preoperative induction took place in 4 patients(5.3%). The R0 resection rate was 97.3%(73/75). The mean volume of blood loss was (230.7±73.5) ml. The mean total operation time of all patients was (275.2±56.8) min, and the mean thoracic operation time was (95.6±27.5) min. The total operation time of the former 20 cases was significantly longer than that of the latter 55 cases[(318.0±48.1) min vs(259.7±51.8) min, t= 4.391, P<0.001]. The thoracic operation time of the former 20 cases was significantly longer than that of the latter 55 cases[(115.1±29.0) min vs(88.6±23.5) min, t= 4.057, P=0.001]. The mean number of lymph node dissection was 15.9±11.0, the number of thoracic lymph node dissection was 9.8±6.9, and the number of recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection was 3.3±2.6. When subgrouping according to operation sequencesof 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 and 61-75, the lymph node sampling rates of upper mediastinum were 85.0%, 100.0%, 100.0% and 100.0%, respectively(χ2=8.594, P=0.049), and the lymph node sampling rates along left recurrent laryngeal nerve were 65.0%, 95.0%, 95.0% and 100.0%, respectively(χ2=13.920, P=0.006). The main complications were respiratory failure(5 cases, 6.7%), chylothorax (2 cases, 2.7%), tracheo-esophageal fistula(1 case, 1.3%), pulmonary embolism(1 case, 1.3%) and vocal cord paralysis(VCP)(11 cases, 14.7%). When subgrouping according to operation sequencesof 1-25, 26-50 and 51-75, the incidence of VCP decreased without significant difference(24.0%, 12.0% and 8.0%; χ2=2.770, P=0.250). The median length of hospital stay was 12 d, and there was no 30-day mortality.

Conclusions

RAE is a safe and feasible alternative for treatment of esophageal cancer, which can improve the efficacy of lymph node dissection, especially for the lymphadenectomy along recurrent laryngeal nerve. The ability to execute a safe thoracicesophagectomy with complete mediastinal lymphadenectomy during RAE is improved over time, plateauing after the first 20 cases.

表1 达芬奇机器人辅助食管癌手术先手术组与后手术组手术时间比较(min,±s)
[1]
YeB,ZhongCX,YangY, et al. Lymph node dissection in esophageal carcinoma: Minimally invasive esophagectomy vs open surgery[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2016,22(19):4750-4756.
[2]
KauppiJ,RasanenJ,SihvoE, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma[J].Surgical Endoscopy, 2015, 29(9):2614-2619.
[3]
SinghRK,PhamTH,DiggsBS, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides equivalent oncologic outcomes to open esophagectomy for locally advanced (stage Ⅱ or Ⅲ) esophageal carcinoma [J]. Arch Surg, 2011, 146(6):711-714.
[4]
DolanJP,KaurT,DiggsBS, et al. Impact of comorbidity on outcomes and overall survival after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2013, 27(11):4094-4103.
[5]
van HillegersbergR,BooneJ,DraaismaWA, et al. First experience with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer[J]. Surg Endosc, 2006,20(9):1435-1439.
[6]
ParkSY,KimDJ,YuWS, et al. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy with extensive mediastinal lymphadenectomy: experience with 114 consecutive patients with intrathoracic esophageal cancer[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2016,29(4):326-332.
[7]
DantocMM,CoxMR,EslickGD. Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review [J]. J Gastrointest Surg,2012, 16(3):486-494.
[8]
Ben-DavidK,SarosiGA,CendanJC, et al.Decreasing morbidity and mortality in 100 consecutive minimally invasive esophagectomies [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, 26(1):162-167.
[9]
BergerAC,BloomenthalA,WekslerB, et al. Oncologic efficacy is not compromised, and may be improved with minimally invasive esophagectomy [J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2011, 212(4):560-566; discussion 566-568.
[10]
BiereSS,van Berge HenegouwenMI,MaasKW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial [J]. Lancet 2012, 379:1887-1892.
[11]
LuketichJD,PennathurA,AwaisO, et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients[J]. Ann Surg, 2012, 256(1):95-103.
[1] 田锋, 郭俊超. 中国微创技术在胰腺癌手术中的应用现状和展望[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 124-128.
[2] 李炳根, 龚独辉, 赖泽如, 聂向阳. 产后腹直肌分离全腔镜下肌后/腹膜外补片修补术的临床研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 724-727.
[3] 高加林, 曹亚娟. 腹腔镜解剖性肝右后叶切除治疗食管癌根治术后孤立性肝转移[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 239-242.
[4] 施我大, 张亚军, 施展, 吴纪祥, 常绘文, 易忠权, 梁晓东, 周晶晶, 宋建祥. Treg细胞通过上调TGF-β1和B7-H3表达促进食管癌细胞增殖、迁移和侵袭[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 65-75.
[5] 中国医师协会结直肠肿瘤专业委员会, 中国医师协会结直肠肿瘤专业委员会, 中国NOSES联盟. 结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术指南(2023版)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 89-99.
[6] 谭可, 李锦平, 彭玉涛, 吴文汧, 杨子文, 汪阳, 陶立波, 刘畅. 机器人辅助立体定向血肿引流术治疗自发性脑出血疗效及卫生经济学评价[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 205-214.
[7] 侯超, 潘美辰, 吴文明, 黄兴广, 李翔, 程凌雪, 朱玉轩, 李文波. 早期食管癌及上皮内瘤变内镜黏膜下剥离术后食管狭窄的危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 383-387.
[8] 单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
[9] 苏鹏, 吕会来, 温士旺, 黄超, 张缜, 田子强. 全腔镜下食管癌根治术围手术期呼吸系统并发症发生的危险因素分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 294-298.
[10] 曹旬旬, 费素娟. 食管癌患者肿瘤组织CXCL5和CXCR2的表达与病情和预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 299-304.
[11] 陈柯豫, 黄艳齐, 张玲利. 同时性多发早期食管癌及高级别上皮内瘤变的危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 524-528.
[12] 秦建军, 郭旭峰, 胡杨, 李向楠, 李卓毅, 林江波, 梅新宇, 唐鹏, 王长春, 王枫, 王洪琰, 尹俊, 袁勇, 赵晋波, 李志刚, 李印. 日本2022版食管癌诊治指南在中国的接受度——中国红杉树专家调研[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 195-199.
[13] 李正龙, 赵永生, 罗钶鑫, 彭忠勤. 胸腔镜切除治疗全内脏反位合并食管癌手术1例并文献复习[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 234-237.
[14] 孙天宇, 王如文, 蒋彬. 食管碰撞癌1例[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 238-240.
[15] 王磊, 蒋连勇, 徐佩, 毕锐, 胡睿, 谢晓, 刘洪涛, 肖海波, 胡丰庆. 复合式胸壁畸形的联合微创手术治疗[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 143-148.
阅读次数
全文


摘要